IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/6ayvm_v1.html

Defining Sufficient Accessibility: Integrating Measured and Perceived Transportation Access with Quality-of-Life Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Rahman, Md Hamidur

    (The University of Texas at Austin)

  • Karner, Alex

    (The University of Texas at Austin)

Abstract

Sufficient accessibility means that all individuals have a minimum level of access to essential opportunities such as work, school, healthcare, and leisure, making it possible to meet their basic needs. In this study, we integrate “measured accessibility” and “perceived accessibility” within a quality-of-life (QoL) framework to empirically determine what constitutes “sufficient” accessibility. Using community survey data from Austin, Texas, we combine a composite accessibility index—built from both primal (cumulative opportunity) and dual (minimum cost) measures across auto and transit modes—with self-reported QoL and perceived accessibility. We develop a sufficiency threshold by identifying the level of perceived accessibility associated with median QoL under different levels of measured accessibility. Our results indicate that perceived accessibility is a stronger predictor of QoL than measured access. A sufficiency threshold is derived using a normative regression-based approach, identifying the minimum perceived accessibility score required to reach the median QoL benchmark under typical access conditions. Logistic regression analyses further reveal that women, renters, long-term residents, and full-time workers are significantly less likely to report sufficient perceived accessibility—suggesting that social and structural barriers persist even in areas with good physical access. The study underscores the importance of integrating user- and system-level indicators into transport equity analyses. Policy applications include using sufficiency thresholds to evaluate whether new investments help lift disadvantaged groups out of accessibility poverty and enable more equitable QoL outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahman, Md Hamidur & Karner, Alex, 2025. "Defining Sufficient Accessibility: Integrating Measured and Perceived Transportation Access with Quality-of-Life Outcomes," SocArXiv 6ayvm_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:6ayvm_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6ayvm_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/690503b769db761d39be377a/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/6ayvm_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susanne Nordbakke & Tim Schwanen, 2015. "Transport, unmet activity needs and wellbeing in later life: exploring the links," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1129-1151, November.
    2. Katrin Lättman & Lars E. Olsson & Margareta Friman & Satoshi Fujii, 2019. "Perceived Accessibility, Satisfaction with Daily Travel, and Life Satisfaction among the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deka, Devajyoti & Wang, Chihuangji, 2024. "An investigation into the potential use of information and communication technologies by trip-deprived older adults in New Jersey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Chakrabarti, Sandip & Narsim, Jayanth Kumar, 2026. "Does carlessness degrade older adults’ quality of life? Insights from India and takeaways for transportation equity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Pot, Felix Johan, 2025. "Perceived accessibility and transport equity: Does satisfaction imply perceived sufficiency of opportunities?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Jin, Scarlett T. & Sui, Daniel Z., 2024. "Bikesharing and equity: A nationwide study of bikesharing accessibility in the U.S," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Muhammad Zudhy Irawan & Prawira Fajarindra Belgiawan & Tri Basuki Joewono & Nurvita I. M. Simanjuntak, 2020. "Do motorcycle-based ride-hailing apps threaten bus ridership? A hybrid choice modeling approach with latent variables," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 207-231, March.
    6. Jean Ryan, 2020. "Examining the Process of Modal Choice for Everyday Travel Among Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Blandin, Lola & Vecchio, Giovanni & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio, 2024. "Car dependency in the urban margins: The influence of perceived accessibility on mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Ahmad, Zaheer & Batool, Zahara & Starkey, Paul, 2019. "Understanding mobility characteristics and needs of older persons in urban Pakistan with respect to use of public transport and self-driving," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 181-190.
    9. Low, Wai-Ying & Cao, Mengqiu & De Vos, Jonas & Hickman, Robin, 2020. "The journey experience of visually impaired people on public transport in London," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 137-148.
    10. Giovanni Vecchio & Ignacio Tiznado-Aitken & Bryan Castillo & Stefan Steiniger, 2024. "Fair transport policies for older people: accessibility and affordability of public transport in Santiago, Chile," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 689-715, April.
    11. Chang, Enyu & Zhang, Min & Li, Zhixuan & Hu, Yuchen, 2025. "When digital disadvantage meets transport disadvantage: The association between smartphone-based mobility services and perceived transport disadvantage among the elderly," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    12. Márquez, Luis & Pineda, Laura X. & Poveda, Juan C., 2022. "Mobility-impaired people’s preferences for a specialized paratransit service as BRT’s feeder: The role of autonomy, relatedness, and competence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 172-185.
    13. van der Vlugt, Anna-Lena & Lättman, Katrin & Welsch, Janina & Prichard, Edward & Otsuka, Noriko & De Vos, Jonas, 2025. "Analysing the determinants of perceived walkability, and its effects on walking," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Annesha Enam & Karthik C. Konduri & Naveen Eluru & Srinath Ravulaparthy, 2018. "Relationship between well-being and daily time use of elderly: evidence from the disabilities and use of time survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1783-1810, November.
    15. Devajyoti Deka, 2024. "An In-Depth Look at the Trip-Deprived People of the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Wang, Xize, 2022. "Impact of Health on Driving for America's Older Adults: A Nationwide, Longitudinal Study," SocArXiv h5scf, Center for Open Science.
    17. Sukhov, Alexandre & Friman, Margareta & Olsson, Lars E., 2023. "Unlocking potential: An integrated approach using PLS-SEM, NCA, and fsQCA for informed decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Buehler, Ralph & Pucher, John & Wittwer, Rico & Gerike, Regine, 2024. "Trends and determinants of the mobility of older adults in the USA and Germany, 2001–2017," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Susanne T. Dale Nordbakke, 2019. "Mobility, Out-of-Home Activity Participation and Needs Fulfilment in Later Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    20. He, Sylvia Y. & Thøgersen, John & Cheung, Yannie H.Y. & Yu, Alesia H.Y., 2020. "Ageing in a transit-oriented city: Satisfaction with transport, social inclusion and wellbeing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 85-94.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:6ayvm_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.