IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ctpaaa/38-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corporate Effective Tax Rates: Model Description and Results from 36 OECD and Non-OECD Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Tibor Hanappi

Abstract

Variations in the definition of the corporate tax base across countries can have significant impacts on tax liabilities associated with a given investment. An accurate assessment of the effects of corporate tax systems on investment thus needs to build on a consistent methodological framework covering not only statutory tax rates (STRs) but also many provisions affecting the base such as, e.g., fiscal depreciation. The new OECD model described in this paper provides such a framework; building on the theoretical model developed by Devereux and Griffith (1999, 2003) it presents forward-looking effective tax rates (ETRs) for 36 OECD and Selected Partner Economies taking into account a wide range of corporate tax provisions. Empirical results confirm that corporate tax bases vary considerably across countries and asset categories; since tax bases are typically narrower in countries with higher STRs, ETRs tend to be less dispersed across countries than STRs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tibor Hanappi, 2018. "Corporate Effective Tax Rates: Model Description and Results from 36 OECD and Non-OECD Countries," OECD Taxation Working Papers 38, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:ctpaaa:38-en
    DOI: 10.1787/a07f9958-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/a07f9958-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/a07f9958-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Goodridge & Jonathan Haskel, 2023. "Accounting for the slowdown in UK innovation and productivity," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(359), pages 780-812, July.
    2. Ramón E. López & Pablo Gutiérrez Cubillos & Eugenio Figueroa, 2020. "The Tax Paradox and Weak Tax Neutrality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(3), pages 1150-1169, January.
    3. Thomas von Brasch & Ivan Frankovic & Eero Tölö, 2021. "Corporate taxes, investment and the self-financing rate. The effect of location decisions and exports," Discussion Papers 955, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    4. Sean Mc Auliffe & Georg U. Thunecke & Georg Wamser, 2023. "The Tax-Elasticity of Tangible Fixed Assets: Evidence from Novel Corporate Tax Data," CESifo Working Paper Series 10628, CESifo.
    5. Toshiyuki Uemura, 2023. "Corporate Tax Increases and Shareholder-Level Capital Income Tax Neutrality in Japan -An Analysis of Fundamental Reforms Using Effective Tax Rates-," Discussion Paper Series 257, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.
    6. Irina Dezhina & Tamam Nafikova & Timur Gareev & Alexey Ponomarev, 2020. "Tax Incentives for Supporting Competitiveness of Telecommunication Manufacturers," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 51-62.
    7. Miyazawa, Kazutoshi & Ogawa, Hikaru & Tamai, Toshiki, 2019. "Capital market integration and fiscal sustainability," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Tibor Hanappi & Ana Cinta González Cabral, 2022. "The impact of the international tax reforms under Pillar One and Pillar Two on MNE’s investment costs," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(6), pages 1495-1526, December.
    9. Kate Hynes & Yongzheng Liu & Jie Ma & Ian Wooton, 2022. "Tax competition for FDI: China’s exceptional approach," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(3), pages 788-809, June.
    10. Seppo Kari & Londiwe Khoza & Nangamso Manjezi & Kyle McNabb, 2019. "Combatting debt bias in South African firms: The case for an allowance for corporate equity," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-10, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Pascal Saint-Amans & Clemens Fuest & Joachim Englisch & Deborah Schanz & Andreas Oestreicher & Nadine Riedel & Pola Schneemelcher & Wolfgang Schön & Luzius Cavelti & Christian Jaag, 2020. "The OECD Proposals for Reforming Corporate Tax – A Plan with Undesirable Side Effects?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(03), pages 03-32, March.
    12. Poschke, Markus, 2019. "Wage Employment, Unemployment and Self-Employment across Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 12367, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Javier Garcia-Bernardo & Petr Janský & Thomas Tørsløv, 2022. "Decomposing Multinational Corporations’ Declining Effective Tax Rates," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 70(2), pages 338-381, June.
    14. Sergei G. Belev & Evgenii O. Matveev & Nikita S. Moguchev, 2022. "Estimation of Profit Taxation Effect on Russian Companies’ Investments," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 8(2), pages 127-139.
    15. Uemura, Toshiyuki, 2022. "Evaluating Japan's corporate income tax reform using firm-specific effective tax rates," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Francesca Gastaldi & EugenioPalmieri & Maria Grazia Pazienza & Fiorenza Venturini, 2021. "Mitigare i divari regionali negli investimenti: un?analisi del credito di imposta per il Mezzogiorno," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(1-2), pages 38-63.
    17. Natalia E. Barbashova, 2022. "Approaches to the Modeling and Use of a Long-term Budget Projection at the Regional Level," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 2, pages 8-25, April.
    18. Toshiyuki Uemura, 2021. "Evaluating Japan's Corporate Income Tax Reform using Firm-specific Effective Tax Rates," Discussion Paper Series 226, School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate tax base; corporate taxation; investment decisions; tax competition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H32 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Firm

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ctpaaa:38-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ctoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.