IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/war/wpaper/2026-25.html

Biodiversity-oriented forest management aligns with societal preferences across Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Marek Giergiczny

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
    University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences)

  • Jette Bredahl

    (University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics)

  • Klaus Glenk

    (SRUC, Department of Rural Economy, Environment and Society)

  • Jürgen Meyerhoff

    (Technische Universität Berlin, Institute for Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning)

  • Jens Abildtrup

    (Université de Lorraine, Université de Strasbourg, AgroParisTech, CNRS, INRAE, BETA)

  • Fitalew Agimass Taye

    (Griffith University, Griffith Business School)

  • Wiktor Budziński

    (University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences)

  • Mikołaj Czajkowski

    (University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences)

  • Borys Draus

    (Bureau for Forest Management and Geodesy)

  • Michela Faccioli

    (University of Trento, School of International Studies and Department of Economics and Management)

  • Tomasz Gajderowicz

    (University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences)

  • Michael Getzner

    (TU Wien, Institute of Spatial Planning)

  • Tom X. Hackbarth

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Piotr Janiec

    (University of Agriculture in Krakow)

  • Thomas Lundhede

    (University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics)

  • Marius Mayer

    (Munich University of Applied Sciences, Department of Tourism)

  • Alistair McVittie

    (SRUC, Department of Rural Economy, Environment and Society)

  • Rachel Oh

    (National University of Singapore, Department of Geography)

  • Roland Olschewski

    (WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Economics and Social Sciences)

  • Henrique M. Pereira

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig)

  • Martin Quaas

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
    Leipzig University)

  • Jarosław Socha

    (University of Agriculture in Krakow)

  • Niels Strange

    (University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics)

  • Milan Ščasný

    (Charles University, Environment Centre
    Charles University, Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences)

  • Sviataslau Valasiuk

    (University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences)

  • Adam Wasiak

    (Regional Directorate of State Forests in Radom)

  • Néstor Fernández

    (German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig)

