IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/282014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Green industrial policy: managing transformation under uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Lütkenhorst, Wilfried
  • Vidican, Georgeta
  • Altenburg, Tilman
  • Pegels, Anna

Abstract

This Discussion Paper presents a normative concept of green industrial policy, which is defined as encompassing any policy measure aimed at aligning the structure of a country’s economy with the needs of sustainable development within established planetary boundaries. The paper elaborates on the rationale of a green industrial policy, how it differs from conventional industrial policy, why it is faced with significantly bigger challenges, and how these can be met. Production and consumption patterns today are largely shaped by markets. However, markets fail to solve many of the environmental challenges the world is facing. Therefore, governments have to intervene, thus reclaiming the primacy of public policy in setting and implementing societal objectives. While safeguarding the sustainability of human life on our planet makes green industrial policy a highly normative undertaking, there is also a strong economic case for green industrial policy – the success stories of such ‘green’ frontrunners as Germany and Denmark demonstrate the competitiveness potential of the new technologies. However, as shown by decades of discussion on industrial policy, government intervention almost invariably brings about risks of political capture and government failure. Green industrial policy is thus not only governed by ethical norms, but also by politics. The risks of failure are magnified by the urgency and scale of today’s global environmental challenges, requiring particularly bold, comprehensive and well-orchestrated government intervention under high uncertainty. By highlighting lessons learned from practical cases of both success and failure, this paper shows how these risks can be, and have been, managed. This involves both the disruption of old pathways (with locked-in technologies and infrastructure as well as stranded assets) and the creation of new pathways responding to sustainability imperatives. The paper argues that a broad-based social vision needs to be forged – supported by change coalitions and coupled with policy process safeguards, openness to policy learning, and an alignment of green industrial policies with market mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Lütkenhorst, Wilfried & Vidican, Georgeta & Altenburg, Tilman & Pegels, Anna, 2014. "Green industrial policy: managing transformation under uncertainty," IDOS Discussion Papers 28/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:282014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199441/1/die-dp-2014-28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Zhaohui & Tan, Yafei, 2022. "Can green industrial policy promote green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 59-75.
    2. Jing Xu & Yongchun Yang & Zhuo Jia & Genying Chang & Yongjiao Zhang & Maoyuan Zhao & Wenrui Wang, 2023. "A Systematic Government-Driven Green Development Transformation Strategy with Chinese Characteristics: The Case Study of the Xining Metropolitan Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Vidican Auktor, Georgeta & Regeni, Giulio, 2017. "The developmental state in the 21st century: calling for a new social contract," IDOS Discussion Papers 5/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Altenburg, Tilman, 2014. "From combustion engines to electric vehicles: a study of technological path creation and disruption in Germany," IDOS Discussion Papers 29/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Weibo Jin & Lijie Xu & Shiping Wu & Yao Xu & Shiwen Han, 2023. "Green Development Policies for China’s Manufacturing Industry: Characteristics, Evolution, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Zhang, Yijun & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Yi & Jiang, Feitao, 2021. "Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-62.
    7. Tilman Altenburg & Wilfried Lütkenhorst, 2015. "Industrial Policy in Developing Countries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14726.
    8. Evelyn Dietsche, 2017. "New industrial policy and the extractive industries," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-161, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Andrade, Rodrigo & Griffith-Jones, Edward & Griffith-Jones, Stephany & Spratt, Stephen, 2017. "Investment in renewable energy, fossil fuel prices and policy implications for Latin America and the Caribbean," Financiamiento para el Desarrollo 41679, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    10. Venkataraman, Mahesh & Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna & Aisbett, Emma & Rahbari, Alireza & Jotzo, Frank & Lord, Michael & Pye, John, 2022. "Zero-carbon steel production: The opportunities and role for Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    11. Altenburg, Tilman & Bauer, Steffen & Brandi, Clara & Brüntrup, Michael & Malerba, Daniele & Never, Babette & Pegels, Anna & Stamm, Andreas & To, Jenny & Volz, Ulrich, 2022. "Ökologische Strukturpolitik: Ein starker Profilbaustein für die deutsche Entwicklungszusammenarbeit," IDOS Discussion Papers 8/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    12. Altenburg, Tilman & Kleinz, Maria & Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2016. "Directing structural change: from tools to policy," IDOS Discussion Papers 24/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    13. Guendalina Anzolin & Amir Lebdioui, 2021. "Three Dimensions of Green Industrial Policy in the Context of Climate Change and Sustainable Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 371-405, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Governance; Klimawandel;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:282014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.