IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/uwess.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

MOOCs and Crowdsourcing: Massive Courses and Massive Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Prpić, John

Abstract

Premised upon the observation that MOOC and crowdsourcing phenomena share several important characteristics, including IT mediation, large-scale human participation, and varying levels of openness to participants, this work systematizes a comparison of MOOC and crowdsourcing phenomena along these salient dimensions. In doing so, we learn that both domains share further common traits, including similarities in IT structures, knowledge generating capabilities, presence of intermediary service providers, and techniques designed to attract and maintain participant activity. Stemming directly from this analysis, we discuss new directions for future research in both fields and draw out actionable implications for practitioners and researchers in both domains. First Monday, Volume 20, Issue 12, December 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Prpić, John, 2017. "MOOCs and Crowdsourcing: Massive Courses and Massive Resources," SocArXiv uwess, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:uwess
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/uwess
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/589d719a9ad5a101f8cb69c0/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/uwess?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youngjin Yoo & Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Ann Majchrzak, 2012. "Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1398-1408, October.
    2. Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Hyndman, Rob J., 2014. "A gradient boosting approach to the Kaggle load forecasting competition," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 382-394.
    3. Mónica López-Sieben & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Jaime Alonso Gómez, 2014. "Lessons Learned Through Massive Open Online Courses," Springer Books, in: Marta Peris-Ortiz & Fernando J. Garrigós-Simón & Ignacio Gil Pechuán (ed.), Innovation and Teaching Technologies, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 11-21, Springer.
    4. Yuxiang Zhao & Qinghua Zhu, 2014. "Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 417-434, July.
    5. Triparna de Vreede & Cuong Nguyen & Gert-Jan de Vreede & Imed Boughzala & Onook Oh & Roni Reiter-Palmon, 2013. "A theoretical model of user engagement in crowdsourcing," Post-Print hal-01244682, HAL.
    6. Kietzmann, Jan H. & Hermkens, Kristopher & McCarthy, Ian P. & Silvestre, Bruno S., 2011. "Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 241-251, May.
    7. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Adolfo Plasencia & Natalia Navas, 2014. "MOOCs, the Flipped Classroom, and Khan Academy Practices: The Implications of Augmented Learning," Springer Books, in: Marta Peris-Ortiz & Fernando J. Garrigós-Simón & Ignacio Gil Pechuán (ed.), Innovation and Teaching Technologies, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 1-10, Springer.
    9. Prpić, John & Shukla, Prashant P. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2015. "How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 77-85.
    10. Kathleen Scalise, 2011. "Crowdsourcing and Education with Relation to the Knowledge Economy," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 6(3), pages 1-13, July.
    11. Badariah Solemon & Izyana Ariffin & Marina Md Din & Rina Md Anwar, 2013. "A Review of the Uses of Crowdsourcing in Higher Education," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(9), pages 2066-2073, September.
    12. Triparna de Vreede & Cuong Nguyen & Gert-Jan de Vreede & Imed Boughzala & Onook Oh & Roni Reiter-Palmon, 2013. "A theoretical model of user engagement in crowdsourcing," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01244682, HAL.
    13. Badariah Solemon & Izyana Ariffin & Marina Md Din & Rina Md Anwar, 2013. "A Review of the Uses of Crowdsourcing in Higher Education," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(9), pages 2066-2073.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prpić, John, 2017. "A Framework for Policy Crowdsourcing," SocArXiv pmfdx, Center for Open Science.
    2. Prpić, John, 2017. "The Fundamentals of Policy Crowdsourcing," SocArXiv wdtvh, Center for Open Science.
    3. Täuscher, Karl, 2017. "Leveraging collective intelligence: How to design and manage crowd-based business models," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 237-245.
    4. Prpić, John, 2017. "Experiments on Crowdsourcing Policy Assessment," SocArXiv qznpk, Center for Open Science.
    5. Nguyen Hoang Thuan & Pedro Antunes & David Johnstone, 2016. "Factors influencing the decision to crowdsource: A systematic literature review," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 47-68, February.
    6. Tuo Gladys & Yi Feng & Wang Wenxin & Sarpong Solomon, 2020. "The Second Round Resource Acquisition of Entrepreneurial Crowdfunded Ventures: The Relevance of Campaign and Project Implementation Performance Outcomes," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Baccarella, Christian V. & Wagner, Timm F. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2018. "Social media? It's serious! Understanding the dark side of social media," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 431-438.
    8. Lee, Jung & Seo, DongBack, 2016. "Crowdsourcing not all sourced by the crowd: An observation on the behavior of Wikipedia participants," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 55, pages 14-21.
    9. Bal, Anjali S. & Weidner, Kelly & Hanna, Richard & Mills, Adam J., 2017. "Crowdsourcing and brand control," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 219-228.
    10. Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 0. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    11. Regina Lenart-Gansiniec, 2017. "Factors Influencing Decisions about Crowdsourcing in the Public Sector: A Literature Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(6), pages 1997-2005.
    12. Araz Taeihagh, 2017. "Crowdsourcing: a new tool for policy-making?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 629-647, December.
    13. Victor Cabral & Willem Winden, 2022. "The reaction of coworking spaces to the COVID-19 pandemic. A dynamic capabilities perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(2), pages 257-281, June.
    14. Wilson, Matthew & Robson, Karen & Botha, Elsamari, 2017. "Crowdsourcing in a time of empowered stakeholders: Lessons from crowdsourcing campaigns," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 247-253.
    15. Brown, Terrence E., 2017. "Sensor-based entrepreneurship: A framework for developing new products and services," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 819-830.
    16. Jordi Paniagua & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Pawel Korzynski, 2020. "Talent Goes Social: Online Corporate Networking and Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Prpić, John & Shukla, Prashant P. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2015. "How to work a crowd: Developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 77-85.
    18. Julia Troll & Ivo Blohm & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Why Incorporating a Platform-Intermediary can Increase Crowdsourcees’ Engagement," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 433-450, August.
    19. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Geoffrey Parker & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2017. "Unraveling Platform Strategies: A Review from an Organizational Ambidexterity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Mina Nasiri & Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Tero Rantala & Hannu Rantanen, 2023. "Shaping Digital Innovation Via Digital-related Capabilities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1063-1080, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:uwess. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.