IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecf9/911.html

Hedging Options under Transaction Costs and Stochastic Volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Roy Kouwenberg

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Jacek Gondzio

    (University of Edinburgh)

  • Ton Vorst

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of hedging a contingent claim on a stock under transaction-costs and stochastic volatility. Extensive research during the last two decades has clearly demonstrated that the volatility of most stocks is not constant over time. Writers of over-the-counter stock options should take account of the effects of stochastic volatility while pricing and hedging contracts, as the volatility of the underlying is the crucial factor in estimating the price of options. Pricing methods for options under stochastic volatility processes are widely available, but practical methods for hedging under stochastic volatility are rare. The simple delta-vega hedging scheme adds option contracts to the portfolio in order to neutralize the volatility exposure during a short interval of time. This method requires frequent rebalancing of the portfolio, which could be costly due to the bid-ask spread on traded option contracts. Static hedging aims at replication of the final payoff with a fixed portfolio of traded options. The static hedging approach fails however when the traded claims do not match the maturity and the moneyness of the over-the-counter products. In this paper we use a stochastic optimization approach to construct short term delta-vega hedges that take account of future rebalancing and transaction costs. The size of the stochastic optimization model grows exponentially with the number of trading dates considered. We show that the decomposition method PDCGM combined with the interior point solver HOPDM allows for an efficient implementation of the stochastic optimization model in a parallel computing environment. This integration of high performance computing and state-of-the-art decomposition methods provides the means for solving the stochastic volatility hedging model with multiple portfolio rebalancing dates.

Suggested Citation

  • Roy Kouwenberg & Jacek Gondzio & Ton Vorst, 1999. "Hedging Options under Transaction Costs and Stochastic Volatility," Computing in Economics and Finance 1999 911, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Xiao-Jian & Wang, Zi-Ling & Xiao, Wei-Lin, 2020. "Is the nonlinear hedge of options more effective?—Evidence from the SSE 50 ETF options in China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Christian Pape & Oliver Woll & Christoph Weber, "undated". "Estimating the value of flexibility from real options: On the accuracy of hybrid electricity price models," EWL Working Papers 1804, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics.
    3. Blomvall, Jörgen & Hagenbjörk, Johan, 2022. "Reducing transaction costs for interest rate risk hedging with stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1282-1293.
    4. Barletta, Andrea & Santucci de Magistris, Paolo & Sloth, David, 2019. "It only takes a few moments to hedge options," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 251-269.
    5. Pieter Klaassen, 2002. "Comment on "Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(11), pages 1512-1516, November.
    6. C. Atkinson & S. Kazantzaki, 2009. "Double knock-out Asian barrier options which widen or contract as they approach maturity," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 329-340.
    7. Libo Yin & Liyan Han, 2020. "International Assets Allocation with Risk Management via Multi-Stage Stochastic Programming," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 55(2), pages 383-405, February.
    8. Mathias Barkhagen & Jörgen Blomvall, 2016. "Modeling and evaluation of the option book hedging problem using stochastic programming," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 259-273, February.
    9. Alet Roux, 2007. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under proportional transaction costs," Papers 0710.2758, arXiv.org.
    10. Fahlenbrach, Rüdiger & Sandås, Patrik, 2009. "Co-movements of index options and futures quotes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 151-163, January.
    11. Johannes Siven & Rolf Poulsen, 2009. "Auto-static for the people: risk-minimizing hedges of barrier options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 193-211, October.
    12. Barro, Diana & Consigli, Giorgio & Varun, Vivek, 2022. "A stochastic programming model for dynamic portfolio management with financial derivatives," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    13. Blomvall, Jorgen & Lindberg, Per Olov, 2003. "Back-testing the performance of an actively managed option portfolio at the Swedish Stock Market, 1990-1999," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1099-1112, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf9:911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.