IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fomarb/75.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Customer Integration: Wettbewerbsvorteil durch intangible Faktoren. Erkenntnisse einer Studie aus dem Bereich der industriellen Fördertechnik

Author

Listed:
  • Schindler, Uwe

Abstract

[Vorwort] Die in der Forschung und mehr noch in der Praxis etablierten Denkschulen strategischen Managements nehmen vornehmlich die Anbieter und ihre Produkte bzw. Dienstleistungen in den Fokus: Im marktbasierten Ansatz verringert der Anbieter durch strategische Handlungen den Wettbewerbsdruck durch seine Konkurrenten, in dem er sich durch Preis- oder Produktdifferenzierung von ihnen absetzt, im ressourcenbasierten Ansatz wird analysiert, welche spezifischen Ressourcen den Anbieter dazu befähigen, sich in solcher Form von der Konkurrenz abzuheben. Es stellt sich die Frage, welche Erklärungskraft diese Ansätze entwickeln können, wenn die Rahmenbedingungen des Wettbewerbs die Möglichkeiten der Anbieter, Produktdifferenzierung zu betreiben, massiv einschränken. Der relational view bzw. beziehungsbasierte Ansatz des strategischen Managements - eine Weiterentwicklung des ressourcenbasierten Ansatzes - thematisiert die Optionen der Anbieter unter derartigen Bedingungen, auf der Basis besonderer Beziehungen zu den Nachfragern, Wettbewerbsvorteile erzielen zu können. Es ist das Verdienst dieses Textes - und der zugrundeliegenden Dissertation - das Erklärungspotenzial dieses Ansatzes im Rahmen der empirischen Analyse einer hochgradig regulierten Wettbewerbsbeziehung pointiert aufzuzeigen. Zum einen bereichert die vorliegende Analyse die Diskussion um Kundenintegration um strategische Facetten. Zum anderen liefern die gewonnenen Erkenntnisse über den strategischen Wert unterschiedlicher Formen der Kundenintegration im Prozess der Entscheidung für ein Angebot auch relevante Anhaltspunkte für die Handlungsoptionen von Unternehmen, die zwar auf weniger stark regulierten Märkten agieren, aber aufgrund anderer Rahmenbedingungen - etwa existierenden de-facto Industriestandards - wenig Möglichkeiten zur Produktdifferenzierung haben.

Suggested Citation

  • Schindler, Uwe, 2019. "Customer Integration: Wettbewerbsvorteil durch intangible Faktoren. Erkenntnisse einer Studie aus dem Bereich der industriellen Fördertechnik," Arbeitspapiere der FOM 75, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fomarb:75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/206650/1/168138048X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephan Duschek, 2004. "Inter-Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 15(1), pages 53-73.
    2. Stephan Duschek, 2004. "Inter-Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 53-73.
    3. Enke, Margit & Poznanski, Steffi, 2005. "Kundenintegration bei Finanzdienstleistungen," Freiberg Working Papers 2005/11, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafał Haffer, 2018. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement System Of Logistics Service Providers. A Conceptual Framework And Research Agenda," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 85-108.
    2. Jensen, Peter D. Ørberg, 2012. "A passage to India: A dual case study of activities, processes and resources in offshore outsourcing of advanced services," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 311-326.
    3. Zander, Katrin & Beske, Philip, 2014. "Happy Growers! Relationship Quality in the German Organic Apple Chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Dirksmeyer, Walter (Ed.) & Theuvsen, Ludwig (Ed.) & Kayser, Maike (Ed.), 2015. "Aktuelle Forschung in der Gartenbauökonomie: Tagungsband zum 1. Symposium für Ökonomie im Gartenbau am 27. November 2013 in der Paulinerkirche Göttingen," Thünen Reports 22, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    5. Dirksmeyer, Walter & Theuvsen, Ludwig & Kayser, Maike, 2015. "Aktuelle Forschung in der Gartenbauökonomie : Tagungsband zum 1. Symposium für Ökonomie im Gartenbau am 27. November 2013 in der Paulinerkirche Göttingen," Thünen Report 199110, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    6. John Hamilton, 2020. "The Strategic Change Matrix and Business Sustainability across COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Gretzinger, Susanne & Royer, Susanne, 2014. "Relational resources in value adding webs: The case of a Southern Danish firm cluster," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 117-131.
    8. Susanne Gretzinger, 2008. "Strategic Outsourcing in the German Engine Building Industry. An Empirical Study Based on the Resource Dependence Approach," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 19(3), pages 200-228.
    9. Reuter, Ute, 2011. "Der ressourcenbasierte Ansatz als theoretischer Bezugsrahmen: Grundlagen, Theoriebausteine und Prozessorientierung," Research Papers on Innovation, Services and Technology 3/2011, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Business Administration, Department I - Institute of Research & Development and Innovation Management.
    10. Anja Schmidt, 2009. "Relational View," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 129-137, May.
    11. Reuter, Ute, 2011. "Der relationale ressourcenbasierte Ansatz als Weiterentwicklung des ressourcenbasierten Ansatzes unter Einbezug externer Ressourcen," Research Papers on Innovation, Services and Technology 4/2011, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Business Administration, Department I - Institute of Research & Development and Innovation Management.
    12. Susanne Gretzinger & Holger Hinz & Wenzel Matiaske, 2010. "Cooperation in Innovation Networks: The Case of Danish and German SMEs," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 21(2), pages 193-216.
    13. Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya, 2020. "Development of a Typology Regarding CIF-CSR Initiatives Typology, Comprising of Conceptual Archetypes," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 55-66, March.
    14. Pulles, Niels J. & Schiele, Holger, 2013. "Social Capital Determinants of Preferential Resource Allocation in Regional Clusters," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 24(2), pages 96-113.
    15. Hanna Górska-Warsewicz & Sylwia Żakowska-Biemans & Maksymilian Czeczotko & Monika Świątkowska & Dagmara Stangierska & Ewa Świstak & Agnieszka Bobola & Julita Szlachciuk & Karol Krajewski, 2018. "Organic Private Labels as Sources of Competitive Advantage—The Case of International Retailers Operating on the Polish Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.
    16. Rafal Haffer, 2021. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement System of Logistics Service Providers vs. Supply Chain Performance: A Conceptual Framework," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 78-97.
    17. Vipul Chalotra, 2016. "Cooperation as an Imperative Link in Upholding Sturdy Business Relations," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3), pages 712-729, June.
    18. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2010. "Das Elend des Kompetenzbegriffs: Kompetenzkonstrukte in der aktuellen Unternehmenstheorie," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 3/2010, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    19. Francesco Chirico & Dianne H. B. Welsh & R. Duane Ireland & Philipp Sieger, 2021. "Family versus Non‐Family Firm Franchisors: Behavioural and Performance Differences," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 165-200, January.
    20. Fossas-Olalla, Marta & Minguela-Rata, Beatriz & López-Sánchez, José-Ignacio & Fernández-Menéndez, José, 2015. "Product innovation: When should suppliers begin to collaborate?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1404-1406.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fomarb:75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fommmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.