IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/lawarc/9uftm_v1.html

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Modern History of Human Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Duan, Fengyu

Abstract

Beginning with the phrase “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights,” the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) proclaims its purpose of establishing global human rights from the outset. As a common standard of achievement for all signatory nations, the UDHR constitutes an essential cornerstone in the modern history of human rights by drawing upon ancient to contemporary philosophies, responses to the heinous crimes of World War II, and various visions for future human rights standards. Despite diverging viewpoints from many of the drafting parties and states, the UDHR eventually transcended conflict to form the underpinnings of a moral compass for all of humankind. This essay first explores how the UDHR came into formation by reviewing the historical origins of human rights, global dynamics prior to the UDHR, the drafting process and key debates involved, and finally its achieved compromise and ultimate unanimous adoption. Then, the essay examines ways in which the UDHR has evolved, from both a legal and moral angle, since its adoption in the context of past achievements and current challenges. From a historical point of view, I argue that the UDHR is a living document that has and is expected to change as our societies continue to evolve.

Suggested Citation

  • Duan, Fengyu, 2017. "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Modern History of Human Rights," LawArchive 9uftm_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:9uftm_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9uftm_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5a01f0ff594d900265668214/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/9uftm_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger N. Baldwin, 1946. "International Agreements Can Protect Specific Rights," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 243(1), pages 134-138, January.
    2. Ann Mayer, 2009. "Human Rights as a Dimension of CSR: The Blurred Lines Between Legal and Non-Legal Categories," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(4), pages 561-577, October.
    3. Hendrix, Cullen S. & Wong, Wendy H., 2013. "When Is the Pen Truly Mighty? Regime Type and the Efficacy of Naming and Shaming in Curbing Human Rights Abuses," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 651-672, July.
    4. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, 2007. "Seeping in slowly: how human rights concerns are penetrating the WTO," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 413-449, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duan, Fengyu, 2017. "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Modern History of Human Rights," LawRxiv 9uftm, Center for Open Science.
    2. Guillaume Gaulier & Aude Sztulman & Deniz Ünal, 2020. "Are global value chains receding? The jury is still out. Key findings from the analysis of deflated world trade in parts and components," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 161, pages 219-236.
    3. Sam R. Bell & K. Chad Clay & Amanda Murdie, 2019. "Join the Chorus, Avoid the Spotlight: The Effect of Neighborhood and Social Dynamics on Human Rights Organization Shaming," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(1), pages 167-193, January.
    4. Corwin, Hillary, 2023. "Coercive and catalytic strategies for human rights promotion: State violence and foreign assistance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Shiwei Fan & Lan Xue & Jianhua Xu, 2018. "What Drives Policy Attention to Climate Change in China? An Empirical Analysis through the Lens of People’s Daily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2016. "Beyond trade: the impact of WTO transparency norms on socialist-oriented countries with an emphasis on Vietnam's legal reform," OSF Preprints bgzhv, Center for Open Science.
    7. Jordan Becker & Sarah E Kreps & Paul Poast & Rochelle Terman, 2024. "Transatlantic Shakedown: Presidential Shaming and NATO Burden Sharing," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 68(2-3), pages 195-229, March.
    8. Heloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 753-769, July.
    9. Simone Dietrich & Amanda Murdie, 2017. "Human rights shaming through INGOs and foreign aid delivery," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 95-120, March.
    10. Philippe Stoesslé & Valeria Alejandra Patiño Díaz & Yetzi Rosales Martínez, 2020. "Transnational Advocacy Networks of Migrants and Asylum Seekers’ Human Rights: The San Diego—Tijuana Border in the Trump Era," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Susan Ariel Aaronson & M. Rodwan Abouharb, 2011. "Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up?," Working Papers 2011-13, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    12. Benjamin T Jones & Eleonora Mattiacci, 2023. "How foreign information campaigns shape US public pronouncements about civil wars," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(5), pages 839-852, September.
    13. Cullen Hendrix & Wendy Wong, 2014. "Knowing your audience: How the structure of international relations and organizational choices affect amnesty international’s advocacy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 29-58, March.
    14. Robert Brathwaite & Shanshan Lian & Amanda Murdie & Baekkwan Park, 2025. "Tailoring the message: A new dataset on the dyadic nature of NGO shaming in the media," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 1304-1316, July.
    15. Rochelle Terman & Erik Voeten, 2018. "The relational politics of shame: Evidence from the universal periodic review," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Gray, Rob & Gray, Sue, 2011. "Accountability and human rights: A tentative exploration and a commentary," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 781-789.
    17. Wakako Maekawa, 2023. "External intelligence assistance and the recipient government’s violence against civilians," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(5), pages 511-532, September.
    18. Sam R. Bell & Victoria Banks, 2018. "Women's Rights Organizations and Human Trafficking," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(1), pages 362-376, March.
    19. Kelly Morrison, 2024. "Named and Shamed: International Advocacy and Public Support for Repressive Leaders," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 68(2-3), pages 294-321, March.
    20. Daniel Berliner, 2016. "Transnational advocacy and domestic law: International NGOs and the design of freedom of information laws," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 121-144, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:9uftm_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.