IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rff/dpaper/dp-25-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Policy Opportunities for Achieving Maryland’s Clean Energy Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Burtraw, Dallas

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Palmer, Karen

    (Resources for the Future)

  • Roy, Nicholas

    (Resources for the Future)

Abstract

This paper examines three frameworks to achieve 100 percent clean energy for electricity consumption in Maryland with full compliance by 2040. Increasing the stringency of the existing Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) is insufficient to achieve this goal. A higher alternative compliance payment is essential for boosting policy-driven clean energy development.A Clean Energy Standard (CES), similar to the RPS, but credits all nonemitting generation and includes an increasing alternative compliance payment, achieves greater investment in clean energy. This standard might be met with imported clean energy or imported clean energy credits, both of which enable continued fossil generation in Maryland, potentially for export.The third framework, an Emissions Intensity Standard (EIS), would cover Maryland’s generated and imported power, focusing on the emissions intensity of consumption. This approach provides incentives for a greater set of compliance opportunities, including substitution away from coal in imported power, and improving the cost effectiveness of emissions reductions. The EIS yields lower electricity prices, negligibly above business as usual through 2035, and modestly higher thereafter.We identify several essential elements of policy design. Compliance could be achieved by placing an obligation upon retail suppliers to achieve clean energy goals. Enforcement would require a resource planning process. Suppliers might demonstrate compliance through power purchase agreements and potentially through joint compliance planning. A regulatory process involving oversight by the Public Service Commission could aim to balance the imperatives to maintain affordability and electricity resource adequacy with clean energy goals. The regulatory process might involve planning, procurement obligations (e.g., power purchase agreements), and ongoing compliance evaluation.Increasing demand for clean energy by large private loads such as data centers could lead to future increases in the price of clean energy, hence early commitments to contracts for clean energy could help limit exposure to such price increases.These policy designs retain Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland’s (PJM’s) role of assuring resource adequacy in the broader region including Maryland, while accelerating the transition toward clean energy consumption within the state. The reliability of electricity supply in Maryland is not necessarily tied to locating generation in Maryland, however, locating a greater amount of generation in the state may provide greater local resilience and give Maryland more options in future energy planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Burtraw, Dallas & Palmer, Karen & Roy, Nicholas, 2025. "Policy Opportunities for Achieving Maryland’s Clean Energy Goals," RFF Working Paper Series 25-09, Resources for the Future.
  • Handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-25-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rff.org/documents/4796/WP_25-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dallas Burtraw & Charles Holt & Karen Palmer & William Shobe, 2022. "Price-Responsive Allowance Supply in Emissions Markets," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(5), pages 851-884.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Christian A. Vossler & Timothy N. Cason & James J. Murphy & Paul J. Ferraro & Todd L. Cherry & George Loewenstein & Peter Martinsson & Jason F. Shogren & Leaf van Boven & Daan van Soest, 2024. "The impact of experiments on environmental policy and natural resource management," Working Papers 2024-05, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
    3. Woerman, Matt, 2023. "Linking carbon markets with different initial conditions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Estelle Cantillon & Aurélie Slechten, 2024. "Market Design for the Environment," NBER Chapters, in: New Directions in Market Design, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Lebeau, Alexis & Petitet, Marie & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2024. "Long-term issues with the Energy-Only Market design in the context of deep decarbonization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Dolphin, Geoffroy & Pahle, Michael & Burtraw, Dallas & Kosch, Mirjam, 2022. "A Net-Zero Target Compels a Backwards Induction Approach to Climate Policy," RFF Working Paper Series 22-18, Resources for the Future.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-25-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Resources for the Future (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.