IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/77017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Creación de Comunidades (CoP) y Redes de Práctica docentes (NoPs) para mejorar el aprendizaje activo en el contexto universitario
[Creation of teaching Communities (CoP) and Networks of Practice (NoP) for enhancing active learning in the University context]

Author

Listed:
  • Gil-Izquierdo, María
  • Fernández-Pinedo, Nadia
  • Pérez-Encinas, Adriana

Abstract

Resumen: En este trabajo se propone un modelo global que permita impulsar la implementación de Comunidades de Práctica (CoPs) y Redes de Práctica (NoPs) como instrumentos para mejorar el aprendizaje activo en las universidades. Se trata de diseñar un modelo en que los profesores puedan agruparse en redes locales de docentes (CoPs), insertas éstas a su vez en redes nacionales o internacionales, en las que la figura de expertos en diferentes metodologías activas resulta crucial. Todo ello, con el objetivo de superar los problemas y limitaciones derivados de la aplicación aislada y no uniforme de metodologías activas que, en términos generales, realizan los docentes de las universidades españolas. Los beneficios de crear y consolidar estas estructuras son múltiples, tanto para profesores, estudiantes, como para la propia institución. Ello ha de repercutir de forma indudable en una mejor formación del capital humano y social, al combinar conocimiento, el dominio de este conocimiento y la práctica compartida. En una universidad de calidad es esencial la capacidad de dar respuestas rápidas, eficaces y profesionales a las necesidades de los docentes a la hora de aplicar nuevas metodologías docentes y estas redes pueden convertirse en la respuesta a esta demanda. En este sentido, la acción colectiva tanto a nivel local como extra-local puede estar promovida por las instituciones, quienes además deben incentivar la movilidad presencial o virtual de los docentes y, sobre todo, promover la interacción entre docentes con el fin de mejorar de forma eficiente su propio aprendizaje activo en términos de metodologías activas. This paper proposes a global model to enhance the implementation of Communities of Practice (CoPs) and Networks of Practice (NoPs) as tools to improve active learning at universities on the principles of trust and sharing practice. We aim to design a model where academics can be grouped in local networks of teachers (CoPs), inserted in national or even international frames, where the presence of experts in active learning methodologies turns out to be decisive. The main goal of this scheme is to overcome some issues and limitations derived from the isolated and non-uniform application and use of active learning methodologies existing in the Spanish University context. The benefits of creating and consolidating the network approach to promote active learning with different levels are numerous, not only for academics and students but also for the institutions themselves, as it combines knowledge, shared domain and practice and an opportunity to organizational changes and intangible outcomes. In fact, we believe that enhancing teaching performance will benefit an evolving social learning model, a better training of human capital and therefore generating social capital. In a high-quality university context, the capability of providing a quick, effective and professional answer to academics’ needs on the use of active methodologies becomes a key factor. Institutional support should enable the collective action at the local and extra-local level. Besides, it can stimulate the face-to-face or virtual teacher’s mobility, and above all, to promote the interaction between academics with the final aim of improving their own active learning of active methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gil-Izquierdo, María & Fernández-Pinedo, Nadia & Pérez-Encinas, Adriana, 2017. "Creación de Comunidades (CoP) y Redes de Práctica docentes (NoPs) para mejorar el aprendizaje activo en el contexto universitario [Creation of teaching Communities (CoP) and Networks of Practice (N," MPRA Paper 77017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:77017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77017/1/MPRA_paper_77017.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noémie Le Donné & Pablo Fraser & Guillaume Bousquet, 2016. "Teaching Strategies for Instructional Quality: Insights from the TALIS-PISA Link Data," OECD Education Working Papers 148, OECD Publishing.
    2. Probst, Gilbert & Borzillo, Stefano, 2008. "Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 335-347, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Patrick Llerena, 2008. "A case study of a creative start-up: governance, communities and knowledge management," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 125-146.
