IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/gigawp/292.html

Gender Politics, Authoritarian Regime Resilience, and the Role of Civil Society in Algeria and Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Lorch, Jasmin
  • Bunk, Bettina

Abstract

The question of whether and how authoritarian regimes may use gender politics to preserve their rule has attracted insufficient academic attention so far. Research on state feminism shows that non-democratic regimes often enact women-friendly policies for the purpose of maintaining power. However, this finding has not been linked to the broader research on authoritarian resilience. To address this research gap, we connect recent debates on authoritarian resilience to the research on state feminism. Subsequently, we engage in a cross-regional comparison of the use of gender politics by the authoritarian regimes of Algeria and Mozambique in order to enrich both sets of theory on the basis of empirical findings. Specifically, we ask what strategies the two authoritarian regimes employ in the areas of women's rights and gender and how these might contribute to regime resilience, focusing on the interactions between these regimes and civil society organisations (CSOs).

Suggested Citation

  • Lorch, Jasmin & Bunk, Bettina, 2016. "Gender Politics, Authoritarian Regime Resilience, and the Role of Civil Society in Algeria and Mozambique," GIGA Working Papers 292, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:gigawp:292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/147547/1/870609602.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerschewski, Johannes, 2013. "The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 13-38.
    2. Philomina E. Okeke–Ihejirika & Susan Franceschet, 2002. "Democratization and State Feminism: Gender Politics in Africa and Latin America," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 33(3), pages 439-466, June.
    3. Hoffmann, Bert, 2011. "The International Dimensions of Authoritarian Legitimation: The Impact of Regime Evolution," GIGA Working Papers 182, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jelena Lončar, 2024. "Autocratic Genderwashing: Gender‐Equality Reforms in Serbia," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wischermann, Jörg & Bunk, Bettina & Köllner, Patrick & Lorch, Jasmin, 2016. "Do Associations Support Authoritarian Rule? Tentative Answers from Algeria, Mozambique, and Vietnam," GIGA Working Papers 295, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    2. Yuen, Vera W.H., 2024. "From public health to political repression: COVID-19 lockdown measure in Hong Kong's opposition districts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    3. Ghazal Bayanpourtehrani & Kevin Sylwester, 2013. "Democracy and Female Labor Force Participation: An Empirical Examination," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 749-762, July.
    4. Maria‐Louise Clausen, 2020. "Decentralization as a strategy of regime maintenance: The case of Yemen," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(2), pages 119-128, May.
    5. Olga Filatova & Yury Kabanov & Yuri Misnikov, 2019. "Public Deliberation in Russia: Deliberative Quality, Rationality and Interactivity of the Online Media Discussions," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 133-144.
    6. Fenja Søndergaard Møller, 2019. "Blue blood or true blood: Why are levels of intrastate armed conflict so low in Middle Eastern monarchies?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(5), pages 517-544, September.
    7. Josua, Maria, 2022. "Justifications of repression in autocracies: An empirical analysis of the Maghreb, 2000-2010," GIGA Working Papers 331, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    8. Ryan H Murphy, 2020. "Does democracy die in recessions? A descriptive analysis of aggregate demand shortfalls and regime transition," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 63-76, February.
    9. Vakhtang Putkaradze, 2023. "The Dictator Dilemma: The Distortion of Information Flow in Autocratic Regimes and Its Consequences," Papers 2310.01666, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    10. Aydin-Cakir, Aylin & Akarçay, Ebru İlter, 2025. "When do governments attack the judiciary? The explanatory power of political corruption," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Caner Bakir, 2023. "The vicious circle of policy advisory systems and knowledge regimes in consolidated authoritarian regimes," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(3), pages 419-439.
    12. John Ishiyama & Marijke Breuning & Taekbin Kim, 2024. "Personalism and purges: Are personalist dictators more likely to engage in elite purges?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1180-1192, July.
    13. Kailitz, Steffen & Tanneberg, Dag, 2015. "Legitimation, Kooptation, Repression und das Überleben von Autokratien „im Umfeld autokratischer Wahlen". Eine Replik auf den Beitrag von Hans Lueders und Aurel Croissant," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(1/2), pages 73-82.
    14. Vadhanavisala Onvara, 2019. "Democracy Towards Authoritarianism Under Illiberal Populist Leaders in Hungary and Poland," Central and Eastern European Review, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 31-48, December.
    15. Seraphine F. Maerz & Carsten Q. Schneider, 2020. "Comparing public communication in democracies and autocracies: automated text analyses of speeches by heads of government," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 517-545, April.
    16. Schlumberger, Oliver, 2021. "Puzzles of political change in the Middle East: Political liberalisation, authoritarian resilience and the question of systemic change," IDOS Discussion Papers 5/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    17. Dukalskis, Alexander & Gerschewski, Johannes, 2020. "Adapting or Freezing? Ideological Reactions of Communist Regimes to a Post-Communist World," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 55(3), pages 511-532.
    18. Amaechi Vera Uche & Ikwuoma Sunday Udochukwu, 2024. "Gender Mainstreaming in Nigeria: A Historical Perspective," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(11), pages 1919-1927, November.
    19. Todor S. Lohwasser & Felix Hoch & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2022. "Strength in Stability: A Meta-Analysis of Family Firm Performance Moderated by Institutional Stability and Regime Type," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 117-158, January.
    20. Jinrui Xi, 2018. "Sustainable Legitimacy: Chinese Government Inspections and Public Approval of Village Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:gigawp:292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.