IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cauman/626.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pricing the multiple-choice nested knapsack problem

Author

Listed:
  • Drexl, Andreas
  • Jørnsten, Kurt

Abstract

The multiple-choice nested knapsack problem (MCKP) is a generalization of the ordinary knapsack problem, where the set of items is partitioned into classes. The binary choice of selecting an item is replaced by taking exactly one item out of each class of items. Due to the fact that the MCKP is an NP-hard integer program dual prices are not readily available. In this paper we propose a family of linear programming models the optimal solution of which is integral for many instances. The models are evaluated experimentally using a well-defined testbed consisting of 9,000 instances. Overall our methodology produces an integral solution for 75% of the instances considered. In particular, for two out of five distribution types studied at least one of the models produces "almost always" an integral solution. Hence, in most of the cases there exists a linear price function that supports the optimal allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Drexl, Andreas & Jørnsten, Kurt, 2007. "Pricing the multiple-choice nested knapsack problem," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 626, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/147679/1/manuskript_626.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dudzinski, Krzysztof & Walukiewicz, Stanislaw, 1987. "Exact methods for the knapsack problem and its generalizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 3-21, January.
    2. Marshall L. Fisher, 1981. "The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Prabhakant Sinha & Andris A. Zoltners, 1979. "The Multiple-Choice Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 503-515, June.
    4. Pisinger, David, 1995. "A minimal algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 394-410, June.
    5. Nauss, Robert M., 1978. "The 0-1 knapsack problem with multiple choice constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 125-131, March.
    6. Barcia, Paulo & Jornsten, Kurt, 1990. "Improved Lagrangean decomposition: An application to the generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 84-92, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Briskorn, Dirk & Knust, Sigrid, 2008. "On Circular 2-Factorizations of the Complete Tripartite Graph," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 636, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong, Tao & Young, Rhonda, 2010. "Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem: Example of planning choice in transportation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 128-137, May.
    2. Ewa M. Bednarczuk & Janusz Miroforidis & Przemysław Pyzel, 2018. "A multi-criteria approach to approximate solution of multiple-choice knapsack problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 889-910, July.
    3. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Wilhelm, Wilbert E., 2007. "Three-stage approaches for optimizing some variations of the resource constrained shortest-path sub-problem in a column generation context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 564-577, December.
    4. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2008. "A versatile algorithm for assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 39-56, January.
    5. Pisinger, David, 1995. "A minimal algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 394-410, June.
    6. Abdelkader Sbihi, 2007. "A best first search exact algorithm for the Multiple-choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 337-351, May.
    7. Degraeve, Z. & Jans, R.F., 2003. "Improved Lower Bounds For The Capacitated Lot Sizing Problem With Set Up Times," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-026-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Mhand Hifi & Slim Sadfi & Abdelkader Sbihi, 2004. "An Exact Algorithm for the Multiple-choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem," Post-Print halshs-03322716, HAL.
    9. Yuji Nakagawa & Ross J. W. James & César Rego & Chanaka Edirisinghe, 2014. "Entropy-Based Optimization of Nonlinear Separable Discrete Decision Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 695-707, March.
    10. Tue R. L. Christensen & Kim Allan Andersen & Andreas Klose, 2013. "Solving the Single-Sink, Fixed-Charge, Multiple-Choice Transportation Problem by Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 428-438, August.
    11. Edward Y H Lin & Chung-Min Wu, 2004. "The multiple-choice multi-period knapsack problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 187-197, February.
    12. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Hassoun, Michael, 2020. "On the importance of variability when managing metrology capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 267-276.
    13. Mhand Hifi & Slim Sadfi & Abdelkader Sbihi, 2004. "An Exact Algorithm for the Multiple-choice Multidimensional Knapsack Problem," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03322716, HAL.
    14. Narciso, Marcelo G. & Lorena, Luiz Antonio N., 1999. "Lagrangean/surrogate relaxation for generalized assignment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 165-177, April.
    15. Johnston, Robert E. & Khan, Lutfar R., 1995. "Bounds for nested knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 154-165, February.
    16. Gasparini, Gaia & Brunelli, Matteo & Chiriac, Marius Dan, 2022. "Multi-period portfolio decision analysis: A case study in the infrastructure management sector," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    17. Sung, C. S. & Cho, Y. K., 2000. "Reliability optimization of a series system with multiple-choice and budget constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 159-171, November.
    18. Wishon, Christopher & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2016. "Robust efficiency measures for linear knapsack problem variants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 398-409.
    19. Lorena, Luiz Antonio N. & Narciso, Marcelo G., 1996. "Relaxation heuristics for a generalized assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 600-610, June.
    20. Vijay Aggarwal & Narsingh Deo & Dilip Sarkar, 1992. "The knapsack problem with disjoint multiple‐choice constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 213-227, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.