    2. Cristina Páez-Avilés & Esteve Juanola-Feliu & Islam Bogachan-Tahirbegi & Mónica Mir & Manel González-Piñero & Josep Samitier, 2015. "Innovation And Technology Transfer Of Medical Devices Fostered By Cross-Disciplinary Communities Of Practitioners," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Gyewan Moon & Suk Bong Choi & Shaikh Javed Fardin, 2016. "Organisational factors for effective knowledge sharing: an empirical study of Korean learning teams," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 102-120.
    4. Rogo, Francesco & Cricelli, Livio & Grimaldi, Michele, 2014. "Assessing the performance of open innovation practices: A case study of a community of innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 60-80.
    5. Li Huiyin, 2019. "From Periphery to the Core: Promoting College English Teachers’ Professional Development From the Perspective of Community of Practice," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-74, September.
    6. Gil-Izquierdo, María & Cordero, José Manuel, 2017. "Guidelines for data fusion with international large scale assessments: Insights from the TALIS-PISA link," MPRA Paper 79781, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Natalia Pardo & Mónica Lucía Espinosa & Catalina González-Arango & Miguel Angel Cabrera & Susana Salazar & Sonia Archila & Nancy Palacios & Diana Prieto & Ricardo Camacho & Leonardo Parra-Agudelo, 2021. "Worlding resilience in the Doña Juana Volcano-Páramo, Northern Andes (Colombia): A transdisciplinary view," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(2), pages 1845-1880, June.
    8. Louise Shaw & Dana Jazayeri & Debra Kiegaldie & Meg E. Morris, 2022. "Implementation of Virtual Communities of Practice in Healthcare to Improve Capability and Capacity: A 10-Year Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Janette Bobis & James Russo & Ann Downton & Maggie Feng & Sharyn Livy & Melody McCormick & Peter Sullivan, 2021. "Instructional Moves that Increase Chances of Engaging All Students in Learning Mathematics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Virginie Jacquier-Roux & Hiroatsu Nohara & Claude Paraponaris, 2020. "La régulation dynamique des dispositifs et des situations de gestion des connaissances au cœur de l’innovation des firmes multinationales," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 23(N° spécia), pages 57-87, may.
    11. Albizu Gallastegi, Eneka & Otero Gutiérrez, Beatriz & Olazaran Rodríguez, Mikel, 2013. "Jardueran oinarritutako komunitateak enpresa txiki eta ertainetan," Revista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas, Universidad del País Vasco - Escuela Universitaria de Estudios Empresariales de San Sebastián.
    12. Stéphanie Dameron & Emmanuel Josserand, 2009. "Le piège identitaire:identification sociale et stratégie d'acteurs dans une communauté de pratiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 12(1), pages 127-154, March.
    13. Karen Minyard & Tina A. Smith & Richard Turner & Bobby Milstein & Lori Solomon, 2018. "Community and programmatic factors influencing effective use of system dynamic models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 154-171, January.
    14. Cordero, Jose M. & Gil-Izquierdo, María, 2018. "The effect of teaching strategies on student achievement: An analysis using TALIS-PISA-link," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1313-1331.
    15. Beth Siegel, 2016. "Best practices in the design and implementation of learning communities," Community Development Working Paper 2016-1, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    16. Suchul Lee & Jong-yi Hong, 2019. "Analyzing the change in knowledge sharing efficiency of knowledge networks: a case study," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 41-53, March.
    17. Egan, Cate A. & Webster, Collin & Weaver, R. Glenn & Brian, Ali & Stodden, David & Russ, Laura & Nesbitt, Danielle & Vazou, Spyridoula, 2018. "Partnerships for Active Children in Elementary Schools (PACES): First year process evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 61-69.
    18. Harvey, Jean-François & Cohendet, Patrick & Simon, Laurent & Dubois, Louis-Etienne, 2013. "Another cog in the machine: Designing communities of practice in professional bureaucracies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 27-40.
    19. Viviana Gutiérrez Rincón & Manoj Chandra Bayon & Jose Javier Aguilar Zambrano & Javier Medina Vasquez, 2022. "Exploring the Configuration of Institutional Practices—A Case Study of Innovation Implementation in Healthcare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Wen-Bing Gau, 2022. "Forming a Learning Environment Within a Senior-Citizen Community of Practice," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Comunidades de Práctica; Redes de Práctica; Educación superior; Metodologías Activas.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:77017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.