IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Impact of China-EU Trade on Climate Change

Listed author(s):
  • Yunfeng Yan
  • Laike Yang
  • Jan Priewe
Registered author(s):

    International trade has a significant impact on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and global climate change. In this respect, trade between China and the European Union, as the world’s two biggest exporters, is critical to the global GHG emission reduction efforts. The EU-15 is committed to reducing its CO2 emissions under the Kyoto Protocol. However, if the EU reaches its pledged targets by importing CO2 intensive products from China, thereby effectively outsourcing its own emissions to an extent of ca 13.6% of EU’s total energy-related CO2 emissions (2006/7); this hollows out and counters the spirit of the EU’s reduction commitment. The paper analyzes CO2 emissions embodied in China-EU trade from 1995-2006. CO2 emissions embodied in China’s exports to the EU and in the EU’s exports to China were highly imbalanced. The CO2 emissions embodied in China’s exports to the EU were 95.04 Mt in 1995 and 532.35 Mt in 2006, accounting for 2.99% and 8.85 % of China’s CO2 emissions respectively. On the other hand, those of the EU’s exports to China were only 5.78 Mt in 1995 and 26.05Mt in 2006, accounting for only 0.17% and 0.73% of the EU’s emissions respectively. The paper also shows that the scale effect caused the increase of emissions embodied in China’s exports to the EU, while the technology effect and the composition effect offset some of the increases. In terms of sectoral composition, the exports from China to the EU in “fabricated metal products, machinery and equipment†, “basic metals and other non-metallic mineral products†, “rubber, plastics products, and other manufacturing†and “chemicals and chemical products†accounted for a substantial proportion of China’s trade-embodied emissions. The paper concludes that the present trend is unsustainable and leads to ever-increasing trade distortions with environmentally counter-productive incentives. Policy responses are needed, first and foremost a continual carbon footprint accounting system between the EU and China. Finally three policy options to gradually lower imbalances and distortions are outlined.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Hochschule fuer Technik und Wirtschaft, Berlin in its series Competence Centre on Money, Trade, Finance and Development with number 1102.

    in new window

    Length: 17 pages
    Date of creation: Jun 2011
    Publication status: Published in Berlin Working Papers on Money, Finance, Trade and Development, June 2011
    Handle: RePEc:mtf:wpaper:1102
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Grossman, G.M & Krueger, A.B., 1991. "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement," Papers 158, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
    2. Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 1998. "Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 307-324.
    3. Weber, Christopher L. & Peters, Glen P. & Guan, Dabo & Hubacek, Klaus, 2008. "The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 3572-3577, September.
    4. Shui, Bin & Harriss, Robert C., 2006. "The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 4063-4068, December.
    5. Werner Antweiler & Brian R. Copeland & M. Scott Taylor, 2001. "Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 877-908, September.
    6. Satoshi Nakano & Asako Okamura & Norihisa Sakurai & Masayuki Suzuki & Yoshiaki Tojo & Norihiko Yamano, 2009. "The Measurement of CO2 Embodiments in International Trade: Evidence from the Harmonised Input-Output and Bilateral Trade Database," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2009/3, OECD Publishing.
    7. Nadim Ahmad & Andrew Wyckoff, 2003. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade of Goods," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2003/15, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mtf:wpaper:1102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Prof. Dr. Sebastian Dullien)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.