IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tse/wpaper/127752.html

Climate Patents and Financial Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Hege, Ulrich
  • Pouget, Sébastien
  • Zhang, Yifei

Abstract

We study the impact of climate patents on financial markets. Exploiting quasi-random variations in patent examiner leniency, we show that firms are rewarded with significant positive stock returns over a 12-month horizon when they receive fortuitous climate patent grants, compared with similarly innovative but unlucky firms. We ob-serve concomitant trends of reduced costs of capital, shareholder rotations towards environment-focused institutional investors and better environmental ratings. We do not observe similar reactions for other patents, including other green patents. We cor-roborate the distinctive nature of the market reaction to climate innovation by showing that it is amplified during periods of high attention to climate change, for firms with high climate exposure, and for first-time grants of climate patents. Random grants of climate patents do not produce improvements in the innovator’s operating perfor-mance or carbon emissions, but the underlying climate technologies do, suggesting that financial markets react rationally to the signal value of climate patent grants.

Suggested Citation

  • Hege, Ulrich & Pouget, Sébastien & Zhang, Yifei, 2023. "Climate Patents and Financial Markets," TSE Working Papers 23-1400, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Dec 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:127752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2023/wp_tse_1400.pdf
    File Function: Working paper
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joan Farre‐Mensa & Deepak Hegde & Alexander Ljungqvist, 2020. "What Is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent “Lottery”," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(2), pages 639-682, April.
    2. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 2015. "A five-factor asset pricing model," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 1-22.
    3. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2022. "Dissecting green returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 403-424.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kimura, Yosuke, 2024. "Market-based patent value of green transformation technologies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Borsuk, Marcin & Eugster, Nicolas & Klein, Paul-Olivier & Kowalewski, Oskar, 2024. "Family firms and carbon emissions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Alam, Afroza & Diegmann, André, 2026. "Patents, firm rents, and worker compensation: Causal evidence from quasi-random patent allocation," ZEW Discussion Papers 26-022, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Hege, Ulrich & Li, Kai & Zhang, Yifei, 2025. "Climate Innovation and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Supply Chain Networks," TSE Working Papers 25-1608, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    5. Anshita Sachan & Swapnanil SenGupta, 2026. "Climate Financing and FDI Impacts on Renewable Energy Consumption for Sustainable Development in BRICS+," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 802-820, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cong Wang, 2024. "Stock return prediction with multiple measures using neural network models," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, December.
    2. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Yilmaz, Berna N., 2025. "Tech firms and the renewable energy sector: Exploring the moderating effects of institutional ownership on financial connectedness," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Stephen P. Ferris & Jan Hanousek, Jr. & Jan Hanousek & Jolana Stejskalova, 2025. "The Power of the Crowd: Retail Investors and the Cost of Capital," MENDELU Working Papers in Business and Economics 2025-105, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    4. Lars Hornuf & Gül Yüksel, 2022. "The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 9724, CESifo.
    5. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    6. Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Chasing the ESG factor," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Alona Bilokha & Mingying Cheng & Mengchuan Fu & Iftekhar Hasan, 2025. "Understanding CSR champions: a machine learning approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 347(1), pages 761-774, April.
    8. Alves, Rómulo & Krüger, Philipp & van Dijk, Mathijs, 2025. "Drawing up the bill: Are ESG ratings related to stock returns around the world?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Hambel, Christoph & van der Sanden, Floor, 2025. "Reevaluating the carbon premium: Evidence of green outperformance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Rojo-Suárez, Javier & Alonso-Conde, Ana B., 2024. "Have shifts in investor tastes led the market portfolio to capture ESG preferences?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Andrew W. Lo & Ruixun Zhang, 2025. "Performance Attribution for Portfolio Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7537-7559, September.
    12. Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Dam, Lammertjan, 2023. "The contributions of betas versus characteristics to the ESG premium," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 104-124.
    13. Stoffman, Noah & Woeppel, Michael & Yavuz, M. Deniz, 2022. "Small innovators: No risk, No return," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1).
    14. Badía, Guillermo & Cortez, Maria Céu & Silva, Florinda, 2024. "Do investors benefit from investing in stocks of green bond issuers?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    15. Wei Zhang & Xinyu Li & Guanying Wang & Xiangqian Li, 2026. "Environmental pollution and IPO pricing efficiency: evidence from heavily polluting firms in China," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 757-798, February.
    16. Cerqueti, Roy & Stefanelli, Kevyn, 2025. "Spotlighting energy sector through green transition attention," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    17. David Ardia & Keven Bluteau & Kris Boudt & Koen Inghelbrecht, 2023. "Climate Change Concerns and the Performance of Green vs. Brown Stocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7607-7632, December.
    18. Andrew W. Lo & Ruixun Zhang, 2024. "Quantifying the Impact of Impact Investing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(10), pages 7161-7186, October.
    19. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Yilmaz, Berna N., 2024. "Energy transition and non-energy firms’ financial performance: Do markets value capability-based energy transition strategies?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    20. Coqueret, Guillaume & Giroux, Thomas & Zerbib, Olivier David, 2025. "The biodiversity premium," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:127752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsetofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.