IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaaa/1-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards Better Measurement of Government

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

This Working Paper compiles a set of recent comparable OECD data on revenues, inputs, and public sector processes and proposes a way forward in data collection. It is the first of three annual Working Papers as the Public Governance and Territorial Development (GOV) Directorate of the OECD builds up to the first publication of a major biennial publication, “Government at a Glance”, in late 2009. It is accompanied by a volume entitled “Measuring Government Activities” (OECD, forthcoming) that sets out the proposed approach and that poses technical alternatives for expert review and comment. The first part of this volume provides a comprehensive exposition of the proposed data classification and analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2007. "Towards Better Measurement of Government," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 1, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaaa:1-en
    DOI: 10.1787/301575636734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/301575636734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/301575636734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boyer, Pierre C., 2015. "Inequality-averse principal, exogenous budget, and second-best public-goods provision," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 61-63.
    2. Dang, Yuxuan & Zhao, Zhenting & Kong, Xiangbin & Lei, Ming & Liao, Yubo & Xie, Zhen & Song, Wei, 2023. "Discerning the process of cultivated land governance transition in China since the reform and opening-up-- Based on the multiple streams framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Habib Zafarullah & Jannatul Ferdous, 2021. "Cyberspace at the Grassroots: E-Governance and Citizen/Stakeholder Perceptions at the Local Level in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 6(2), pages 168-187, July.
    4. Habib Zafarullah & Noore Alam Siddiquee, 2021. "Open government and the right to information: Implications for transparency and accountability in Asia," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 157-168, October.
    5. Dwyer, Rocky, 2009. "Effectiveness Measurement: When Will We Get It Right?," Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Universidad ESAN, vol. 14(27), pages 63-71.
    6. Natalia Aversano & Francesca Manes Rossi & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, 2017. "I sistemi di misurazione della performance nelle universit?: considerazioni critiche sul sistema italiano," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 15-36.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaaa:1-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.