IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/ibrief/ib-24-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On Deck for Treasury: The Inflation Reduction Act’s New Approach to Clean Electricity Tax Credits

Author

Listed:
  • Bergman, Aaron

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Rennert, Kevin

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

For decades now, the heart of US federal policy support to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has been a set of tax incentives for producing clean electricity and putting into service new clean electricity generators. These tax credits, along with state-level policies to require renewable and low-carbon electricity, are widely credited as the fundamental driver of emission reductions in the United States over the past decades. But they’ve always had some issues. They were inconsistent, being extended for short periods and at times expiring completely, leading to considerable investment uncertainty for developers. The credits themselves varied by technology and could be hard to monetize. And the rules were pretty inflexible: in order for a new technology to be eligible for the credit, it had to be named in the statute, requiring an act of Congress. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) sought to address many of these issues by transitioning in 2025 to a new set of technology-inclusive credits for electricity: the “clean energy production credit” (26 USC 45Y) and the “clean energy investment credit” (26 USC 48E). Instead of listing various technologies, in these new provisions, the IRA allowed technologies to qualify if they satisfy one seemingly simple condition: that their emissions are at most zero. Multiple model projections of the IRA (see here and here) have suggested that these tax credits are the single most important driver of IRA-attributable emissions reductions over the next decade, so much of the success of the IRA in reducing emissions hinges on their successful implementation by the US Department of the Treasury. Despite this significance and the looming deadline for the transition, however, there has been relatively little public discussion around their implementation, even as there are some potentially complicated issues for Treasury to work through. This situation stands in contrast to the robust conversation that’s been had over design of the 45V production tax credit for hydrogen, among others. In this issue brief, we give an overview of the tax credits and some potential challenges we see for their implementation in the hopes of stimulating timely discussion on issues Treasury will likely need to address in its forthcoming guidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Bergman, Aaron & Rennert, Kevin, 2024. "On Deck for Treasury: The Inflation Reduction Act’s New Approach to Clean Electricity Tax Credits," RFF Issue Briefs 24-02, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:ibrief:ib-24-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4476/IB_24-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John E. T. Bistline & Geoffrey Blanford & John Grant & Eladio Knipping & David L. McCollum & Uarporn Nopmongcol & Heidi Scarth & Tejas Shah & Greg Yarwood, 2022. "Economy-wide evaluation of CO2 and air quality impacts of electrification in the United States," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huntington, Hillard, 2025. "Do high power prices slow electrification? Some panel data evidence," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Powell, Siobhan & Martin, Sonia & Rajagopal, Ram & Azevedo, Inês M.L. & de Chalendar, Jacques, 2024. "Future-proof rates for controlled electric vehicle charging: Comparing multi-year impacts of different emission factor signals," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. John Bistlinea & Chikara Onda & Morgan Browning & Johannes Emmerling & Gokul Iyer & Megan Mahajan & Jim McFarland & Haewon McJeon & Robbie Orvis & Francisco Ralston Fonseca & Christopher Roney & Noah , 2024. "Equity Implications of Net-Zero Emissions: A Multi-Model Analysis of Energy Expenditures Across Income Classes Under Economy-Wide Deep Decarbonization Policies," Papers 2405.18748, arXiv.org.
    4. Pan, Weijie & Shittu, Ekundayo, 2025. "Assessment of mobility decarbonization with carbon tax policies and electric vehicle incentives in the U.S," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 379(C).
    5. Maxwell Woody & Gregory A. Keoleian & Parth Vaishnav, 2023. "Decarbonization potential of electrifying 50% of U.S. light-duty vehicle sales by 2030," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Maxwell Woody & Shawn A. Adderly & Rushabh Bohra & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2024. "Electric and gasoline vehicle total cost of ownership across US cities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 194-215, April.
    7. Kieran Winter & Zhirong Liao & Erik Abbá & Jose A. Robles Linares & Dragos Axinte, 2024. "Effect of sub-micron deformations at opposing strain rates on the micromagnetic behaviour of non-oriented electrical steel," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Kangxin An & Xinzhu Zheng & Jianxiang Shen & Canyang Xie & Can Wang & Wenjia Cai & Chujie Bu, 2025. "Repositioning coal power to accelerate net-zero transition of China’s power system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Hao Li & Pengru Fan & Yukun Wang & Yang Lu & Feng Chen & Haotian Zhang & Bin Zhang & Bo Wang & Zhaohua Wang, 2024. "Integrated assessment models for resource–environment–economy coordinated development," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:ibrief:ib-24-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.