IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/3nhrj_v1.html

An anatomy of digital technology bans

Author

Listed:
  • Keller, Clara Iglesias
  • Appelman, Naomi

Abstract

Calls to ban digital technologies gained traction across liberal democracies, while similar measures in other contexts are portrayed as hallmarks of authoritarian governance. These bans rarely amount to complete prohibitions, appear in various contexts, and serve different political aims. We argue that, before engaging the normative question of legitimacy, regulatory scholarship must clarify what “technology bans” are. We propose a conceptual framework that understands technology bans primarily as regulatory discourse: narratives, justifications, and disputes that shape regulation. Drawing on discourse theory in public policy, we develop a typology of technology bans discourses, identifying three types: geopolitical measures, protection of vulnerable populations, and public interest bans. Our analysis demonstrates that they function as regulatory frames that communicate authority, sovereignty, and democratic control over technological development. By unpacking their discursive structure, the paper contributes to the understanding of technology bans as a regulatory category and to ongoing debates about technology governance and democratic legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Keller, Clara Iglesias & Appelman, Naomi, 2026. "An anatomy of digital technology bans," SocArXiv 3nhrj_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:3nhrj_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3nhrj_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69b2c58902a4a72f5fdc74e0/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/3nhrj_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13212 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bell, Stephen, 2011. "Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 883-906, October.
    3. Eric Brousseau, 2009. "Regulating Networks in the "New Economy": Organising Coopetition to Share Information and Knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00685833, HAL.
    4. Meckling, Jonas & Nahm, Jonas, 2019. "The politics of technology bans: Industrial policy competition and green goals for the auto industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 470-479.
    5. Braithwaite,John & Drahos,Peter, 2000. "Global Business Regulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784993, Enero-Abr.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sasha Quahe, 2018. "EU in crisis: what implications for climate and energy policy?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 169-182, June.
    2. Büthe Tim, 2010. "Engineering Uncontestedness? The Origins and Institutional Development of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 1-64, October.
    3. Zhu, Zhaohui & Tan, Yafei, 2022. "Can green industrial policy promote green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 59-75.
    4. Stirton, Lindsay & Lodge, Martin, 2002. "Embedding regulatory autonomy: the reform of Jamaican telecommunications regulation 1988-2001," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35986, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Nicholas A. Phelps & Andrew Wood, 2018. "Promoting the global economy: The uneven development of the location consulting industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1336-1354, September.
    6. Enea Constanta & Enea Constantin, 2015. "Implementation Status Of Requirements Eu In The Field Of Modern Commerce," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0, pages 374-381, December.
    7. Ruth Mayne & Duncan Green & Irene Guijt & Martin Walsh & Richard English & Paul Cairney, 2018. "Using evidence to influence policy: Oxfam’s experience," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. David Monciardini & Guido Conaldi, 2019. "The European regulation of corporate social responsibility: The role of beneficiaries' intermediaries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 240-259, June.
    9. Tan Celine, 2019. "Beyond the ‘Moments’ of Law and Development: Critical Reflections on Law and Development Scholarship in a Globalized Economy," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 285-321, June.
    10. Frankel, Jeffrey, 2008. "Global Environmental Policy and Global Trade Policy," Working Paper Series rwp08-058, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    11. Daniel Fitzpatrick & Rebecca Monson, 2022. "Property rights and climate migration: Adaptive governance in the South Pacific," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 519-535, April.
    12. Andreas Panagopoulos, 2004. "When Does Patent Protection Stimulate Innovation?," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 04/565, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    13. Shaun Elder, 2014. "Does the GFC as a change agent of financial regulatory models and approaches in Europe provide lessons for Asia?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 419-430, December.
    14. Anna Hutchens, 2011. "Playing games of governance: How and why Fair Trade pioneers evade corporate capture," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 221-240, June.
    15. Stahl, B.C. & Andreou, A. & Brey, P. & Hatzakis, T. & Kirichenko, A. & Macnish, K. & Laulhé Shaelou, S. & Patel, A. & Ryan, M. & Wright, D., 2021. "Artificial intelligence for human flourishing – Beyond principles for machine learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 374-388.
    16. Jocelyn Pixley & Sam Whimster & Shaun Wilson, 2013. "Central bank independence: A social economic and democratic critique," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 24(1), pages 32-50, March.
    17. Terence C. Halliday & Josh Pacewicz & Susan Block‐Lieb, 2013. "Who governs? Delegations and delegates in global trade lawmaking," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 279-298, September.
    18. Linghong Zhang & Wence Shi, 2025. "The Impacts of the US Inflation Reduction Act on EV Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Mennicken, Andrea, 2006. "Translation and standardisation: audit world building in Post-Soviet Russia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 3033, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Smith, Peter C. & Anell, Anders & Busse, Reinhard & Crivelli, Luca & Healy, Judith & Lindahl, Anne Karin & Westert, Gert & Kene, Tobechukwu, 2012. "Leadership and governance in seven developed health systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 37-49.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:3nhrj_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.