IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/32651.html

Industrial Policy in the Global Semiconductor Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Pinelopi K. Goldberg
  • Réka Juhász
  • Nathan J. Lane
  • Giulia Lo Forte
  • Jeff Thurk

Abstract

The resurgence of subsidies and industrial policies has raised concerns about their potential inefficiency and alignment with multilateral principles. Critics warn that such policies may divert resources to less efficient firms and provoke retaliatory measures from other countries, leading to a wasteful “subsidy race.” However, subsidies for sectors with inherent cross-border externalities can have positive global effects. This paper examines these issues within the semiconductor industry: a key driver of economic growth and innovation with potentially significant learning-by-doing and strategic importance due to its dual-use applications. Our study aims to: (1) document and quantify recent industrial policies in the global semiconductor sector, (2) explore the rationale behind these policies, and (3) evaluate their economic impacts, particularly their cross-border effects, and compatibility with multilateral principles. We employ historical analysis, natural language processing, and a model-based approach to measure government support and its impacts. Our findings indicate that government support has been vital for the industry’s growth, with subsidies being the primary form of support. They also highlight the importance of cross-border technology transfers through FDI, business and research collaborations, and technology licensing. China, despite significant subsidies, does not stand out as an outlier compared to other countries, given its market size. Model estimates suggest the presence of learning-by-doing at the firm-product level as well as economies of scope within a firm and substantial cross-border learning spillovers. These spillovers likely reflect cross-country technology transfers and the role of fabless clients and input suppliers in disseminating knowledge globally through their interactions with foundries. Such cross-border spillovers are not merely accidental but result from deliberate actions by market participants that cannot be taken for granted. Firms may choose to share knowledge across borders or restrict access to frontier technology, thereby excluding certain countries. Future research will use model estimates to simulate the quantitative implications of subsidies and to explore the dynamics of a “subsidy race” in the semiconductor industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Pinelopi K. Goldberg & Réka Juhász & Nathan J. Lane & Giulia Lo Forte & Jeff Thurk, 2024. "Industrial Policy in the Global Semiconductor Sector," NBER Working Papers 32651, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32651
    Note: DAE IO ITI PR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w32651.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanming Fang & Ming Li & Guangli Lu, 2025. "Decoding China’s Industrial Policies," PIER Working Paper Archive 25-012, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    2. Fiona Paine & Richard R. Townsend & Ting Xu, 2025. "Should Governments Restrict Foreign Investments in Startups?," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 5, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Kee, Hiau Looi & Taglioni, Daria & Xie, Enze, 2025. "Green Product Exports, Domestic Value Added and Trade Policies : Firm-Level Evidence from China," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11240, The World Bank.
    4. Zhang, Yinze & Ruan, Jianqing & Zhang, Yuwei, 2025. "Industrial policies and development of grain clusters: Evidence from China's policy in major grain-producing areas," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Tomaso Duso & Martin Peitz, 2025. "Aligning Competition Policy and Industrial Policy in the EU," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2145, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Bilge Erten & Joseph E. Stiglitz & Eric Verhoogen, 2025. "Employment Impacts of the CHIPS Act," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 25166, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F61 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Microeconomic Impacts
    • L63 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Microelectronics; Computers; Communications Equipment
    • N60 - Economic History - - Manufacturing and Construction - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.