IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/127315.html

Balancing Compliance and Transparency: A Comparative Analysis of Takaful and Conventional Insurance in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Iqbal, Hafiz Masood Ahmad
  • Ali, Amjad
  • Audi, Marc

Abstract

This research undertakes a comparative analysis of governance practices, transparency, ethical compliance, and consumer protection in both conventional insurance and Islamic insurance (Takaful) within the context of Pakistan from 2016 to 2022 both theoretical frameworks and empirical data for comparative evaluation. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study evaluates 20 insurance companies, comprising 10 conventional insurers and 10 Takaful operators by analyzing dimensions such as board governance, disclosure transparency, consumer protection mechanisms, and ethical investment practices, through qualitative thematic analysis and quantitative disclosure scoring. The findings indicate that Takaful firms demonstrate stronger performance in governance (e.g., board independence), Shariah compliance (e.g., investment screening), and ethical consumer practices (e.g., dispute resolution and product disclosure), whereas conventional insurers excel in financial transparency, particularly in areas such as profit reporting and financial statement standardization. Despite these strengths, ethical disclosure remains limited within conventional insurance models, while Takaful operators face challenges related to inconsistent surplus distribution reporting. The study recommends policy-level reforms, organizational strategies, and further academic inquiry to promote ethical and inclusive insurance practices in Pakistan. It also underscores the need for standardized regulatory frameworks and enhanced stakeholder stewardship to ensure a balanced and accountable insurance sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Iqbal, Hafiz Masood Ahmad & Ali, Amjad & Audi, Marc, 2025. "Balancing Compliance and Transparency: A Comparative Analysis of Takaful and Conventional Insurance in Pakistan," MPRA Paper 127315, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:127315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/127315/1/MPRA_paper_127315.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • P4 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems
    • P5 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:127315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.