IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/devaaa/325-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Well-being and Progress in Countries at Different Stages of Development: Towards a More Universal Conceptual Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Romina Boarini

    (OECD)

  • Alexandre Kolev

    (OECD)

  • Allister McGregor

    (University of Sussex)

Abstract

A wide range of voices around the world have stressed the need to understand development as a multidimensional phenomenon that involves and affects many aspects of people’s lives. Increasingly, it is recognised that current well-being and its long-term sustainability are the ultimate goals of development and that these notions better capture the human experience of development. The objectives of this paper are to explain why well-being matters in countries at different levels of development and to address measurement challenges in the context of developing countries. These objectives are pursued in four main steps. First, the paper offers a conception of well-being and illustrates its relevance in different development contexts. Second, it describes briefly how the measurement of well-being is implemented under the OECD Better Life Initiative for OECD countries. Third, it proposes ways in which the OECD framework can be adapted to specific development contexts and thereby made more universal, by suggesting relevant well-being dimensions and indicators that could be used to measure well-being in developing countries. Finally, it discusses the possible implications of the adapted framework for OECD work in developing countries, in particular its possible use in the Multi-Dimensional Country Reviews conducted by the OECD Development Centre for a range of non OECD countries. Deuxièmement, il passe brièvement en revue la manière dont la mesure du bien-être est effectuée dans le cadre de l’Initiative de l’OCDE pour une vie meilleure au sein des pays de l’OCDE. Troisièmement, il propose des pistes pour adapter le cadre de l’OCDE à des contextes de développement spécifiques, le rendant de fait plus universel, en présentant des dimensions du bien-être et des indicateurs qui pourraient être utilisés pour mesurer le bien-être dans les pays en voie de développement. Finalement, ce document discute les implications possibles du cadre ajusté pour le travail de l’OCDE dans les pays en développement, en particulier son utilisation dans les Revues pays multidimensionnelles réalisées par le Centre de développement de l’OCDE dans les pays non OCDE.

Suggested Citation

  • Romina Boarini & Alexandre Kolev & Allister McGregor, 2014. "Measuring Well-being and Progress in Countries at Different Stages of Development: Towards a More Universal Conceptual Framework," OECD Development Centre Working Papers 325, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:devaaa:325-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jxss4hv2d8n-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxss4hv2d8n-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jxss4hv2d8n-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Delhey, Jan & Steckermeier, Leonie C., 2016. "The Good Life, Affluence, and Self-reported Happiness: Introducing the Good Life Index and Debunking Two Popular Myths," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 50-66.
    2. Ulpiano Ruiz-Rivas & Jorge Martínez-Crespo & Mónica Chinchilla-Sánchez, 2024. "Assessment of Energy Poverty and Alleviation Strategies in the Global South," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Griffiths, Victoria F. & Bull, Joseph W. & Baker, Julia & Infield, Mark & Roe, Dilys & Nalwanga, Dianah & Byaruhanga, Achilles & Milner-Gulland, E.J., 2020. "Incorporating local nature-based cultural values into biodiversity No Net Loss strategies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Kangmennaang, Joseph & Elliott, Susan J., 2018. "Towards an integrated framework for understanding the links between inequalities and wellbeing of places in low and middle income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 45-53.
    5. Christophe Béné, 2020. "Resilience of local food systems and links to food security – A review of some important concepts in the context of COVID-19 and other shocks," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(4), pages 805-822, August.
    6. L'Roe, Jessica & Detoeuf, Diane & Wieland, Michelle & Ikati, Bernard & Enduyi Kimuha, Moïse & Sandrin, François & Angauko Sukari, Odette & Nzale Nkumu, Junior & Kretser, Heidi E. & Wilkie, David, 2023. "Large-scale monitoring in the DRC’s Ituri forest with a locally informed multidimensional well-being index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Shiri Cohen Kaminitz, 2020. "Looking Good or Feeling Well? Understanding the Combinations of Well-Being Indicators Using Insights from the Philosophy of Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Matteo Mazziotta & Adriano Pareto, 2019. "Use and Misuse of PCA for Measuring Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 451-476, April.
    9. Sergio Tezanos Vázquez & Andy Sumner, 2016. "Is the ‘Developing World’ Changing? A Dynamic and Multidimensional Taxonomy of Developing Countries," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(5), pages 847-874, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bien-être; development; développement; well-being;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:devaaa:325-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dcoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.