IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20150102.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assigning Multiple Job Types to Parallel Specialized Servers

Author

Listed:
  • Dinard van der Laan

    (VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands)

Abstract

In this paper methods of mixing decision rules are investigated and applied to the so-called multiple job type assignment problem with specialized servers which is modeled as continuous time Markov decision process. Performance optimization is difficult for this assignment problem, but optimization over the class of static policies is tractable. By applying the described mixing methods a suitable static decision rule is mixed with some dynamic decision rules which are easy to describe and implement. For the discussed mixing methods optimization is performed over corresponding classes of so-called mixing policies. These mixing policies are still easy to describe and implement and for all investigated instances the optimized mixing policies perform substantially better than optimal static policies. Moreover, the optimized mixing policies perform better than stationary dynamic policies which apply at decision epochs one of the dynamic rules to which the mixing methods have been applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinard van der Laan, 2015. "Assigning Multiple Job Types to Parallel Specialized Servers," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-102/III, Tinbergen Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20150102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/15102.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard F. Serfozo, 1979. "Technical Note—An Equivalence Between Continuous and Discrete Time Markov Decision Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 616-620, June.
    2. Mor Armony & Amy R. Ward, 2010. "Fair Dynamic Routing in Large-Scale Heterogeneous-Server Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 624-637, June.
    3. Bruce Hajek, 1985. "Extremal Splittings of Point Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 543-556, November.
    4. Becker, K. J. & Gaver, D. P. & Glazebrook, K. D. & Jacobs, P. A. & Lawphongpanich, S., 2000. "Allocation of tasks to specialized processors: A planning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 80-88, October.
    5. Hong Chen & Heng-Qing Ye, 2012. "Asymptotic Optimality of Balanced Routing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 163-179, February.
    6. Hyytiä, Esa & Penttinen, Aleksi & Aalto, Samuli, 2012. "Size- and state-aware dispatching problem with queue-specific job sizes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 357-370.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong, Zhiheng & Cao, Ping, 2023. "Balanced routing with partial information in a distributed parallel many-server queueing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 618-633.
    2. Cao, Ping & Zhong, Zhiheng & Huang, Junfei, 2021. "Dynamic routing in a distributed parallel many-server service system: The effect of ξ-choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 219-235.
    3. P S Ansell & K D Glazebrook & C Kirkbride, 2003. "Generalised ‘join the shortest queue’ policies for the dynamic routing of jobs to multi-class queues," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(4), pages 379-389, April.
    4. Amy R. Ward & Mor Armony, 2013. "Blind Fair Routing in Large-Scale Service Systems with Heterogeneous Customers and Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 228-243, February.
    5. R. Sudhesh & P. Savitha & S. Dharmaraja, 2017. "Transient analysis of a two-heterogeneous servers queue with system disaster, server repair and customers’ impatience," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 179-205, April.
    6. Xiuli Chao & Frank Y. Chen, 2005. "An Optimal Production and Shutdown Strategy when a Supplier Offers an Incentive Program," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 130-143, March.
    7. Dwi Ertiningsih & Sandjai Bhulai & Flora Spieksma, 2018. "A novel use of value iteration for deriving bounds for threshold and switching curve optimal policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(8), pages 638-659, December.
    8. Nicole Leder & Bernd Heidergott & Arie Hordijk, 2010. "An Approximation Approach for the Deviation Matrix of Continuous-Time Markov Processes with Application to Markov Decision Theory," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 918-932, August.
    9. Daniel Freund & Shane G. Henderson & Eoin O’Mahony & David B. Shmoys, 2019. "Analytics and Bikes: Riding Tandem with Motivate to Improve Mobility," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 310-323, September.
    10. Cao, Ping & Zhong, Zhiheng, 2025. "Asymptotically optimal routing of a many-server parallel queueing system with long-run average criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(2), pages 462-475.
    11. Dmitry Efrosinin & Natalia Stepanova & Janos Sztrik & Andreas Plank, 2020. "Approximations in Performance Analysis of a Controllable Queueing System with Heterogeneous Servers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Dongyuan Zhan & Gideon Weiss, 2018. "Many-server scaling of the N-system under FCFS–ALIS," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 27-71, February.
    13. Xufeng Yang & Wen Jiao & Juliang Zhang & Hong Yan, 2022. "Capacity management for a leasing system with different equipment and batch demands," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 3004-3020, July.
    14. Adan, Ivo J.B.F. & Boon, Marko A.A. & Weiss, Gideon, 2019. "Design heuristic for parallel many server systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 259-277.
    15. J. G. Dai & Pengyi Shi, 2019. "Inpatient Overflow: An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 894-911, October.
    16. Jianmin Shi, 2025. "Superposed semi-Markov decision process with application to optimal maintenance systems," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Xiaoying Liang & Houmin Yan, 2014. "Inventory control and replenishment with flexible delivery‐time upgrade," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(5), pages 418-426, August.
    18. Chihoon Lee & Amy R. Ward & Heng-Qing Ye, 2021. "Stationary distribution convergence of the offered waiting processes in heavy traffic under general patience time scaling," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 283-303, December.
    19. Ibrahim, Rouba & L’Ecuyer, Pierre & Shen, Haipeng & Thiongane, Mamadou, 2016. "Inter-dependent, heterogeneous, and time-varying service-time distributions in call centers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 480-492.
    20. Noa Zychlinski, 2023. "Applications of fluid models in service operations management," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 161-185, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Job Assignment; Specialized Servers; Markov Decision Process; Mixing Decision Rules;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20150102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.