IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/cvq78.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The far-right and anti-vaccine attitudes: lessons from Spain’s mass COVID-19 vaccine roll-out

Author

Listed:
  • Serrano-Alarcon, Manuel
  • Mckee, Martin
  • wang, Yuxi
  • Kentikelenis, Alexander
  • Stuckler, David

Abstract

Far-right politicians in several countries have been vocal opponents of COVID-19 vaccination. But does this matter? We take advantage of repeated cross-sectional surveys with samples of around 3,800 individuals across Spain conducted monthly from December 2020 to January 2022 (n = 51,294) to examine any association between far-right politics and vaccine hesitancy. Consistent with prior data, we found that far-right supporters were almost twice as likely to be vaccine-hesitant than the overall population in December 2020, before vaccines became available. However, with a successful vaccine roll out, this difference shrank, reaching non-significance by September 2021. From October 2021, however, vaccine hesitancy rebounded among this group at a time when the leadership of the far-right promoted a “freedom of choice” discourse common among anti-vax supporters. By the latest month analyzed (January 2022) far-right voters had returned to being twice as likely to be vaccine-hesitant and 7 percentage points less likely to be vaccinated than the general population. Our results are consistent with evidence that far-right politicians can encourage vaccine hesitancy. Nonetheless, we show that public attitudes towards vaccination are not immutable. Whereas a rapid and effective vaccine rollout can help to overcome the resistance of far-right voters to get vaccinated, they also seem to be susceptible to their party leader's discourse on vaccines.

Suggested Citation

  • Serrano-Alarcon, Manuel & Mckee, Martin & wang, Yuxi & Kentikelenis, Alexander & Stuckler, David, 2022. "The far-right and anti-vaccine attitudes: lessons from Spain’s mass COVID-19 vaccine roll-out," OSF Preprints cvq78, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cvq78
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cvq78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/625ebc0e138e6d00250fbfe0/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/cvq78?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agranov, Marina & Elliott, Matt & Ortoleva, Pietro, 2021. "The importance of Social Norms against Strategic Effects: The case of Covid-19 vaccine uptake," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fanny Velardo & Verity Watson & Pierre Arwidson & François Alla & Stéphane Luchini & Michaël Schwarzinger, 2021. "Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population," Post-Print hal-03513452, HAL.
    2. Kumar, Viney & Bhattacharyya, Samit, 2023. "Nonlinear effect of sentiments and opinion sharing on vaccination decision in face of an outbreak: A multiplex network approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    3. Paolo Buonanno & Sergio Galletta & Marcello Puca, 2023. "The role of civic capital on vaccination," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 993-999, May.
    4. Silvia Angerer & Daniela Glätzle-Rützler & Philipp Lergetporer & Thomas Rittmannsberger, 2022. "Beliefs about social norms and (the polarization of) COVID-19 vaccination readiness," Working Papers 2022-20, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    5. Daziano, Ricardo & Budziński, Wiktor, 2023. "Evolution of preferences for COVID-19 vaccine throughout the pandemic – The choice experiment approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    6. Nadav Rakocz & Sindhu Ernala & Israel Nir & Udi Weinsberg & Amit Bahl, 2023. "The heterogeneous effects of social support on the adoption of Facebook’s vaccine profile frames feature," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Moran Bodas & Bruria Adini & Eli Jaffe & Arielle Kaim & Kobi Peleg, 2022. "Lockdown Efficacy in Controlling the Spread of COVID-19 May Be Waning Due to Decline in Public Compliance, Especially among Unvaccinated Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study in Israel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    8. Silvia Angerer & Daniela Glätzle-Rützler & Philipp Lergetporer & Thomas Rittmannsberger, 2023. "Beliefs about social norms and (the polarization of) COVID-19 vaccination readiness," Munich Papers in Political Economy 26, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    9. Michele Battisti & Ilpo Kauppinen & Britta Rude, 2022. "Twitter and Crime: The Effect of Social Movements on GenderBased Violence," ifo Working Paper Series 381, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    10. Nail Kashaev & Natalia Lazzati & Ruli Xiao, 2023. "Peer Effects in Consideration and Preferences," Papers 2310.12272, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    11. Silvia Angerer & Daniela Glätzle-Rützler & Philipp Lergetporer & Thomas Rittmannsberger, 2022. "Beliefs about Social Norms and (the Polarization of) Covid-19 Vaccination Readiness," CESifo Working Paper Series 10196, CESifo.
    12. Fangfei Wang & Sifan Zhang & Lei Lei, 2022. "Appealing to Individual Fears or Social Norms: How Can the Public Be Persuaded to Accept COVID-19 Vaccination through Risk Communication?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Sheena Moosa & Raheema Abdul Raheem & Aminath Riyaz & Hawwa Shiuna Musthafa & Aishath Zeen Naeem, 2022. "The role of social value orientation in modulating vaccine uptake in the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cvq78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.