IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/d83bu.html

Consumer savings, price, and emissions impacts of increasing demand response in the Midcontinent electricity market

Author

Listed:
  • Dahlke, Steven
  • Prorok, Matt

Abstract

This paper estimates consumer savings, CO2 emissions reductions, and price effects from increasing demand response (DR) dispatch in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) electricity market. To quantify market effects, we develop a dynamic supply and demand model to explore a range of DR deployment scenarios. The study is motivated by the existence of regulatory and market rule barriers to market-based deployment of DR resources in the MISO region. We show annual consumer savings from increased market-based DR can vary from $1.3 million to $17.6 million under typical peak operating conditions, depending on the amount of DR resources available for market dispatch and the frequency of deployment. Consumer savings and other market effects increase exponentially during atypical periods with tight supply and high prices. Additionally, we find that DR deployment often reduces CO2 emissions, but the magnitude of emissions reductions varies depending on the emissions content of marginal generation at the time and location of deployment. The results of this study suggest regulators and other stakeholders should focus policy efforts to reducing regulatory barriers to DR deployment in wholesale markets, particularly in locations that experience high price spikes, to improve market efficiency and achieve cost savings for consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dahlke, Steven & Prorok, Matt, 2018. "Consumer savings, price, and emissions impacts of increasing demand response in the Midcontinent electricity market," OSF Preprints d83bu, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:d83bu
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/d83bu
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5c0161bcb7ef14001849cf3f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/d83bu?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Alexander M. & Brown, Marilyn A., 2015. "Demand response: A carbon-neutral resource?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 10-22.
    2. repec:aen:journl:2006v27-04-a06 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:aen:journl:ej35-4-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:aen:journl:2000v21-01-a04 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:aen:journl:ej37-2-chen is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:aen:journl:32-4-a05 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Hung-po Chao & Mario DePillis, 2013. "Incentive effects of paying demand response in wholesale electricity markets," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 265-283, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steve Dahlke & Matt Prorok, 2019. "Consumer Savings, Price, and Emissions Impacts of Increasing Demand Response in the Midcontinent Electricity Market," The Energy Journal, , vol. 40(3), pages 243-262, May.
    2. Brown, Marilyn A. & Li, Yufei & Soni, Anmol, 2020. "Are all jobs created equal? Regional employment impacts of a U.S. carbon tax," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    3. Ren'e Aid & Dylan Possamai & Nizar Touzi, 2018. "Optimal electricity demand response contracting with responsiveness incentives," Papers 1810.09063, arXiv.org, revised May 2019.
    4. Lin, Jin & Dong, Jun & Liu, Dongran & Zhang, Yaoyu & Ma, Tongtao, 2022. "From peak shedding to low-carbon transitions: Customer psychological factors in demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    5. Hyun, Minwoo & Kim, Yeong Jae & Eom, Jiyong, 2020. "Assessing the impact of a demand-resource bidding market on an electricity generation portfolio and the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Iliopoulos, Nikolaos & Esteban, Miguel & Kudo, Shogo, 2020. "Assessing the willingness of residential electricity consumers to adopt demand side management and distributed energy resources: A case study on the Japanese market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Alexander Vaninsky, 2018. "Optimal environment-friendly economic restructuring: the United States–China cooperation case study," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 189-220, August.
    8. Yukihide Kurakawa & Makoto Tanaka, 2023. "Impacts of market power in the day-ahead electricity market on incentive-based demand response," RIEEM Discussion Paper Series 2303, Research Institute for Environmental Economics and Management, Waseda University.
    9. Bastida, Leire & Cohen, Jed J. & Kollmann, Andrea & Moya, Ana & Reichl, Johannes, 2019. "Exploring the role of ICT on household behavioural energy efficiency to mitigate global warming," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 455-462.
    10. Goulden, Murray & Spence, Alexa & Wardman, Jamie & Leygue, Caroline, 2018. "Differentiating ‘the user’ in DSR: Developing demand side response in advanced economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 176-185.
    11. Neves, Diana & Pina, André & Silva, Carlos A., 2018. "Assessment of the potential use of demand response in DHW systems on isolated microgrids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 989-998.
    12. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Takuro Tanaka & Eri Nakamura, 2015. "The Effect of Demand Response on Electricity Consumption in Japan," Discussion Papers 2015-02, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    13. Parrish, Bryony & Heptonstall, Phil & Gross, Rob & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2020. "A systematic review of motivations, enablers and barriers for consumer engagement with residential demand response," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Wang, Guotao & Lin, Zhenjia & Chen, Yuntian & Qiu, Rui & Zhang, Haoran & Yan, Jinyue, 2025. "Carbon-billed future for virtual power plants: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Yukihide Kurakawa & Makoto Tanaka, 2025. "Impact of Demand-side Energy Efficiency on the Electricity Balancing Market and Environmental Policy," RIEEM Discussion Paper Series 2501, Research Institute for Environmental Economics and Management, Waseda University.
    16. Guo, Peiyang & Li, Victor O.K. & Lam, Jacqueline C.K., 2017. "Smart demand response in China: Challenges and drivers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-10.
    17. Nikolaos Iliopoulos & Motoharu Onuki & Miguel Esteban, 2021. "Shedding Light on the Factors That Influence Residential Demand Response in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    18. James I. Stewart, 2020. "Utility Customer Supply of Demand Response Capacity," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(4), pages 129-152, July.
    19. Winzer, Christian & Ramírez-Molina, Héctor & Hirth, Lion & Schlecht, Ingmar, 2024. "Profile contracts for electricity retail customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Xu Chen & Andrew N. Kleit, 2016. "Money for Nothing? Why FERC Order 745 Should have Died," The Energy Journal, , vol. 37(2), pages 201-222, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:d83bu. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.