IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/edarxi/942et_v1.html

Fiscal Nonrecognition of Student Time: Measuring Compulsory Student Hours in U.S. Public K–12 Education

Author

Listed:
  • Hyatt, Kyle

Abstract

Public K–12 systems legally require children to attend a large number of instructional hours each year, but official budgets recognize only the cost of adult labor. This creates an accounting puzzle: is there any fiscal object that explicitly values student time? We propose a framework to quantify this fiscal nonrecognition. We define Compulsory Student Hours (CSH) as the total mandated student time, where CSH = Σᵢ EᵢHᵢwᵢ, Eᵢ is enrollment in group i, Hᵢ is required hours per year for group i, and wᵢ is a compulsion weight. We impute a dollar value, Imputed Student Time Value (ISTV), by multiplying CSH by an hourly benchmark V. We identify any actual Recognized Student-Time Dollars (RSD), defined as direct payments to students for required attendance, and compute the Student Time Recognition Rate (STRR), where STRR = RSD/ISTV. Using national data of approximately 49.2 million public K–12 students, roughly 1,000 statutory hours per year, and a conservative federal minimum-wage benchmark of $7.25 per hour, the resulting ISTV is on the order of $3.57 × 10¹¹. In ordinary public finance there are effectively no direct student-time payments, yielding STRR ≈ 0. These are order-of-magnitude illustrations: if H = 1,080 or V = $15, ISTV rises, but RSD remains approximately zero. The results highlight a stark asymmetry: schools’ budgets explicitly account for teacher and staff time, but institutionally required student time has virtually no direct fiscal counterpart. This is a descriptive accounting exercise, not a claim that students are owed wages or a policy proposal. The contribution is a neutral, replicable method for measuring the gap between adult labor accounting and student-time accounting in K–12 finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyatt, Kyle, 2026. "Fiscal Nonrecognition of Student Time: Measuring Compulsory Student Hours in U.S. Public K–12 Education," EdArXiv 942et_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:edarxi:942et_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/942et_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a257da92514efd40ac59e22/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/942et_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Steven Landefeld & Barbara M. Fraumeni & Cindy M. Vojtech, 2009. "Accounting For Household Production: A Prototype Satellite Account Using The American Time Use Survey," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 55(2), pages 205-225, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bridgman, Benjamin & Duernecker, Georg & Herrendorf, Berthold, 2018. "Structural transformation, marketization, and household production around the world," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 102-126.
    2. Gretchen Donehower, 2018. "Measuring the Gendered Economy," Working Papers cwwwp4, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    3. Benjamin Bridgman & Andrew Craig & Danit Kanal, 2022. "Accounting for Household Production in the National Accounts," Survey of Current Business, Bureau of Economic Analysis, vol. 102(2), pages 1-3, February.
    4. Duernecker, Georg & Herrendorf, Berthold, 2018. "On the allocation of time – A quantitative analysis of the roles of taxes and productivities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 169-187.
    5. Rachel Soloveichik, 2019. "Accounting for Improved Brick and Mortar Shopping Experiences," BEA Working Papers 0165, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    6. A. Srija & Shirke Shrinivas Vijay, 2020. "Female Labour Force Participation in India: Insights Through Time Use Survey," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 12(3), pages 159-199, December.
    7. Hideyuki Kamiryo, 2014. "Earth Endogenous System: To Answer the Current Unsolved Economic Problems (Second Edition)," Earth Endogenous System: To Answer the Current Unsolved Economic Problems (Second Edition), Better Advances Press, Canada, edition 2, volume 2, number 01 edited by Dr. Yisheng Huang.
    8. Andrea Brandolini & Eliana Viviano, 2016. "Accounting for total work in labour statistics [Der Gesamtbetrag der Arbeit in den Arbeitsmarktstatistiken]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 49(3), pages 199-212, November.
    9. Daniel Sichel & Eric von Hippel, 2021. "Household Innovation and R&D: Bigger than You Think," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(3), pages 639-658, September.
    10. Carla Canelas & François Gardes & Philip Merrigan & Silvia Salazar, 2019. "Are time and money equally substitutable for all commodity groups in the household’s domestic production?," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 267-285, March.
    11. Jooyeoun Suh & Nancy Folbre, 2016. "Valuing Unpaid Child Care in the U.S.: A Prototype Satellite Account Using the American Time Use Survey," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62(4), pages 668-684, December.
    12. J. Steven Landefeld & Shaunda M. Villones, 2009. "GDP and Beyond: Measuring Economic Progress and Sustainability," BEA Papers 0096, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    13. Martin, Jean-Christophe & Mongruel, Rémi & Levrel, Harold, 2018. "Integrating Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Ecosystem Satellite Account: A Case Study in the Gulf of Saint-Malo (France)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 141-152.
    14. Georg Duernecker & Berthold Herrendorf, 2015. "On the Allocation of Time - A Quantitative Analysis of the U.S. and France," CESifo Working Paper Series 5475, CESifo.
    15. Joyce P. Jacobsen, 2011. "A Key Global Challenge: Reducing Losses due to Gender Inequality," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2011-006, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
    16. Nancy Folbre & James Heintz, 2017. "Investment, consumption, or public good? Unpaid work and intra-family transfers in the macro-economy," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 91(01), pages 100-121.
    17. Fernandes, Alexandra, 2025. "The non-observed economy in the national accounts: New evidence for EU and EFTA Member States," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 137-164.
    18. Andrea Brandolini & Eliana Viviano, 2014. "Accounting for total work," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 253, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    19. repec:bap:eebook:02 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Bridgman, Benjamin, 2016. "Home productivity," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 60-76.
    21. Alessio Moro & Solmaz Moslehi & Satoshi Tanaka, 2017. "Does Home Production Drive Structural Transformation?," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 116-146, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:edarxi:942et_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.