Abstract

Forests across Europe are undergoing rapid transformation as biodiversity loss and climate change reshape priorities for forest management. Strategies that promote biodiverse and structurally complex forests are increasingly advocated to enhance ecological resilience, yet they are often assumed to conflict with societal preferences, potentially limiting public support for conservation and restoration. We examined whether forest characteristics associated with biodiversity conservation and climate adaptation are consistently valued by society across Europe. We combined a visual discrete choice experiment involving 11,622 respondents from twelve European countries with a travel cost model to evaluate whether stated societal preferences were reflected in observed recreational behaviour. We then integrated harmonized preference estimates with continental forest inventory and remote-sensing data to map the spatial distribution of societal values associated with forest ecosystem condition. Across all countries, respondents consistently preferred forests characterized by taller canopies, greater tree-species richness, heterogeneous age structures, and more deadwood. These preferences closely aligned with observed visitation behaviour despite substantial differences in geography, accessibility, and recreational traditions. Spatial analyses further showed that forests with greater structural complexity consistently exhibited higher societal value. Our findings demonstrate that biodiversity-oriented forest management and societal values largely converge across Europe, suggesting that many interventions promoting ecological resilience can simultaneously strengthen public support for forest conservation and restoration, providing a stronger foundation for adaptive, multifunctional forest governance under global environmental change.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek Giergiczny & Jette Bredahl & Klaus Glenk & Jürgen Meyerhoff & Jens Abildtrup & Fitalew Agimass Taye & Wiktor Budziński & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Borys Draus & Michela Faccioli & Tomasz Gajderowicz , 2026. "Biodiversity-oriented forest management aligns with societal preferences across Europe," Working Papers 2026-25, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  • Handle: RePEc:war:wpaper:2026-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/download_file/624f3d4c-051f-414b-bdcb-832baf0ec562/4282
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cameron,A. Colin & Trivedi,Pravin K., 2013. "Regression Analysis of Count Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107667273.
    2. Englin, Jeffrey & Shonkwiler, J S, 1995. "Estimating Social Welfare Using Count Data Models: An Application to Long-Run Recreation Demand under Conditions of Endogenous Stratification and Truncation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 77(1), pages 104-112, February.
    3. Vallecillo, Sara & La Notte, Alessandra & Zulian, Grazia & Ferrini, Silvia & Maes, Joachim, 2019. "Ecosystem services accounts: Valuing the actual flow of nature-based recreation from ecosystems to people," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 196-211.
    4. David Edwards & Marion Jay & Franck S Jensen & Beatriz Lucas & Mariella Marzano & Claire C. Montagné-Huck & Andrew Peace & Gerhard Weiss, 2012. "Public preferences across europe for different forest stand types as site for recreation," Post-Print hal-02647764, HAL.
    5. Giergiczny, Marek & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Żylicz, Tomasz & Angelstam, Per, 2015. "Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 8-23.
    6. Filyushkina, Anna & Agimass, Fitalew & Lundhede, Thomas & Strange, Niels & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl, 2017. "Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 22-29.
    7. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387.
    8. Sacher, Philipp & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Mayer, Marius, 2022. "Evidence of the association between deadwood and forest recreational site choices," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Rupert Seidl & Dominik Thom & Markus Kautz & Dario Martin-Benito & Mikko Peltoniemi & Giorgio Vacchiano & Jan Wild & Davide Ascoli & Michal Petr & Juha Honkaniemi & Manfred J. Lexer & Volodymyr Trotsi, 2017. "Forest disturbances under climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 395-402, June.
    10. Kelly S. Fielding & Matthew J. Hornsey, 2026. "Understanding and reducing the intention–behaviour gap in climate action," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 16(6), pages 638-647, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agimass, Fitalew & Lundhede, Thomas & Panduro, Toke Emil & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl, 2018. "The choice of forest site for recreation: A revealed preference analysis using spatial data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 445-454.
    2. King, Peter M. & Dallimer, Martin & Lundhede, Thomas & Austen, Gail E. & Fisher, Jessica C. & Irvine, Katherine N. & Fish, Robert D. & Davies, Zoe G., 2025. "Stated preferences for the colours, smells, and sounds of biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Weller, Priska & Elsasser, Peter, 2018. "Preferences for forest structural attributes in Germany – Evidence from a choice experiment," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-9.
    4. D’Adamo, Francesco & Cáceres, Miquel De & Espelta, Josep Maria & Roces-Díaz, Jose Valentin & Descals, Adrià & Selwyn, Miriam & Lloret, Francisco & Martínez-Vilalta, Jordi, 2026. "Assessing ecosystem services resilience to drought and its drivers in mediterranean forests using a counterfactual, process-based modelling approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Ciesielski, Mariusz & Stereńczak, Krzysztof, 2021. "Using Flickr data and selected environmental characteristics to analyse the temporal and spatial distribution of activities in forest areas," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    6. Sato, Masayuki & Aoshima, Ippei & Chang, Youngho, 2021. "Connectedness to nature and the conservation of the urban ecosystem: Perspectives from the valuation of urban forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Sacher, Philipp & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Mayer, Marius, 2022. "Evidence of the association between deadwood and forest recreational site choices," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Filyushkina, Anna & Agimass, Fitalew & Lundhede, Thomas & Strange, Niels & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl, 2017. "Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 22-29.
    9. Pelletier, Marie-Chantale & Heagney, Elizabeth & Kovač, Mladen, 2021. "Valuing recreational services: A review of methods with application to New South Wales National Parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    10. Wan-Jiun Chen & Jihn-Fa Jan & Chih-Hsin Chung & Shyue-Cherng Liaw, 2025. "Exploring the Economic Viability of Agro-Ecotourism as a Climate Change Adaptation Measure: A Travel Cost Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Kim, Do-hun & Sjølie, Hanne K. & Aguilar, Francisco X., 2024. "Psychological distances to climate change and public preferences for biodiversity-augmenting attributes in family-owned production forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Chen, Roger B., 2018. "Models of count with endogenous choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 862-875.
    13. Nannan Kang & Erda Wang & Yang Yu, 2019. "Valuing forest park attributes by giving consideration to the tourist satisfaction," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(5), pages 711-733, August.
    14. Martínez-Jauregui, María & White, Piran C.L. & Touza, Julia & Soliño, Mario, 2019. "Untangling perceptions around indicators for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Grilli, Gianluca & Curtis, John & Hynes, Stephen & Landgraf, Gavin, 2017. "The value of tourist angling: a travel cost method estimation of demand for two destination salmon rivers in Ireland," Papers WP570, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    16. Nielsen, Anne Sofie Elberg & Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl, 2016. "Local consequences of national policies - A spatial analysis of preferences for forest access reduction," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 68-77.
    17. Herriges, Joseph A. & Phaneuf, Daniel J. & Tobias, Justin L., 2008. "Estimating demand systems when outcomes are correlated counts," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 282-298, December.
    18. Jamal Othman & Yaghoob Jafari, 2019. "Economic Valuation of an Urban Lake Recreational Park: Case of Taman Tasik Cempaka in Bandar Baru Bangi, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Murphy, Martin & Cullen, Paula & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Ní Dhubháin, Áine, 2024. "A natural experiment: Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon forest recreation use and preferences in Ireland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    20. Pormon, Miah Maye M. & Ureta, Joan U. & Motallebi, Marzieh & Vassalos, Michael, 2026. "Incentivizing climate-smart forestry: Analyzing forest landowners' willingness to accept incentives for extended forest rotation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q26 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:war:wpaper:2026-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jacek Rapacz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fesuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.