IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Educational Activities on Regional Development


  • Maria Mavri


  • Vasilis Angelis


  • Katerina Dimaki



A region's pattern of growth depends on its power to attract economic activities and the right blend of people to run them. This power depends on economic and social factors that may be combined into a variable which is referred to as the Image of a region and has been presented in some earlier works (Angelis 1980,1990) The role of a region's location is crucial for its development. Hence it is difficult for remote and isolated regions to attract economic activities involving production and transportation of tangible goods. An alternative way of development for such regions is to attract activities involving production of intangible goods. The provision of tertiary education is such an activity. Universities are traditionally are thought to affect both the economic and the social dimension of a region. Their key economic impacts on a given region, as identified by literature, are the increase of local disposable income and employment opportunities. Their key social impacts, on the other hand, include upgrading the human capital stock and raising the cultural level of the local community. The Image of a region has so far been expressed as a function of two Indicators, Economic and Social; furthermore each one of those is expressed as a function of a number of Multipliers related to economic and social aspects of a region. The goal of this paper is to use the concept of a region's Image in order to measure the effect of university's operation on the region of its location. Toward this end we: * Define the Educational Multiplier of a region which expresses the impact of tertiary education aspects on the region's development. * Redefine the region's Basic Image function so as to include the Educational Multiplier. * Estimate a region's Basic Image value twice, using the initial and the redefined Basic Image equation respectively, focus on the difference between the two values and suggest ways for maximizing the positive effect of Educational Multiplier on the region's well being. The model developed is applied to selected regions and the results obtained are presented and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Mavri & Vasilis Angelis & Katerina Dimaki, 2011. "The Impact of Educational Activities on Regional Development," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1111, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p1111

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Brownrigg, M, 1973. "The Economic Impact of a New University," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 20(2), pages 123-139, June.
    2. Jaffe, Adam B, 1989. "Real Effects of Academic Research," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(5), pages 957-970, December.
    3. Reed, W. Robert & Rogers, Cynthia L., 2003. "A study of quasi-experimental control group methods for estimating policy impacts," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-25, January.
    4. Harvey Goldstein & Catherine Renault, 2004. "Contributions of Universities to Regional Economic Development: A Quasi-experimental Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7), pages 733-746.
    5. Sinclair, M Thea & Sutcliffe, Charles M S, 1978. "The First Round of the Keynesian Regional Income Multiplier," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 25(2), pages 177-186, June.
    6. Sinclair, M Thea & Sutcliffe, Charles M S, 1982. "Keynesian Income Multipliers with First and Second Round Effects: An Application to Tourist Expenditure," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 44(4), pages 321-338, November.
    7. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters,in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p1111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.