IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed007/371.html

Counterfeiting as Private Money in Mechanism Design

Author

Listed:
  • Ed Nosal

    (Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland)

  • Ricardo Cavalcanti

    (Getulio Vargas Foundation)

Abstract

We find that in order to have circulating counterfeit notes as part of the optimal mechanism, there must be heterogeneity of opportunities to create and circulate counterfeit among agents. When such heterogeneity exists, we find that counterfeiting creates distortions at both the intensive and extensive margins. That is, output will tend to "low" and the supply of money will tend to be "high," compared to an environment where counterfeiting is not possible. When there is no heterogeneity in opportunities to create and circulate counterfeit notes, then, like in Nosal and Wallace (2005), although the threat of counterfeiting has negative implications for welfare, the optimal mechanism will not allow counterfeit notes to circulate.

Suggested Citation

  • Ed Nosal & Ricardo Cavalcanti, 2007. "Counterfeiting as Private Money in Mechanism Design," 2007 Meeting Papers 371, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    • Handle: RePEc:red:sed007:371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charles M Kahn & Francisco Rivadeneyra & Tsz-Nga Wong, . "Should the central bank issue e-money?," Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures, Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures.
    2. Li, Yiting & Wang, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "A search-theoretic model of double-spending fraud," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Benjamin Lester & Andrew Postlewaite & Randall Wright, 2008. "Information, Liquidity and Asset Prices," PIER Working Paper Archive 08-039, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    4. Guillaume Rocheteau & Pierre‐Olivier Weill, 2011. "Liquidity in Frictional Asset Markets," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(s2), pages 261-282, October.
    5. Cyril Monnet, 2011. "Discussion of “Counterfeiting as Private Money in Mechanism Design”," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(s2), pages 637-643, October.
    6. Shao, Enchuan, 2014. "The threat of counterfeiting in competitive search equilibrium," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 168-185.
    7. Seon Tae Kim & Alessandro Marchesiani, 2024. "Market intelligence gathering, asymmetric information, and the instability of money demand," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(3), pages 1216-1245, July.
    8. Seon Tae Kim & Alessandro Marchesiani, 2020. "Market Intelligence Gathering and Money Demand," Working Papers 202004, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    9. Zachary Bethune & Tai-Wei Hu & Guillaume Rocheteau, 2018. "Optimal Credit Cycles," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 27, pages 231-245, January.
    10. Araujo, Luis & Minetti, Raoul & Murro, Pierluigi, 2021. "Relationship finance, informed liquidity, and monetary policy," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Roberds, William & Schreft, Stacey L., 2009. "Data breaches and identity theft," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 918-929, October.
    12. Ricardo de O. Cavalcanti, 2010. "Inside-money theory after Diamond and Dybvig," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 96(1Q), pages 59-82.
    13. Kang, Kee-Youn, 2017. "Counterfeiting, screening and government policy," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 26-54.
    14. Li, Yiting & Wang, Chien-Chiang, 2019. "Cryptocurrency, Imperfect Information, and Fraud," MPRA Paper 94309, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Shao, Enchuan & Fung, Ben S.C., 2016. "Counterfeit quality and verification in a monetary exchange," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 52(PA), pages 13-25.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:red:sed007:371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Zimmermann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.