IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mlb/wpaper/914.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Global Projections of Household Numbers Using Age Determined Ratios

Author

Listed:
  • Victor E. Jennings
  • Conrad W. Lloyd-Smith
  • Duncan S. Ironmonger

Abstract

A new method based upon age determined population ratios is described and used to estimate household population intensities (households per person). Using an additive and a bounded model household projections are given to 2050 for the world and to 2030 for seven fertility transition subgroups (cohorts) of the countries of the world. Based upon United Nations 2002 Revision data, from an estimated 1.56 billion households at 2000, household growth to 2030 is projected to be an additional 1.1 billion households, whether population increase is 1.3 billion persons under the United Nations low fertility variant or 2.7 billion persons under the high fertility variant. At that date over one third of all households are projected to be Chinese or Indian. By 2050 it is projected that there will be 3.3 billion households with a 95 per cent confidence interval on modelling error only of ± 0.5 billion. This compares with 3.2 billion in the Habitat: Global Report on Human Settlements 1996. The apparent similarity of total household growth under various scenarios conceals a wide range in the growth of household intensities across fertility transition cohorts. It is suggested that models, projections and error be reviewed biennially and that household and population projections be produced jointly.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor E. Jennings & Conrad W. Lloyd-Smith & Duncan S. Ironmonger, 2004. "Global Projections of Household Numbers Using Age Determined Ratios," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 914, The University of Melbourne.
    • Handle: RePEc:mlb:wpaper:914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economics.unimelb.edu.au/downloads/wpapers-04/914.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harry Haupt & Walter Oberhofer & Thomas Reichsthaler, 2003. "A Varying-Coefficient Approach To Estimation And Extrapolation Of Household Size," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 249-273.
    2. Frances Kobrin, 1976. "The fall in household size and the rise of the primary individual in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(1), pages 127-138, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudio Ceccarelli & Andrea Cutillo & Davide Di Laurea, 2009. "Metodologie per la stima degli affitti figurativi ed impatto sulla distribuzione del reddito," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(1), pages 17-38, September.
    2. Cristiano Marini & Alessandra Nuccitelli, 2009. "Prime esperienze nel recupero di informazioni sulla mortalità neonatale mediante integrazione di dati amministrativi," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(1), pages 57-84, September.
    3. Carlo Maccheroni & Tiziana Barugola, 2009. "How Many Households? A Comparison of Scenarios in the European Union: from Europop2004 to Europop2008," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(1), pages 39-55, September.
    4. Carolina Corea, 2009. "The deflation of the annual household final consumption expenditure in Italian National Accounts: the chain-linking approach," Rivista di statistica ufficiale, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY), vol. 11(1), pages 5-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jane Menken, 1985. "Age and fertility: How late can you wait?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 22(4), pages 469-483, November.
    2. Frances Goldscheider & Regina Bures, 2003. "The racial crossover in family complexity in the United States," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 40(3), pages 569-587, August.
    3. Overman, Henry G. & Puga, Diego & Turner, Matthew A., 2008. "Decomposing the growth in residential land in the United States," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 487-497, September.
    4. Thomas Burch, 1980. "The index of overall headship: A simple measure of household complexity standardized for age and sex," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 17(1), pages 25-37, February.
    5. Laurence J. Kotlikoff & John N. Morris, 1990. "Why Don't the Elderly Live with Their Children? A New Look," NBER Chapters, in: Issues in the Economics of Aging, pages 149-172, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. M Murphy, 1991. "Household Modelling and Forecasting—Dynamic Approaches with Use of Linked Census Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(6), pages 885-902, June.
    7. Alejandrina Salcedo & Todd Schoellman & Michèle Tertilt, 2012. "Families as roommates: Changes in U.S. household size from 1850 to 2000," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 3(1), pages 133-175, March.
    8. Stanley Smith & June Nogle & Scott Cody, 2002. "A regression approach to estimating the average number of persons per household," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 39(4), pages 697-712, November.
    9. Arland Thornton & Ming-Cheng Chang & Te-Hsiung Sun, 1984. "Social and economic change, intergenerational relationships, and family formation in Taiwan," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 21(4), pages 475-499, November.
    10. Arland Thornton, 2001. "The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 38(4), pages 449-465, November.
    11. Emily Merchant & Brian Gratton & Myron Gutmann, 2012. "A Sudden Transition: Household Changes for Middle Aged U.S. Women in the Twentieth Century," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 31(5), pages 703-726, October.
    12. Susan Short & Frances Goldscheider & Berna Torr, 2006. "Less help for mother: The decline in coresidential female support for the mothers of young children, 1880–2000," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 43(4), pages 617-629, November.
    13. Gary V. Engelhardt & Jonathan Gruber & Cynthia D. Perry, 2002. "Social Security and Elderly Living Arrangements," NBER Working Papers 8911, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. James Sweet, 1984. "components of change in the number of households: 1970–1980," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 21(2), pages 129-140, May.
    15. Stefan Buzar & Ray Hall & Philip E Ogden, 2007. "Beyond Gentrification: The Demographic Reurbanisation of Bologna," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 64-85, January.
    16. Martin Wittenberg & Mark Collinson, 2007. "Restructuring of Households in Rural South Africa: Reflections on Average Household Size in the Agincourt Sub-district 1992-2003," SALDRU Working Papers 12, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    17. David Reher & Miguel Requena, 2018. "Living Alone in Later Life: A Global Perspective," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 427-454, September.
    18. Hafiz A. Pasha & Akhtar Lodhi, 1994. "Determinants of Household Formation in a Third World Setting," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(6), pages 947-957, June.
    19. Axel Borsch-Supan & Jagadeesh Gokhale & Laurence J. Kotlikoff & John N. Morris, 1992. "The Provision of Time to the Elderly by Their Children," NBER Chapters, in: Topics in the Economics of Aging, pages 109-134, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Cheryl Elman & George Myers, 1999. "Geographic morbidity differentials in the late nineteenth-century united states," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 36(4), pages 429-443, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mlb:wpaper:914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dandapani Lokanathan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/demelau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.