IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/2khse.html

Three Conceptions of Spatial Locality in Chicago School Sociology (And Their Significance Today)

Author

Listed:
  • Merriman, Ben

Abstract

The development of new spatial methods has heightened long-standing interest in the local organization of urban life. This growth in empirical research has run ahead of theories about the nature of local space: to a large extent, contemporary sociology employs the same conceptions of space developed in works of the Chicago School produced between 1918 and the early 1930’s. This article describes three major notions of locality developed by the Chicago School, respectively defined by ecology, institutions, and subjective perceptions. These accounts of locality are not theoretically consistent, and make reference to partially distinct empirical phenomena. A brief survey of contemporary neighborhood research reveals the persistence of these spatial accounts, as well as uncertainty about the goals of neighborhood research. Revisiting the accounts of urban place developed by the Chicago School suggests five distinct ends for research on locality: research programs focusing specifically on ecology, institutions, or perceptions; methodological and theoretical pluralism in pursuit of maximally rich description; and empirical integration seeking to describe the role of multiple processes in the production of local space. Citation: Merriman, Ben. 2015. “Three Conceptions of Spatial Locality in Chicago School Sociology (And Their Significance Today)” American Sociologist 46(2):269-287.

Suggested Citation

  • Merriman, Ben, 2017. "Three Conceptions of Spatial Locality in Chicago School Sociology (And Their Significance Today)," SocArXiv 2khse, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:2khse
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2khse
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5a3208fb78cc980010cea210/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/2khse?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean Reardon & Stephen Matthews & David O’Sullivan & Barrett Lee & Glenn Firebaugh & Chad Farrell & Kendra Bischoff, 2008. "The geographic scale of Metropolitan racial segregation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(3), pages 489-514, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandro Sousa & Vincenzo Nicosia, 2022. "Quantifying ethnic segregation in cities through random walks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Diane Coffey & Ashwini Deshpande & Jeffrey Hammer & Dean Spears, 2019. "Local Social Inequality, Economic Inequality, and Disparities in Child Height in India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1427-1452, August.
    3. Sue Easton & Loretta Lees & Phil Hubbard & Nicholas Tate, 2020. "Measuring and mapping displacement: The problem of quantification in the battle against gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 286-306, February.
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0174993 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:osf:socarx:2khse_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lévêque, Christophe & Saleh, Mohamed, 2018. "Does industrialization affect segregation? Evidence from nineteenth-century Cairo," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 40-61.
    7. Tse-Chuan Yang & Stephen A Matthews, 2015. "Death by Segregation: Does the Dimension of Racial Segregation Matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, September.
    8. Tobias Ruttenauer & Kasimir Dederichs & David Kretschmer, 2025. "Immigrant Residential Segregation in Europe: A Comparative Study of Spatial Segregation Patterns in Urban Areas across 30 Countries," Papers 2512.17037, arXiv.org.
    9. John R. Logan & Hyoung-jin Shin, 2016. "Birds of a Feather: Social Bases of Neighborhood Formation in Newark, New Jersey, 1880," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(4), pages 1085-1108, August.
    10. Monkkonen, Paavo & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2014. "Innovative measurement of spatial segregation: Comparative evidence from Hong Kong and San Francisco," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 99-111.
    11. Christopher S Fowler, 2018. "Key assumptions in multiscale segregation measures: How zoning and strength of spatial association condition outcomes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1055-1072, November.
    12. Eva K. Andersson & Bo Malmberg & Rafael Costa & Bart Sleutjes & Marcin Jan Stonawski & Helga A. G. Valk, 2018. "A Comparative Study of Segregation Patterns in Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden: Neighbourhood Concentration and Representation of Non-European Migrants," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(2), pages 251-275, May.
    13. Kristina Lerman & Luciano G. Marin & Megha Arora & Lucas H. Costa Lima & Emilio Ferrara & David Garcia, 2018. "Language, demographics, emotions, and the structure of online social networks," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 209-225, January.
    14. Christopher S. Fowler & Barrett A. Lee & Stephen A. Matthews, 2016. "The Contributions of Places to Metropolitan Ethnoracial Diversity and Segregation: Decomposing Change Across Space and Time," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(6), pages 1955-1977, December.
    15. Christopher D Lloyd & Ian Shuttleworth, 2012. "Residential Segregation in Northern Ireland in 2001: Assessing the Value of Exploring Spatial Variations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(1), pages 52-67, January.
    16. Richard Harris & Ron Johnston, 2018. "Measuring and modelling segregation – New concepts, new methods and new data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 999-1002, November.
    17. Jeffrey Burr & Jan Mutchler & Kerstin Gerst-Emerson, 2013. "Residential Segregation, Nativity Status, and Hispanic Living Arrangements in Later Life," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(1), pages 25-45, February.
    18. Michael Poulsen & Ron Johnston & James Forrest, 2010. "The Intensity of Ethnic Residential Clustering: Exploring Scale Effects Using Local Indicators of Spatial Association," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(4), pages 874-894, April.
    19. Naveen Bharathi & Deepak Malghan & Sumit Mishra & Andaleeb Rahman, 2022. "Residential segregation and public services in urban India," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(14), pages 2912-2932, November.
    20. Umut Türk & John Östh, 2023. "Introducing a spatially explicit Gini measure for spatial segregation," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 469-488, October.
    21. Ron Johnston & Michael Poulsen & James Forrest, 2009. "Using Local Statistics to Portray Ethnic Residential Segregation in London," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 09/213, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    22. Elijah Knaap & Sergio Rey, 2024. "Segregated by design? Street network topological structure and the measurement of urban segregation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1408-1429, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:2khse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.