IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rsw/rswwps/rswwps184.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Datenmanagement und Data Sharing. Erfahrungen in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Huschka
  • Claudia Oellers
  • Notburga Ott
  • Gert G. Wagner

Abstract

Die Menge der für Forschungszwecke zur Verfügung stehenden Daten vergrößert sich beständig (King, 2011). Jedoch werden unter Daten in den verschiedenen wissenschaftlichen Disziplinen ganz unterschiedliche Dinge gefasst. Aus dem lateinischen kommend bezeichnet ein Datum zunächst einmal etwas „Gegebenes“. In den Geowissenschaften können Daten Eisbohrkerne sein, aber auch numerische Geokoordinaten. In den Geschichtswissenschaften können Daten das Format alter Dokumente haben. In der Medizin können es auch biologische Proben oder Laborwerte sein. In den quantitativ empirisch arbeitenden Sozial-, Verhaltensund Wirtschaftswissenschaften ist das „gängige“ Format der einschlägigen Daten das von Zahlen als Teil von Datenmatrizen oder Tabellen...

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Huschka & Claudia Oellers & Notburga Ott & Gert G. Wagner, 2011. "Datenmanagement und Data Sharing. Erfahrungen in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften," RatSWD Working Papers 184, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    • Handle: RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.konsortswd.de/wp-content/uploads/RatSWD_WP_184.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erich Weichselgartner, 2011. "Disziplinenspezifische Aspekte des Archivierens von Forschungsdaten am Beispiel der Psychologie," RatSWD Working Papers 179, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    2. Stefan Winkler-Nees, 2011. "Anforderungen an wissenschaftliche Informationsinfrastrukturen," RatSWD Working Papers 180, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    3. Heather A Piwowar & Roger S Day & Douglas B Fridsma, 2007. "Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(3), pages 1-5, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0037552 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0188511 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Garret Christensen & Allan Dafoe & Edward Miguel & Don A Moore & Andrew K Rose, 2019. "A study of the impact of data sharing on article citations using journal policies as a natural experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick & Mueller-Langer, Frank, 2014. "Open access to data: An ideal professed but not practised," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1621-1633.
    5. Benedikt Fecher & Sascha Friesike & Marcel Hebing, 2014. "What Drives Academic Data Sharing?," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 655, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Javier Martínez-Vega & David Rodríguez-Rodríguez, 2022. "Protected Area Effectiveness in the Scientific Literature: A Decade-Long Bibliometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Mark J. McCabe & Frank Mueller-Langer, 2019. "Does Data Disclosure Increase Citations? Empirical Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Leading Economics Journals," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2019-02, Joint Research Centre.
    8. repec:plo:pbio00:1002506 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Harper, Lindsey M. & Kim, Youngseek, 2018. "Attitudinal, normative, and resource factors affecting psychologists’ intentions to adopt an open data badge: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 23-32.
    10. repec:plo:pbio00:2002846 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:osf:socarx:4bw9e_v3 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. repec:plo:pone00:0092590 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Kai Li & Jason Rollins & Erjia Yan, 2018. "Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 1-20, April.
    14. repec:plo:pone00:0230416 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Keren Weinshall & Lee Epstein, 2020. "Developing High‐Quality Data Infrastructure for Legal Analytics: Introducing the Israeli Supreme Court Database," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 416-434, June.
    16. Alishah Mawji & Holly Longstaff & Jessica Trawin & Dustin Dunsmuir & Clare Komugisha & Stefanie K Novakowski & Matthew O Wiens & Samuel Akech & Abner Tagoola & Niranjan Kissoon & J Mark Ansermino, 2022. "A proposed de-identification framework for a cohort of children presenting at a health facility in Uganda," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(8), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Renata Gonçalves Curty & Kevin Crowston & Alison Specht & Bruce W Grant & Elizabeth D Dalton, 2017. "Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Barbara McGillivray & Paola Marongiu & Nilo Pedrazzini & Marton Ribary & Mandy Wigdorowitz & Eleonora Zordan, 2022. "Deep Impact: A Study on the Impact of Data Papers and Datasets in the Humanities and Social Sciences," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-40, October.
    19. Eirini Delikoura & Dimitrios Kouis, 2021. "Open Research Data and Open Peer Review: Perceptions of a Medical and Health Sciences Community in Greece," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Colléter, Mathieu & Valls, Audrey & Guitton, Jérôme & Gascuel, Didier & Pauly, Daniel & Christensen, Villy, 2015. "Global overview of the applications of the Ecopath with Ecosim modeling approach using the EcoBase models repository," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 302(C), pages 42-53.
    21. repec:plo:pone00:0239283 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Anneke Zuiderwijk, 2024. "Researchers’ Willingness and Ability to Openly Share Their Research Data: A Survey of COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Factors," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, March.
    23. Doris Bambey & Louise Corti & Michael Diepenbroek & Heidemarie Hanekop & Betina Hollstein & Sabine Imeri & Hubert Knoblauch & Susanne Kretzer & Christian Meier zu Verl & Christian Meyer & Alexia Meyer, 2018. "Archivierung und Zugang zu Qualitativen Daten," RatSWD Working Papers 267, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
    24. Liwei Zhang & Liang Ma, 2021. "Does open data boost journal impact: evidence from Chinese economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3393-3419, April.
    25. Iman Tahamtan & Askar Safipour Afshar & Khadijeh Ahamdzadeh, 2016. "Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(3), pages 1195-1225, June.
    26. Shibayama, Sotaro & Lawson, Cornelia, 2021. "The use of rewards in the sharing of research resources," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    27. Ehsan Mohammadi & Mike Thelwall, 2013. "Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 383-395, November.
    28. repec:osf:socarx:4bw9e_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    29. Jennifer C Molloy, 2012. "The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science," Working Papers id:4686, eSocialSciences.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RatSWD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rtswdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.