IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ipewps/313641.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Industrial policy space in emerging economies: The case of Chile's lithium industry and the energy and raw materials chapter in the EU-Chile free trade agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Dünhaupt, Petra
  • Gräf, Helena
  • Jiménez, Valeria
  • Jungmann, Benjamin

Abstract

Adequate policy space is essential for resource-rich countries to move up the value chain and seize the opportunities presented by global decarbonization and the demand for low-carbon technologies. However, WTO rules, investment and free trade agreements (FTAs) deprive nonhegemonic powers of the industrial policy tools used by successful developmental states in the past, thus reducing policy space and arguably 'kicking away the ladder'. The present article addresses these issues in the context of Chile's lithium industrial policy and the modernised EU-Chile FTA. With the objective of moving up the lithium value chain, Chile employs preferential pricing: offering lithium at a preferential price to companies that establish production sites for higher-value processes. However, the modernized FTA includes restrictions on the use of preferential pricing, as outlined in its Energy and Raw Materials Chapter (ERM) -a novel element in the EU FTAs aimed at safeguarding access to critical raw materials for the EU's Green Deal objectives. By means of document analysis and 21 expert interviews, we find that the modernised FTA and its ERM are compatible with Chile's current lithium industrial policy. Nonetheless, they further restrict Chile's policy space, potentially limiting future policy adaptations. These restrictions, alongside further national factors, may hinder the fulfilment of Chile's industrial policy goals. The article offers explanations for the negotiation outcomes and identifies factors beyond policy space that constrain the effectiveness of Chile's lithium industrial policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Dünhaupt, Petra & Gräf, Helena & Jiménez, Valeria & Jungmann, Benjamin, 2025. "Industrial policy space in emerging economies: The case of Chile's lithium industry and the energy and raw materials chapter in the EU-Chile free trade agreement," IPE Working Papers 251/2025, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ipewps:313641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/313641/1/1919890440.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aggarwal Vinod K. & Evenett Simon J., 2014. "Do WTO rules preclude industrial policy? Evidence from the global economic crisis," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Bulfone, Fabio & Ergen, Timur & Maggor, Erez, 2024. "The political economy of conditionality and the new industrial policy," MPIfG Discussion Paper 24/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Tomás Bril-Mascarenhas & Aldo Madariaga, 2019. "Business Power and the Minimal State: The Defeat of Industrial Policy in Chile," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 1047-1066, June.
    4. Kristen Hopewell, 2024. "The (surprise) return of development policy space in the multilateral trading system: what the WTO Appellate Body blockage means for the developmental state," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 1245-1270, July.
    5. Manuel Agosin & Cristian Larraín & Nicolás Grau, 2009. "Industrial policy in Chile," Working Papers wp294, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    6. Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Evenett, Simon J., 2014. "Do WTO rules preclude industrial policy? Evidence from the global economic crisis," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 481-509, December.
    7. Robert H. Wade, 2018. "The Developmental State: Dead or Alive?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 518-546, March.
    8. Wade, Robert H., 2018. "The developmental state: dead or alive?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87356, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Alice H. Amsden & Takashi Hikino, 2000. "The Bark Is Worse Than the Bite: New WTO Law and Late Industrialization," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 570(1), pages 104-114, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bulfone, Fabio & Ergen, Timur & Maggor, Erez, 2024. "The political economy of conditionality and the new industrial policy," MPIfG Discussion Paper 24/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Pritish Behuria, 2025. "Is the Study of Development Humiliating or Emancipatory? The Case Against Universalising ‘Development’," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 37(2), pages 344-355, April.
    3. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2024. "Trade Policy Space, Aid for Trade and, Intra-African and External African Manufactured Exports," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Iqra Yaseen & Mohammad Shafi Sofi, 2024. "Anatomy of trade disputes: mapping patterns and trends of WTO dispute initiations (1995–2023)," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 51(4), pages 503-516, December.
    5. Gary Gereffi, 2020. "What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(3), pages 287-301, September.
    6. Algers, Jonas & Gong, Jindan & Nykvist, Björn & Åhman, Max, 2025. "Competition and climate policy in the steel transition: Comparing costs and subsidies in the US and the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Fu-Hsuan Chen & Hao-Ren Liu, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainable Development in Six Transformation Fields of the Central Taiwan Science Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Ioanna Kastelli & Lukasz Mamica & Keun Lee, 2023. "New perspectives and issues in industrial policy for sustainable development: from developmental and entrepreneurial to environmental state," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    10. Münch, Florian Anselm & Scheifele, Fabian, 2023. "Nurturing national champions? Local content in solar auctions and firm innovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    11. Reda Cherif & Fuad Hasanov, 2019. "The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy," IMF Working Papers 2019/074, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Michael Fuenfzig & Pietro Maggi & Corine Besseling & Anne Winkel & Michael Flickenschild & Przemysław Kowalski & Katarzyna Sidło & Anna Malinowska & Marek Peda & Christopher Hartwell & Patricia Augier, 2021. "Ex-post Evaluation of the impact of trade chapters of the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements with six partners: Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia," Working Papers hal-03435264, HAL.
    13. John Weiss & Adnan Seric, 2021. "Industrial policy: Clarifying options through taxonomy and decision trees," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 773-788, September.
    14. Jakub Szabó, 2022. "Political Economy of Illiberal Capitalism in Hungary and Poland," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(5), pages 617-637.
    15. Stöllinger, Roman & Leitner, Sandra M. & Zavarska, Zuzana, 2023. "Functional specialisation and working conditions in Europe," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 284, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    16. Calabrese, Linda & Cao, Yue, 2021. "Managing the Belt and Road: Agency and development in Cambodia and Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Gabor, Daniela & Braun, Benjamin, 2023. "Green macrofinancial regimes," SocArXiv 4pkv8, Center for Open Science.
    18. Klingler-Vidra, Robyn & Wade, Robert, 2020. "Science and technology policies and the middle-income trap: lessons from Vietnam," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100712, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Andrés Madariaga, 2020. "Targeting Industrial Policy on Business Services: Rationales and Design for the Case of Chile," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-06, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    20. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2019. "Trade Policy Space and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows," EconStor Preprints 196149, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
    • O54 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ipewps:313641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iphwrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.