IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/32655.html

Career Values and Labor Market Shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Petrova
  • Gregor Schubert
  • Bledi Taska
  • Pinar Yildirim

Abstract

Career progression is important for people’s lives and economic decisions. We develop an empirical measure of an occupation’s local “career value”—the long-run value of the anticipated earnings from working in that job and following the career ladder associated with it. We document that career values have stagnated during the 2000-2016 period, despite growing wages, due to deterioration in job-related upward mobility. Declines in career values are associated with reduced housing construction and college attainment and higher Republican vote shares in 2016, consistent with career values shaping forward-looking household decisions. We then illustrate how the measure can be used to study labor market shocks. First, we provide an in-depth case study of exposure to industrial robots to demonstrate the value of the career-value framework for decomposing labor market shocks into wage and career-ladder channels, tracing heterogeneity and worker-level transitions, and highlighting the role of worker mobility. We find that one additional robot per 1,000 workers lowered local career values by about 1.3%, with about three-fifths of the decline operating through wages and just over a third through the deterioration of career paths. Robotization exposure reduced transitions to better-paid occupations and redirected workers toward similarly- or lower-paid jobs, particularly in high-manufacturing regions. Second, we apply the same decomposition comparatively to the Chinese import competition trade shock and to local house-price declines during the Great Recession. The comparison reveals distinct channel and timing profiles across shocks that wage or employment measures alone do not reveal.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Petrova & Gregor Schubert & Bledi Taska & Pinar Yildirim, 2024. "Career Values and Labor Market Shocks," NBER Working Papers 32655, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32655
    Note: IO POL PR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w32655.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Petrova & Gregor Schubert & Bledi Taska & Pinar Yildirim, 2025. "Robotization and the Political Response of Politicians," NBER Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Artificial Intelligence, pages 139-151, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
    • M0 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General
    • M29 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Other
    • M55 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Contracting Devices
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.