Sounding the Alarm on Inflation Indexing and Strict Inflation Targeting
Unanticipated inflation or deflation causes one party of a nominal contract to gain at the expense of the other party, an effect absent in macroeconomic models with one representative consumer or with consumers having identical consumption. In this paper's general dynamic and stochastic equilibrium model, diverse consumers maximize risk-averse utility and rent labor and land to profit-maximizing firms. Both inflation indexing and strict inflation targeting are Pareto inefficient. When Pareto sharing of changes of aggregate supply is proportional, nominal contracts under perfect nominal income targeting are Pareto efficient, while quasi-real contracts are Pareto efficient regardless.
|Date of creation:||29 Dec 2003|
|Date of revision:|
|Note:||Type of Document - pdf; prepared on WinXP; to print on HPLaserJet 8100 PCL6; pages: 41; figures: Figures included in text.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://126.96.36.199 |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0312010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.