IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cfswop/669.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agile methods in the German banking sector - some evidence on expectations, experiences and success factors

Author

Listed:
  • Brühl, Volker

Abstract

The importance of agile methods has increased in recent years, not only to manage software development processes but also to establish flexible and adaptive organisational structures, which are essential to deal with disruptive changes and build successful digital business strategies. This paper takes an industry-specific perspective by analysing the dissemination, objectives and relative popularity of agile frameworks in the German banking sector. The data provides insights into expectations and experiences associated with agile methods and indicates possible implementation hurdles and success factors. Our research provides the first comprehensive analysis of agile methods in the German banking sector. The comparison with a selected number of fintechs has revealed some differences between banks and fintechs. We found that almost all banks and fintechs apply agile methods in IT-related projects. However, fintechs have relatively more experience with agile methods than banks and use them more intensively. Scrum is the most relevant framework used in practice. Scaled agile frameworks are so far negligible in the German banking sector. Acceleration of projects is apparently the most important objective of deploying agile methods. In addition, agile methods can contribute to cost savings and lead to improved quality and innovation performance, though for banks it is evidently more challenging to reach their respective targets than for fintechs. Overall our findings suggest that German banks are still in a maturing process of becoming more agile and that there is room for an accelerated adoption of agile methods in general and scaled agile frameworks in particular.

Suggested Citation

  • Brühl, Volker, 2021. "Agile methods in the German banking sector - some evidence on expectations, experiences and success factors," CFS Working Paper Series 669, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cfswop:669
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3973149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/248404/1/1780523904.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2139/ssrn.3973149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adarsh Kumar Kakar, 2017. "Do Reflexive Software Development Teams Perform Better?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(5), pages 347-359, October.
    2. Christoph Schmidt, 2016. "Agile Software Development," Progress in IS, in: Agile Software Development Teams, chapter 0, pages 7-35, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damjan Vavpotič & Marko Robnik-Šikonja & Tomaž Hovelja, 2020. "Exploring the Relations Between Net Benefits of IT Projects and CIOs’ Perception of Quality of Software Development Disciplines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 347-360, August.
    2. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    3. Shivam Gupta & Vinayak A. Drave & Surajit Bag & Zongwei Luo, 2019. "Leveraging Smart Supply Chain and Information System Agility for Supply Chain Flexibility," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 547-564, June.
    4. Florin DUMITRIU & Gabriela MESNITA & Laura Diana RADU, 2019. "Challenges and Solutions of Applying Large-Scale Agile at Organization-al Level," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(3), pages 61-71.
    5. Berea Cristi, 2018. "Negotiation Analysis. The Context," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 284-288, July.
    6. Feldmann Anna, 2021. "The 5 P’s to success in intrapreneurial programs," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 71(1), pages 5-37, March.
    7. C. J. Torrecilla-Salinas & O. Troyer & M. J. Escalona & M. Mejías, 2019. "A Delphi-based expert judgment method applied to the validation of a mature Agile framework for Web development projects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-40, March.
    8. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Paloma Lanza‐León & Lidia Sanchez‐Ruiz & David Cantarero‐Prieto, 2021. "Kanban system applications in healthcare services: A literature review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 2062-2078, November.
    10. Čelesnik Goran & Radujković Mladen & Vrečko Igor, 2018. "Resolving Companies in Crisis: Agile Crisis Project Management," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(4), pages 223-237, December.
    11. Appiah, Gloria & Bonsu, Samuel K. & Sarpong, David, 2021. "The unpowered customer: Co-creation as tactics of the weak," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 317-326.
    12. Shikha Sharma & Sanjeev K. Sharma, 2020. "Probing the Links Between Team Resilience, Competitive Advantage, and Organizational Effectiveness: Evidence from Information Technology Industry," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 289-307, July.
    13. Robert Modransky & Silvia Jakabova & Michal Hanak & Albert Olah, 2020. "Lean and Agile Project Management and the Challenges for its Implementation in SMEs in Czech Republic," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 413-440, July.
    14. Mohamed Amine Ferrag & Leandros Maglaras & Abdelouahid Derhab & Helge Janicke, 2020. "Authentication schemes for smart mobile devices: threat models, countermeasures, and open research issues," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 317-348, February.
    15. K. C. Bhosale & P. J. Pawar, 2019. "Material flow optimisation of production planning and scheduling problem in flexible manufacturing system by real coded genetic algorithm (RCGA)," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 381-423, June.
    16. Aymeric Hemon & Barbara Lyonnet & Frantz Rowe & Brian Fitzgerald, 2020. "From Agile to DevOps: Smart Skills and Collaborations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 927-945, August.
    17. Volker Brühl, 2022. "Agile methods in the German banking sector: some evidence on expectations, experiences and success factors," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(8), pages 1337-1372, October.
    18. Islam, Gibrail & Storer, Tim, 2020. "A case study of agile software development for safety-Critical systems projects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    19. Evgeny Nikulchev & Dmitry Ilin & Alexander Gusev, 2021. "Technology Stack Selection Model for Software Design of Digital Platforms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, February.
    20. Jie Gao & Cui Huang & Jun Su & Qijun Xie, 2019. "Examining the Factors Behind the Success and Sustainability of China’s Creative Research Group: An Extension of the Teamwork Quality Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agile Methods; Scrum; Banking; FinTechs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cfswop:669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifkcfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.