IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp9749.html

Evaluating the Long-Run Impact of an Innovative Anti-Poverty Program: Evidence Using Household Panel Data

Author

Listed:
  • Asadullah, Niaz

    (University of Reading)

  • Ara, Jinnat

    (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC))

Abstract

Using a four-round panel data set from the first phase of the Challenging the Frontiers of Poverty Reduction – Targeting the Ultra Poor (CFPR – TUP) programme of BRAC, we investigate whether a one-off transfer of livestock assets improves well-being of the very poor women in Bangladesh. Programme impact is assessed on a wide range of monetary and nonmonetary measures of wellbeing using difference-in-difference (DD) as well as matching methods. We find significant positive long-term impact on food security, household savings, assets and participation in microfinance. Participant women are less likely to be in distress occupation and more into self-employment. However, the long-term effect is much smaller for most outcomes when compared to short- and medium-run impacts. We conclude by discussing the significance of the institutional and regional context for the observed time path of estimated programme effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Asadullah, Niaz & Ara, Jinnat, 2016. "Evaluating the Long-Run Impact of an Innovative Anti-Poverty Program: Evidence Using Household Panel Data," IZA Discussion Papers 9749, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp9749.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gayani Rathnayake & Akanksha Negi & Otavio Bartalotti & Xueyan Zhao, 2024. "Difference-in-Differences with Sample Selection," Papers 2411.09221, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    2. repec:osf:osfxxx:dnc2r_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Geoffrey M. Kistruck & Patrick Shulist, 2021. "Linking Management Theory with Poverty Alleviation Efforts Through Market Orchestration," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(2), pages 423-446, October.
    4. Paul,Boban Varghese & Dutta,Puja Vasudeva & Chaudhary,Sarang, 2021. "Assessing the Impact and Cost of Economic Inclusion Programs : A Synthesis of Evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9536, The World Bank.
    5. Wenguang Yu & Qi Wang & Yaxuan Wang & Guofeng Guan & Yixin Gao, 2023. "Does Targeted Poverty Alleviation Policy Reduce Poverty? Evidence From Rural China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    6. Rishi Kumar, 2022. "Household poverty dynamics in tribal Madhya Pradesh, India: A case study of 54 villages," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 184-203, June.
    7. Niaz Asadullah & Nudrat Faria Shreya & Zaki Wahhaj, 2021. "Access to microfinance and female labour force participation," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2021-30, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Edmonds, Eric & Theoharides, Caroline, 2020. "The short term impact of a productive asset transfer in families with child labor: Experimental evidence from the Philippines," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Leight, Jessica & Hirvonen, Kalle & Zafar, Sarim, 2024. "The effectiveness of cash and cash plus interventions on livelihoods outcomes: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis," OSF Preprints dnc2r, Center for Open Science.
    10. Chowdhury S. B. Jalal & Edward A. Frongillo & Andrea M. Warren & Shibani Kulkarni, 2022. "Subjective Well-Being and Domestic Violence Among Ultra-Poor Women in Rural Bangladesh: Findings from a Multifaceted Poverty Alleviation Program," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 843-853, December.
    11. M. Niaz Asadullah & Antonio Savoia & Kunal Sen, 2020. "Will South Asia Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030? Learning from the MDGs Experience," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 165-189, November.
    12. Shuai Chen & Mingda Cheng & Jie‐Sheng Tan‐Soo, 2024. "How Effective are Decentralized Anti‐poverty Programs?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 32(4), pages 85-113, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • D50 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp9749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Holger Hinte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.