IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse17/169457.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Future of International Radio Regulations: Transformation Towards Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • El-Moghazi, Mohamed
  • Whalley, Jason
  • Irvine, James

Abstract

While the international radio regulations (RR) do not prevent opportunistic access, the application of these regulations largely does not encourage such a concept. This is due to the existence of different elements of restriction within these regulations including the absence of a quantified definition of harmful interference and the lack of enforcement measures for resolving ITU-R interference procedures. It is argued that operating on a non-interference-basis within these regulations discourages the application of opportunistic access. Moreover, there is confusion among many of the ITU-R countries between the application of the RR when it comes to cross-border interference with neighbouring countries, and the application of the RR within the country. In general, it is argued that the main problem with the RR is not only the restrictive elements within them, but also the paradigm that it has created over the course of the last century. Measures that could enable the transformation towards more sharing in the RR are having a dedicated band for opportunistic access devices, and allocating more bands for ISM applications. The second alternative is to enable opportunistic access in a more explicit way in the RR with more rights in higher bands. Having said that, if an entrepreneurial country or groups of countries advocate one of these measures, there could be a transformation at the international level, though this would require enough support from sufficient number of countries within the ITU-R. The last step is to include the regulations related to the concept of opportunistic access in the RR.

Suggested Citation

  • El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2017. "The Future of International Radio Regulations: Transformation Towards Sharing," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169457, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse17:169457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/169457/1/El-Moghazi-et-al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2016. "International Radio Spectrum Management Regime: Restricting or Enabling Opportunistic Access in the TVWS?," 27th European Regional ITS Conference, Cambridge (UK) 2016 148666, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Wellenius, Bjorn & Neto, Isabel, 2005. "The radio spectrum : opportunities and challenges for the developing world," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3742, The World Bank.
    3. Hazlett, Thomas W, 1998. "Assigning Property Rights to Radio Spectrum Users: Why Did FCC License Auctions Take 67 Years?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(2), pages 529-575, October.
    4. Cave, Martin & Webb, William, 2012. "The unfinished history of usage rights for spectrum," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 293-300.
    5. Finnemore, Martha & Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998. "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(4), pages 887-917, October.
    6. Noam, Eli, 1998. "Spectrum Auctions: Yesterday's Heresy, Today's Orthodoxy, Tomorrow's Anachronism. Taking the Next Step to Open Spectrum Access," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(2), pages 765-790, October.
    7. Freyens, Benoît, 2009. "A policy spectrum for spectrum economics," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 128-144, June.
    8. Kruse, Elizabeth, 2002. "From Free Privilege to Regulation: Wireless Firms and the Competition for Spectrum Rights before World War I," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(4), pages 659-703, January.
    9. Codding, George A., 1991. "Evolution of the ITU," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 271-285, August.
    10. De Vries, Gary & De Vries, Pierre, 2007. "The Role of Licence-Exemption in Spectrum Reform," MPRA Paper 6847, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. de Vries, J. Pierre & Sieh, Kaleb A., 2012. "Reception-oriented radio rights: Increasing the value of wireless by explicitly defining and delegating radio operating rights," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 522-530.
    12. Forde, Tim & Doyle, Linda, 2013. "A TV whitespace ecosystem for licensed cognitive radio," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 130-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matinmikko-Blue, Marja & Yrjölä, Seppo & Ahokangas, Petri & Seppänen, Veikko & Hämmäinen, Heikki & Jurva, Risto, 2019. "Value of the spectrum for local mobile communication networks: Insights into awarding and pricing the 5G spectrum bands," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205199, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Massaro, Maria & Beltrán, Fernando, 2020. "Will 5G lead to more spectrum sharing? Discussing recent developments of the LSA and the CBRS spectrum sharing frameworks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2016. "Wireless access policy for electronic communications services (WAPECS): Collision between theory and practice," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 821-835.
    2. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2019. "Technology neutrality: Exploring the interaction between International Mobile Telecommunication and national spectrum management policies," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 531-548.
    3. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2014. "Wireless Access Policy for Electronic Communications Services (WAPECS): Collision between theory and practice," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101380, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. David Clayton, 2004. "The consumption of radio broadcast technologies in Hong Kong, c.1930–1960," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 57(4), pages 691-726, November.
    5. Chou, Yuntsai, 2014. "A compensation model developed to liberalize spectrum in the G4 era," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106897, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    6. Thaw Tar Min & Fife, Elizabeth & Bohlin, Erik, 2014. "Myanmar national spectrum management policy: Is it best practice?," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101431, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Jain, Rekha & Dara, Rishabh, 2017. "Framework for evolving spectrum management regimes: Lessons from India," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 473-485.
    8. Erik Bohlin & Gary Madden & Aaron Morey, 2010. "An Econometric Analysis of 3G Auction Spectrum Valuations," RSCAS Working Papers 2010/55, European University Institute.
    9. Lawrence White, 2000. ""Propertyzing" the Electromagnetic Spectrum: Why It's Important, and How to Begin," Working Papers 00-08, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    10. Basaure, Arturo & Marianov, Vladimir & Paredes, Ricardo, 2015. "Implications of dynamic spectrum management for regulation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 563-579.
    11. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2016. "International Radio Spectrum Management Regime: Restricting or Enabling Opportunistic Access in the TVWS?," 27th European Regional ITS Conference, Cambridge (UK) 2016 148666, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    12. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2014. "International spectrum management regime: Is gridlock blocking flexible spectrum property rights?," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106866, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    13. Chou, Yuntsai & Hu, Weimin & Lien, Hsienming, 2015. "A compensation model developed to increase spectrum usage efficiency in the 4G era," 2015 Regional ITS Conference, Los Angeles 2015 146334, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    14. Wellenius, Bjorn & Neto, Isabel, 2005. "The radio spectrum : opportunities and challenges for the developing world," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3742, The World Bank.
    15. Minervini, Leo Fulvio, 2014. "Spectrum management reform: Rethinking practices," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 136-146.
    16. Steininger, Lea & Hesse, Casimir, 2024. "Buying into new ideas: The ECB’s evolving justification of unlimited liquidity," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 357, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    17. Grønnevet, Gorm A. & Hansen, Bjørn & Reme, Bjørn-Atle, 2016. "Spectrum policy and competition in mobile data," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 34-41.
    18. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Federico Maria Ferrara & Jörg S Haas & Andrew Peterson & Thomas Sattler, 2022. "Exports vs. Investment: How Public Discourse Shapes Support for External Imbalances," Post-Print hal-02569351, HAL.
    20. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse17:169457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.