IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp14482.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pay Gaps in the National Health Service: Observability and Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Mumford, Karen A.

    (University of York)

  • Aguirre, Edith

    (ISER, University of Essex)

  • Einarsdóttir, Anna

    (University of York)

  • Lockyer, Bridget

    (University of York)

  • Sayli, Melisa

    (University of Surrey)

  • Smith, Benjamin A.

    (Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust)

Abstract

Studies of the relationship between sexual orientation and pay have faced difficulties applying standard models of discrimination if orientation is not observable. Analogously, behavioural explanations of pay based on models of gender linked within-household specialization may not be as relevant in a nonheterosexual context. This article analyses pay gaps using information including earnings, gender, LGB identity, coupling status, and the disclosure of sexual orientation in English National Health Service (NHS) workplaces. The results reveal a robust gender pay gap of 4% in favour of males, but no overall LGB pay gap compared to heterosexuals. The latter is due to similar-sized offsetting effects from disclosure on LGB pay relative to comparable heterosexuals. Amongst LGB employees, disclosure is associated with 13% more pay, with three quarters of this gap related to unexplained differences in returns to observable characteristics. Supportive workplace practices are strongly associated with increased probability of disclosure, especially the availability of a LGB workplace network.

Suggested Citation

  • Mumford, Karen A. & Aguirre, Edith & Einarsdóttir, Anna & Lockyer, Bridget & Sayli, Melisa & Smith, Benjamin A., 2021. "Pay Gaps in the National Health Service: Observability and Disclosure," IZA Discussion Papers 14482, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp14482.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    disclosure; gender; LGB; NHS; pay;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp14482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Holger Hinte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.