IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Can the Economics of Shared Societies Support More Resilient Economies and Global Sustainability? Challenges and opportunities in an interdependent world

  • Daniel Hyslop
Registered author(s):

    This paper first highlights the empirical relationship between negative peace and key indicators of the shared societies agenda, such as measures of social cohesion, civic activism, human rights and in equality of opportunity in economic, social and political spheres. This shows how negative peace or the absence of violence is both the product and producer of the formal and informal institutions that are associated with the shared societies agenda. The body of the working paper is an attempt to categorize and account for the size of economic activity devoted to either inflicting, preventing, and dealing with the consequences of violence in the United States. This defined category of economic activity is referred to as the violence containment industry (VCI) or violence containment spending. It is defined as ‘public or private sector economic activity that either inflicts or prevents, responds to, and deals with the consequences of violence’. The costs of violence containment spending is broken down into both the public and private sectors, and shown in terms of net value added. The research shows in 2010 alone, the violence containment industry accounted for USD2.16 trillion or around 15% of U.S. gross domestic product. This shows if violence containment spending was represented as a discrete national economic entity, it would, excluding the U.S. itself, be the sixth largest economy in the world. In individual terms, it represents an equivalent dollar value of over USD7000 for every man, women, and child each year or just over USD15000 for each taxpayer. This shows the interdependent relationship between peace, shared societies, and economic productivity.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://web2.msm.nl/RePEc/msm/wpaper/MSM-WP2012-31.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Maastricht School of Management in its series Working Papers with number 2012/31.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 34 pages
    Date of creation: Mar 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:msm:wpaper:2012/31
    Contact details of provider: Postal: P.O. Box 1203, 6201 BE Maastricht
    Phone: +31 43 387 08 08
    Fax: +31 43 387 08 00
    Web page: http://research.msm.nl
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Michael A. Valenti & Olivier G. Giovannoni, 2013. "The Economics of Inclusion: Building an Argument for a Shared Society," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_755, Levy Economics Institute.
    2. Carlos Bozzoli & Tilman Bruck & Simon Sottsas, 2010. "A Survey Of The Global Economic Costs Of Conflict," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 165-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:msm:wpaper:2012/31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maud de By)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.