Spurious Inference in the GARCH(1,1) Model When It Is Weakly Identified
This paper shows that the Zero-Information-Limit-Condition (ZILC) formulated by Nelson and Startz (2006) holds in the GARCH(1,1) model. As a result, the GARCH estimate tends to have too small a standard error relative to the true one when the ARCH parameter is small, even when sample size becomes very large. In combination with an upward bias in the GARCH estimate, the small standard error will often lead to the spurious inference that volatility is highly persistent when it is not. We develop an empirical strategy to deal with this issue and show how it applies to real datasets.
|Date of creation:||Mar 2007|
|Date of revision:||Mar 2007|
|Publication status:||Published in Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, Volume Vol.11, Article 1|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Box 353330, Seattle, WA 98193-3330|
Web page: http://www.econ.washington.edu/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udb:wpaper:uwec-2006-14-p. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael Goldblatt)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.