IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fubipe/22009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Datenschutz in der EU: Der Einfluss transnationaler Akteure auf die RFID-Empfehlung der Europäischen Kommission

Author

Listed:
  • Jeuck, Lukas

Abstract

Mit RFID steht seit wenigen Jahren eine Technologie zur Verfügung, die einerseits ein großes wirtschaftliches Potential besitzt, mit deren verbreitetem Einsatz andererseits jedoch auch datenschutzrechtliche Risiken einhergehen. Seit Mai 2009 existiert eine Kommissionsempfehlung zu diesem Thema. Dieser Artikel untersucht diese Policy darauf hin, welche Akteure die Ergebnisse des Politikformulierungsprozesses maßgeblich beeinflussten. Das zentrale Anliegen der Arbeit ist die Analyse des Gewichtes verschiedener von Theorien der europäischen Integration als besonders einflussreich erachteter Akteure. Da weder die Betrachtung der Mitgliedstaaten (Liberaler Intergouvernementalismus) noch die der Kommission (Neo-Funktionalismus) eine erschöpfende Erklärung bieten, wendet sich die Arbeit sowohl transgouvernementalen als auch transnationalen Akteuren zu und zeigt, dass beide Akteure wesentlichen Einfluss nehmen konnten. Abschließend wird ein erster Versuch unternommen, zu erklären, warum diese Akteure im vorliegenden Fall einflussreich waren, obwohl gemeinhin angenommen wird, dass ihr Gewicht für politische Entscheidungen in der EU minimal ist. Hierbei wird auf das Bedürfnis nach Expertise einerseits aber auch die geänderte Rolle transnationaler und transgouvernementaler Akteure in der Umsetzung nicht verbindlicher Governanceformen hingewiesen.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeuck, Lukas, 2009. "Datenschutz in der EU: Der Einfluss transnationaler Akteure auf die RFID-Empfehlung der Europäischen Kommission," PIPE - Papers on International Political Economy 2/2009, Free University Berlin, Center for International Political Economy.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fubipe:22009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/60249/1/630968217.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Moravcsik, 1993. "Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 473-524, December.
    2. Moravcsik, Andrew, 1991. "Negotiating the Single European Act: national interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 19-56, January.
    3. Newman, Abraham L., 2008. "Building Transnational Civil Liberties: Transgovernmental Entrepreneurs and the European Data Privacy Directive," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(1), pages 103-130, January.
    4. Moravcsik, Andrew, 1997. "Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 513-553, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olgun, Cenk, 2017. "The role of the Eastern member states in the European Union's energy and climate policy," IPE Working Papers 89/2017, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:483-506 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. José Luis Castro-Montero & Edwin Alblas & Arthur Dyevre & Nicolas Lampach, 2018. "The Court of Justice and treaty revision: A case of strategic leniency?," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 570-596, December.
    4. Paul Novosad & Eric Werker, 2019. "Who runs the international system? Nationality and leadership in the United Nations Secretariat," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, March.
    5. Mathieu Rousselin, 2012. "The EU as a Multilateral Rule Exporter - The Global Transfer of European Rules via International Organizations," KFG Working Papers p0048, Free University Berlin.
    6. Jean-Yves Pitarakis & George Tridimas, 2003. "Joint Dynamics of Legal and Economic Integration in the European Union," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 357-368, November.
    7. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    8. Thomas König & Thomas Bräuninger, 1998. "The Inclusiveness of European Decision Rules," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 10(1), pages 125-142, January.
    9. Beate Kohler-Koch, 1997. "The European Union Facing Enlargement: Still a System sui generis?," MZES Working Papers 20, MZES.
    10. Beyers, Jan, 1998. "Where does supranationalism come from? Ideas floating through the working groups of the Council of the European Union," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 2, November.
    11. Johannes Müller Gómez, 2023. "Show Me the Money: Side‐Payments and the Implementation of International Agreements in Federal Systems," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 312-326.
    12. Ben Rosamond, 2016. "Field of Dreams: the Discursive Construction of EU Studies, Intellectual Dissidence and the Practice of ‘Normal Science’," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 19-36, January.
    13. Gary Marks & Liesbet Hooghe & Kermit Blank, 1995. "European Integration and the State," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 7, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    14. Thomas König & Simon Hug, 2000. "Ratifying Maastricht," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(1), pages 93-124, February.
    15. Mark Aspinwall, 2002. "Preferring Europe," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(1), pages 81-111, March.
    16. Thomas Doleys, 2009. "Incomplete Contracting, Commission Discretion and the Origins of EU Merger Control," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 483-506, June.
    17. Agnes Katalin Koos & Kenneth Keulman, 2019. "Methodological Nationalism in Global Studies and Beyond," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Benczes, István, 2018. "Az euróövezet válságrendezése a liberális kormányköziség elméletének értelmezésében [Crisis management in the Euro Zone from the perspective of liberal inter-governmentalism]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 923-948.
    19. Tridimas, George & Tridimas, Takis, 2004. "National courts and the European Court of Justice: a public choice analysis of the preliminary reference procedure," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 125-145, June.
    20. Grimmel, Andreas & Li, Yuan, 2018. "The belt and road initiative: A hybrid model of regionalism," Working Papers on East Asian Studies 122/2018, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of East Asian Studies IN-EAST.
    21. Nathan Griffith, 2006. "“Deja Vu All Over Again:” Constitutional Economics and European legal Integration," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 15-29, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fubipe:22009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/polwiss/forschung/oekonomie/ipoe/index.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.