IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/4dnrc_v1.html

Road Violence and Perceptions of Safety among Pedestrians and Cyclists

Author

Listed:
  • Pina-Sánchez, Jose

    (University of Leeds)

  • Trinidad, Alexander

    (University of Cologne)

  • Loader, Ian

Abstract

This registered report investigates whether involvement in road traffic collisions meaningfully shapes pedestrians’ and cyclists’ perceptions of safety. Drawing on criminological insights - particularly the fear‑victimisation paradox - the study explores the common policy assumption that reducing collisions alone improves subjective safety. Using ESRA2 survey data from 24 European countries, the analysis estimates both average and conditional treatment effects of collision experience on perceived safety, accounting for vulnerability (age, gender) and exposure (active travel frequency). The study employs equivalence testing and counterfactual modelling to assess whether victims’ perceptions differ from non‑victims’. Findings will clarify whether collision reduction strategies are sufficient to encourage active travel or whether broader interventions addressing vulnerability and environmental cues are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Pina-Sánchez, Jose & Trinidad, Alexander & Loader, Ian, 2026. "Road Violence and Perceptions of Safety among Pedestrians and Cyclists," SocArXiv 4dnrc_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4dnrc_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/4dnrc_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69ea775e9ef5bad825bf78a8/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/4dnrc_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4dnrc_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.