IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa10p1262.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing the lived experience to objective measures of Accessibility

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Curl

    ()

  • John Nelson
  • Jillian Anable

Abstract

This paper presents work undertaken to date as part of PhD research into the process of Accessibility Planning in the UK and how existing objective measures of accessibility relate to individual perceptions or the "lived experience" of accessibility. Since 1997, Accessibility has been framed in the social exclusion context within UK transport planning and policy, focusing on the ability of people to participate fully in society, which is seen as being limited by poor accessibility. This approach recognises that factors other than spatial location are important and places importance on barriers to accessibility such as information, cost and, safety and security as well as provision of transport services and journey times (Social Exclusion Unit, 2003). Despite this recognition, accessibility measures and indicators tend to focus on the objective journey time or distance of people to destinations, and do not consider more subjective factors such as convenience, physical mobility, safety and cost. This research critically appraises dominant approaches to accessibility planning, reviewing current approaches based upon their practicality, data requirements and outcomes, before presenting a mixed methods, case study approach to understand how perceived or "lived" accessibility differs from currently used objective measures. Engagement with practitioners has led to a greater understanding of the requirements of policy makers in improving accessibility and how the process of accessibility planning links to desired policy outcomes. Primary fieldwork involves understanding individual perceptions and subjective accessibilities, to form comparison with existing objective measures of accessibility. This paper will present some preliminary results.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Curl & John Nelson & Jillian Anable, 2011. "Comparing the lived experience to objective measures of Accessibility," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1262, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p1262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa10/ERSA2010finalpaper1262.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p1262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.