IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/34235.html

Is Managed Care Effective in Long-term Care Settings? Evidence from Medicare Institutional Special Needs Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Momotazur Rahman
  • Brian McGarry
  • Elizabeth M. White
  • David C. Grabowski
  • Cyrus M. Kosar

Abstract

Nursing homes face unique financial incentives that encourage under-investment in onsite clinical capabilities and overreliance on hospitals to triage and care for residents with dementia, contributing to high levels of health care spending for this population. A proposed solution to align incentives are Institutional Special Needs Plans (I-SNPs), which combine capitated financing with plan-provided onsite clinician presence. Using 12 million resident-quarters of data from 2016-2022, we exploit the timing of nursing homes’ I-SNP contracting to instrument for plan enrollment and estimate causal effects on hospitalization and other health outcomes. We found that I-SNP enrollment reduced quarterly hospitalization rates by 3 to 4 percentage points, which equates to one third of hospitalizations relative to the sample mean. We do not find consistent evidence of an impact on other health outcomes and quality of care indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Momotazur Rahman & Brian McGarry & Elizabeth M. White & David C. Grabowski & Cyrus M. Kosar, 2025. "Is Managed Care Effective in Long-term Care Settings? Evidence from Medicare Institutional Special Needs Plans," NBER Working Papers 34235, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34235
    Note: AG
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w34235.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Duggan & Jonathan Gruber & Boris Vabson, 2018. "The Consequences of Health Care Privatization: Evidence from Medicare Advantage Exits," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 153-186, February.
    2. Michael Geruso & Timothy Layton, 2020. "Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(3), pages 984-1026.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vilsa Curto & Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Jonathan Levin & Jay Bhattacharya, 2019. "Health Care Spending and Utilization in Public and Private Medicare," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 302-332, April.
    2. Moiz Bhai & Danny R. Hughes, 2026. "Estimating Self‐Selection in Medicare Advantage," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(2), March.
    3. Colleen Carey, 2017. "Technological Change and Risk Adjustment: Benefit Design Incentives in Medicare Part D," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 9(1), pages 38-73, February.
    4. Hanming Fang & Qing Gong, 2017. "Detecting Potential Overbilling in Medicare Reimbursement via Hours Worked," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(2), pages 562-591, February.
    5. Timothy J. Layton & Randall P. Ellis & Thomas G. McGuire, 2015. "Assessing Incentives for Adverse Selection in Health Plan Payment Systems," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series wp2015-024, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    6. Benjamin Handel & Nianyi Hong & Lynn M. Hua & Yuki Ito, 2023. "Employer risk‐adjustment transitions with inertial consumers: Evidence from CalPERS," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(1), pages 93-121, March.
    7. Kurt Lavetti & Kosali Simon, 2018. "Strategic Formulary Design in Medicare Part D Plans," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 154-192, August.
    8. Cook, Amanda & Averett, Susan, 2020. "Do hospitals respond to changing incentive structures? Evidence from Medicare’s 2007 DRG restructuring," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    9. Josefa Henriquez & Marica Iommi & Thomas McGuire & Emmanouil Mentzakis & Francesco Paolucci, 2023. "Designing feasible and effective health plan payments in countries with data availability constraints," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(1), pages 33-57, March.
    10. Michael Geruso & Timothy J. Layton & Grace McCormack & Mark Shepard, 2023. "The Two-Margin Problem in Insurance Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(2), pages 237-257, March.
    11. Decarolis, Francesco & Guglielmo, Andrea, 2017. "Insurers’ response to selection risk: Evidence from Medicare enrollment reforms," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 383-396.
    12. Benjamin R. Handel & Jonathan T. Kolstad, 2021. "The Affordable Care Act After a Decade: Industrial Organization of the Insurance Exchanges," NBER Working Papers 29178, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Nicholas Benson & Jose Joaquin Lopez, 2024. "Surgeons' response to reimbursement changes for alternative procedures: Evidence from spine fusion in the U.S," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(1), pages 41-55, January.
    14. Lai, Yi & Fu, Hongqiao & Li, Ling & Yip, Winnie, 2022. "Hospital response to a case-based payment scheme under regional global budget: The case of Guangzhou in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    15. Politzer, Eran, 2025. "A change of plans: Switching costs in the procurement of health insurance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    16. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/4bg68glinb8r8roh0akvprtu9u is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Lee, Ajin, 2020. "How do hospitals respond to managed care? Evidence from at-risk newborns," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Elizabeth L. Munnich & Michael R. Richards, 2020. "Treatment flows after outsourcing public insurance provision: Evidence from Florida Medicaid," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(11), pages 1343-1363, November.
    19. Jeffrey Clemens & Jonathan M. Leganza & Alex Masucci, 2026. "Plugging gaps in payment systems: Evidence from the take‐up of new Medicare billing codes," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 44(1), pages 105-130, January.
    20. Michael Geruso & Timothy J. Layton, 2017. "Selection in Health Insurance Markets and Its Policy Remedies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(4), pages 23-50, Fall.
    21. Joseph P. Newhouse & Mary Beth Landrum & Mary Price & J. Michael McWilliams & John Hsu & Thomas G. McGuire, 2019. "The Comparative Advantage of Medicare Advantage," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(2), pages 281-301, Spring.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.