The Impact of Educational Activities on Regional Development
A regionâ€šÃ„Ã´s pattern of growth depends on its power to attract economic activities and the right blend of people to run them. This power depends on economic and social factors that may be combined into a variable which is referred to as the Image of a region and has been presented in some earlier works (Angelis 1980,1990) The role of a regionâ€šÃ„Ã´s location is crucial for its development. Hence it is difficult for remote and isolated regions to attract economic activities involving production and transportation of tangible goods. An alternative way of development for such regions is to attract activities involving production of intangible goods. The provision of tertiary education is such an activity. Universities are traditionally are thought to affect both the economic and the social dimension of a region. Their key economic impacts on a given region, as identified by literature, are the increase of local disposable income and employment opportunities. Their key social impacts, on the other hand, include upgrading the human capital stock and raising the cultural level of the local community. The Image of a region has so far been expressed as a function of two Indicators, Economic and Social; furthermore each one of those is expressed as a function of a number of Multipliers related to economic and social aspects of a region. The goal of this paper is to use the concept of a regionâ€šÃ„Ã´s Image in order to measure the effect of universityâ€šÃ„Ã´s operation on the region of its location. Toward this end we: â€šÃ„Â¢ Define the Educational Multiplier of a region which expresses the impact of tertiary education aspects on the regionâ€šÃ„Ã´s development. â€šÃ„Â¢ Redefine the regionâ€šÃ„Ã´s Basic Image function so as to include the Educational Multiplier. â€šÃ„Â¢ Estimate a regionâ€šÃ„Ã´s Basic Image value twice, using the initial and the redefined Basic Image equation respectively, focus on the difference between the two values and suggest ways for maximizing the positive effect of Educational Multiplier on the regionâ€šÃ„Ã´s well being. The model developed is applied to selected regions and the results obtained are presented and discussed.
|Date of creation:||Sep 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.ersa.org
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Harvey Goldstein & Catherine Renault, 2004. "Contributions of Universities to Regional Economic Development: A Quasi-experimental Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7), pages 733-746.
- Reed, W. Robert & Rogers, Cynthia L., 2003. "A study of quasi-experimental control group methods for estimating policy impacts," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-25, January.
- Jaffe, Adam B, 1989. "Real Effects of Academic Research," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(5), pages 957-70, December.
- Sinclair, M Thea & Sutcliffe, Charles M S, 1982. "Keynesian Income Multipliers with First and Second Round Effects: An Application to Tourist Expenditure," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 44(4), pages 321-38, November.
- Brownrigg, M, 1973. "The Economic Impact of a New University," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 20(2), pages 123-39, June.
- Sinclair, M Thea & Sutcliffe, Charles M S, 1978. "The First Round of the Keynesian Regional Income Multiplier," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 25(2), pages 177-86, June.
- Zvi Griliches, 1979.
"Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth,"
Bell Journal of Economics,
The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 92-116, Spring.
- Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p1111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.