IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpg/wpaper/2008_48.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Fine-grained Analysis of the Jumping to Conclusions Bias in Schizophrenia: Data-Gathering, Response Confidence, and Information Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Glöckner

    (Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn)

  • Steffen Moritz

    (University Hospital, Hamburg-Eppendorf)

Abstract

Impaired decision behavior of schizophrenia patients has been repeatedly observed. We investigated the aspects of the jumping to conclusions bias (JTC): biases in information-gathering, information weighting and integration, and overconfidence, using the process tracing paradigm Mouselab, which allows for an in-depth exploration of various decision-making processes in a structured information environment. Although showing less focused and systematic information search, patients practically considered all pieces of information and showed no JTC in the sense of collecting less pieces of evidence. Choices of patients and controls both approximated a rational solution quite well, but patients showed more extreme and, in view of the ambiguous nature of the task, unjustified confidence. Both groups mainly used weighted additive decision strategies for information integration and only a small proportion relied on simple heuristics. Under high stress, induced by high affective valence plus time pressure, however, schizophrenia patients showed a less appropriate weighting of information and switched to equal weighting strategies. Patients that scored higher on the schizophrenia scale PANSS showed less information search and tended to rely more often on simple heuristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Glöckner & Steffen Moritz, 2008. "A Fine-grained Analysis of the Jumping to Conclusions Bias in Schizophrenia: Data-Gathering, Response Confidence, and Information Integration," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_48, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2008_48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2008_48online.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Newell, Ben R. & Weston, Nicola J. & Shanks, David R., 2003. "Empirical tests of a fast-and-frugal heuristic: Not everyone "takes-the-best"," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 82-96, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:7:p:587-600 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Daniel Hausmann & Damian Läge, 2008. "Sequential evidence accumulation in decision making: The individual desired level of confidence can explain the extent of information acquisition," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 3, pages 229-243, March.
    3. Rieger, Marc Oliver & Wang, Mei & Hausmann, Daniel, 2021. "Pre-decisional information acquisition: Why do we pay too much for information? Brief report," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Glöckner, Andreas & Betsch, Tilmann, 2008. "Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the priority heuristic against cumulative prospect theory," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 75-95, September.
    5. Manel Baucells & Juan A. Carrasco & Robin M. Hogarth, 2008. "Cumulative Dominance and Heuristic Performance in Binary Multiattribute Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1289-1304, October.
    6. Arndt Bröder & Ben Newell, 2008. "Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 3, pages 205-214, March.
    7. Jean-François Laslier, 2009. "The Leader Rule," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 21(1), pages 113-136, January.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:299-329 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Robin Hogarth & Natalia Karelaia, 2003. "Take-the-best and other simple strategies: Why and when they work 'well' in binary choice," Economics Working Papers 709, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    10. Karelaia, Natalia, 2006. "Thirst for confirmation in multi-attribute choice: Does search for consistency impair decision performance?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 128-143, May.
    11. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:205-214 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Andreas Gloeckner & Steffen Moritz, 2009. "A fine-grained analysis of the jumping-to-conclusions bias in schizophrenia: Data-gathering, response confidence, and information integration}," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(7), pages 587-600, December.
    13. Sipos, Norbert & Lukovszki, Lívia & Rideg, András & Vörös, Zsófia, 2023. "A vállalkozói döntéshozatali logikák kognitív megközelítése [Entrepreneurial effectuation through the lens of cognitive processes]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 544-563.
    14. Jörg Rieskamp, 2008. "The importance of learning when making inferences," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 3, pages 261-277, March.
    15. Juliane E. Kaemmer & Wolfgang Gaissmaier & Uwe Czienskowski, 2013. "The environment matters: Comparing individuals and dyads in their adaptive use of decision strategies," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 8(3), pages 299-329, May.
    16. Bearden, J. Neil & Connolly, Terry, 2007. "Multi-attribute sequential search," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 147-158, May.
    17. Andreas Glöckner & Tilmann Betsch & Nicola Schindler, 2008. "Coherence Shifts in Probabilistic Inference Tasks," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_14, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    18. Andreas Glöckner & Tilmann Betsch, 2008. "Do People Make Decisions Under Risk Based on Ignorance? An Empirical Test of the Priority Heuristic against Cumulative Prospect Theory," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_05, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    19. Carrasco, Juan A. & Baucells, Manel, 2008. "Tight upper bounds for the expected loss of lexicographic heuristics in binary multi-attribute choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 156-189, March.
    20. Wei-Ru Chen, 2008. "Determinants of Firms' Backward- and Forward-Looking R&D Search Behavior," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 609-622, August.
    21. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:229-243 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:261-277 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2008_48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marc Martin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mppggde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.