IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iaqrep/301586.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zwischen institutioneller Verwilderung und Restrukturierung: Soziale Sicherung und industrielle Beziehungen in der Plattformökonomie

Author

Listed:
  • Hoose, Fabian
  • Beckmann, Fabian
  • Topal, Serkan
  • Glanz, Sabrina

Abstract

Die Geschäftsmodelle digitaler Plattformen lassen neue Formen der Selbstständigkeit entstehen und ziehen eine Aushöhlung erwerbsstrukturierender Institutionen nach sich. Digitale Plattformselbstständigkeiten kollidieren mit kollektiv-solidargemeinschaftlichen Regulierungsinstitutionen der sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Erste Initiativen deuten neue Formen der Interessenorganisierung in der Plattformökonomie an, wobei die Notwendigkeit institutioneller Innovationen bestehen bleibt. Der vorliegende Report entstand im Rahmen des Forschungsprojektes "Plattformökonomie und soziale Sicherung: Arbeits- und Sicherungsorientierungen digitaler Selbstständiger zwischen De- und Re-Institutionalisierung". Das Kooperationsprojekt zwischen dem Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation der Universität Duisburg-Essen und dem Lehrstuhl Soziologie/Arbeit, Wirtschaft und Wohlfahrt der Ruhr-Universität Bochum wird über einen Zeitraum von drei Jahren (2021 - 2024) im Rahmen des Fördernetzwerks Interdisziplinäre Sozialpolitikforschung (FIS) des Bundesministeriums für Arbeit und Soziales gefördert.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoose, Fabian & Beckmann, Fabian & Topal, Serkan & Glanz, Sabrina, 2022. "Zwischen institutioneller Verwilderung und Restrukturierung: Soziale Sicherung und industrielle Beziehungen in der Plattformökonomie," IAQ-Report 2022-11, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Work, Skills and Training (IAQ).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iaqrep:301586
    DOI: 10.17185/duepublico/77136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/301586/1/IAQ-Report-2022-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17185/duepublico/77136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Honneth, Axel, 2011. "Verwilderungen des sozialen Konflikts: Anerkennungskämpfe zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts," MPIfG Working Paper 11/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Kool, Tamara & Bordon, Giulio & Gassmann, Franziska, 2021. "Access to social protection for platform and other non-standard workers: A literature review," MERIT Working Papers 2021-002, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Mayo Fuster Morell & Ricard Espelt & Melissa Renau Cano, 2020. "Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections with the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Jan Drahokoupil, 2021. "The business models of labour platforms: Creating an uncertain future," Chapters, in: Jan Drahokoupil & Kurt Vandaele (ed.), A Modern Guide To Labour and the Platform Economy, chapter 2, pages 33-48, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Bonin, Holger & Rinne, Ulf, 2017. "Omnibusbefragung zur Verbesserung der Datenlage neuer Beschäftigungsformen," IZA Research Reports 80, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Sacha Garben, 2021. "The regulation of platform work in the European Union: Mapping the challenges," Chapters, in: Jan Drahokoupil & Kurt Vandaele (ed.), A Modern Guide To Labour and the Platform Economy, chapter 9, pages 145-161, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Christina Behrendt & Quynh Anh Nguyen & Uma Rani, 2019. "Social protection systems and the future of work: Ensuring social security for digital platform workers," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(3), pages 17-41, July.
    8. Lee, Horan & Staples, Ronald, 2018. "Digitale Solidarität unter Arbeitnehmer*innen [Digital Solidarity among workers]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 25(4), pages 495-517.
    9. Valentin Niebler, 2020. "‘YouTubers unite’: collective action by YouTube content creators," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(2), pages 223-227, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrey SHEVCHUK & Denis STREBKOV, 2023. "Digital platforms and the changing freelance workforce in the Russian Federation: A ten‐year perspective," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(1), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Rossella Bozzon & Annalisa Murgia, 2022. "Independent or Dependent? European Labour Statistics and Their (In)ability to Identify Forms of Dependency in Self-employment," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 199-226, February.
    3. Fedorets Alexandra & Kirchner Stefan & Adriaans Jule & Giering Oliver, 2022. "Data on Digital Transformation in the German Socio-Economic Panel," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 242(5-6), pages 691-705, December.
    4. Mayo Fuster Morell & Ricard Espelt & Enric Senabre Hidalgo, 2021. "Data for Sustainable Platform Economy: Connections between Platform Models and Sustainable Development Goals," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Xiaoxiao Zhou & Ryoga Miyauchi & Yuki Inoue, 2023. "Sustainable Fashion Product Innovation: Continuous Value of Apparel Products on Second-Hand Product Trading Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Heiland, Heiner, 2020. "Workers' Voice in platform labour: An Overview," WSI Studies 21, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    7. Daniel Erdsiek, 2021. "Unternehmen setzen verstärkt auf Crowdworking [Companies increasingly rely on crowdworking]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(11), pages 912-914, November.
    8. Berg, Marco & Cramer, Ralph & Dickmann, Christian & Gilberg, Reiner & Jesske, Birgit & Kleudgen, Martin & Beste, Jonas & Dummert, Sandra & Frodermann, Corinna & Schwarz, Stefan & Trappmann, Mark & Bäh, 2020. "Codebuch und Dokumentation des Panel 'Arbeitsmarkt und soziale Sicherung' (PASS) : Datenreport Welle 13," FDZ Datenreport. Documentation on Labour Market Data 202012_de, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    9. Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Agnes Kügler & Nicole Schmidt-Padickakudy, 2023. "Digitalisierung in Österreich: Fortschritt und Bedeutung der Plattformarbeit," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 96(7), pages 467-479, July.
    10. Pop, Luana Miruna, 2023. "Is no employment better than self-employment? The story of how Romania managed to create a class of ‘invisible’ and forgotten workers," SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 26(1), pages 7-46.
    11. Ana Diakonidze, 2023. "Internalising precariousness: experiences of Georgian platform workers," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(4), pages 439-455, November.
    12. Maier, Michael F. & Viete, Steffen & Ody, Margard, 2017. "Plattformbasierte Erwerbsarbeit: Stand der empirischen Forschung," IZA Research Reports 81, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Kirchner, Stefan & Matiaske, Wenzel, 2020. "Plattformökonomie und Arbeitsbeziehungen ‒ Digitalisierung zwischen imaginierter Zukunft und empirischer Gegenwart," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(2), pages 105-119.
    14. Meri Koivusalo & Arseniy Svynarenko & Benta Mbare & Mikko Perkiö, 2024. "Disruptive (dis)engagement: platformisation as a global social policy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Palmira Permata Bachtiar & Jimmy Daniel Berlianto Oley & Lia Amelia, "undated". "Accelerating Inclusive and Fair Digital Transformation to Anticipate Challenges Facing the Future of Work," Working Papers 3281, Publications Department.
    16. Bürgisser, Reto, 2023. "Policy Responses to Technological Change in the Workplace," SocArXiv kwxn2, Center for Open Science.
    17. Maciej Berk{e}sewicz & Dagmara Nikulin & Marcin Szymkowiak & Kamil Wilak, 2021. "The gig economy in Poland: evidence based on mobile big data," Papers 2106.12827, arXiv.org.
    18. Ernest Cañada & Carla Izcara & María José Zapata Campos, 2023. "Putting Fairness into the Gig Economy: Delivery Cooperatives as Alternatives to Corporate Platforms," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Corinna Funke & Georg Picot, 2021. "Platform work in a Coordinated Market Economy," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 348-363, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iaqrep:301586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaqdude.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.