IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/129162.html

REDRUM: Robust Estimation and Design for the Random Utility Model

Author

Listed:
  • Conte, Anna
  • Hey, John D.

Abstract

Non-monotonicity of utility differences in CRRA-based Random Utility Models has been taken to suggest possible distortions in the estimation of risk preferences. We show that this concern is real only under restrictive assumptions on the stochastic component of the model. Under common scaling, changes in utility differences are absorbed by the precision parameter when this is estimated jointly with risk aversion, so that the likelihood in the risk aversion parameter is invariant. We then show that when different subsets of tasks are represented at different effective scales, distortions may arise if a common error scale is imposed, whereas allowing for parsimonious heteroskedasticity restores stable estimation. Simulations based on standard lottery tasks illustrate these results and clarify that the empirical relevance of non-monotonicity depends not on scaling per se, but on how the stochastic component is specified.

Suggested Citation

  • Conte, Anna & Hey, John D., 2026. "REDRUM: Robust Estimation and Design for the Random Utility Model," MPRA Paper 129162, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:129162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/129162/1/MPRA_paper_129162.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:129162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.