IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/2kgny.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Responsible Research(er) Recruitment Checklist: A best practice guide for applying principles of responsible research assessment in researcher recruitment materials

Author

Listed:
  • Henderson, Emma Louise

    (University of Surrey)

  • Darby, Robert
  • Farran, Emily Kate

Abstract

Assessment of potential academic staff members is necessary for making recruitment decisions. Amidst growing concern over the use of inappropriate quantitative indicators for research and researcher evaluation, institutions have begun to reform their policies to emphasise broader, responsible researcher assessment. To help implement such reforms, here we share a best practice Responsible Research(er) Recruitment Checklist for engaging with the principles of responsible research assessment in the writing of recruitment materials such as job adverts for research and academic roles. Aligned with the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) principles, the checklist provides guidance on how to emphasise the primacy of research content and researcher contributions to published articles, without reliance on journal-based metrics. The checklist also recommends that evaluations consider a broad range of research outputs, and that collaboration, citizenship, author contributions, and Open Research practices be recognised. At the time of writing, the checklist is being piloted.

Suggested Citation

  • Henderson, Emma Louise & Darby, Robert & Farran, Emily Kate, 2023. "The Responsible Research(er) Recruitment Checklist: A best practice guide for applying principles of responsible research assessment in researcher recruitment materials," OSF Preprints 2kgny, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2kgny
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2kgny
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/655c9c58062a3e39fdedfec2/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/2kgny?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noémie Aubert Bonn & Wim Pinxten, 2021. "Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers’ opinions on success indicators," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2kgny. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.