IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iis/dispap/iiisdp450.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Donor that came in from the cold: OECD-Russian engagement on development co-operation

Author

Listed:
  • William Hynes

    (Institute for International Integration Studies, Trinity College Dublin)

  • Alexandra Trzeciak-Duval

    (xxx)

Abstract

Soviet, later Russian, relations with the OECD, notably its Development Assistance Committee (DAC), have oscillated over the decades, along with profound shifts in the world economic balance and in the relative strength of the Russian economy. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union rejected Marshall Aid but later sought to join the OECD. While the OECD could have been a place to pursue East-West economic interests and mutual benefits, political tensions limited the scope for collaboration. Towards the end of the Cold War, the Soviets sought increasing co-operation and this continued into the 1990s when the OECD played a key role in supporting the Former Soviet Union countries, especially the Russian Federation, and aiding their transition to a market economy. The Russian Federation has since become an accession candidate to the OECD, though this process has now been postponed because of political tensions related to Ukraine. This postponement does not preclude stronger collaboration in the area of development co-operation.Development co-operation has been an area of both competitive and collaborative relations between the Russian Federation and OECD members. The Development Assistance Committee of the OECD has its origins in the United States inspired attempts to counter the perceived threat of Soviet communist influence through aid by expanding and improving the collective aid effort of the West. The DAC collected statistics on Soviet bloc development assistance, the accuracy of which was always disputed, and succeeded in promoting only limited in-country co-ordination between the Soviets and Western donors. During the late 1980s, this began to change as the Soviets struggled to maintain their development programmes and sought ever more co-operation. Thereafter DAC members became donors to the Former Soviet Union. Twenty years later, the Russian Federation straddles a unique middle ground between developed and developing countries and has a re-emerging aid programme. This paper reviews Soviet/Russian-DAC co-operation and suggests a twenty-first century Russian-DAC relationship that will enhance development outcomes, at long last keeping a re-emerging donor out of the cold.

Suggested Citation

  • William Hynes & Alexandra Trzeciak-Duval, 2014. "The Donor that came in from the cold: OECD-Russian engagement on development co-operation," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp450, IIIS.
  • Handle: RePEc:iis:dispap:iiisdp450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tcd.ie/triss/assets/PDFs/iiis/iiisdp450.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosalind Eyben & Laura Savage, 2013. "Emerging and Submerging Powers: Imagined Geographies in the New Development Partnership at the Busan Fourth High Level Forum," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 457-469, April.
    2. William Hynes & Peter Carroll, 2013. "Engaging with Arab aid donors: the DAC experience," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp424, IIIS.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alina A. Shenfeldt, 2016. "Anti-Corruption Compliance of Development Assistance Donor Organisations: The Case of Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 28/IR/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Mawdsley & Warwick E. Murray & John Overton & Regina Scheyvens & Glenn Banks, 2018. "Exporting stimulus and “shared prosperity†: Reinventing foreign aid for a retroliberal era," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 25-43, March.
    2. Rory Horner, 2017. "What is global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 202017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Behrooz Morvaridi & Caroline Hughes, 2018. "South–South Cooperation and Neoliberal Hegemony in a Post†aid World," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(3), pages 867-892, May.
    4. Chen, Yunnan & Landry, David, 2018. "Capturing the rains: Comparing Chinese and World Bank hydropower projects in Cameroon and pathways for South-South and North South technology transfer," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 561-571.
    5. Shin, Wonkyu & Kim, Youngwan & Sohn, Hyuk-Sang, 2017. "Do Different Implementing Partnerships Lead to Different Project Outcomes? Evidence from the World Bank Project-Level Evaluation Data," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 268-284.
    6. Nilima Gulrajani, 2022. "Development narratives in a post-aid era: Reflections on implications for the global effectiveness agenda," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-149, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Laura Trajber Waisbich, 2022. "‘It Takes Two to Tango’: South–South Cooperation Measurement Politics in a Multiplex World," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(3), pages 334-345, June.
    8. Stephen Brown, 2020. "The Rise and Fall of the Aid Effectiveness Norm," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(4), pages 1230-1248, September.
    9. Bracho, Gerardo, 2015. "In search of a narrative for Southern providers: the challenge of the emerging economies to the development cooperation agenda," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2015, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    10. Joren Verschaeve & Jan Orbie, 2016. "The DAC is Dead, Long Live the DCF? A Comparative Analysis of the OECD Development Assistance Committee and the UN Development Cooperation Forum," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(4), pages 571-587, September.
    11. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2017. "Converging divergence? Unpacking the new geography of 21st century global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 102017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    12. Sung-Mi Kim, 2017. "International Perceptions of South Korea as Development Partner: Attractions and Strategic Implications," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1086-1101, November.
    13. Bracho, Gerardo, 2017. "The troubled relationship of the emerging powers and the effective development cooperation agenda: history, challenges and opportunities," IDOS Discussion Papers 25/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    OECD; engagement; international organisations; development co-operation; Soviet Union; Russian Federation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy
    • F35 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Aid

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iis:dispap:iiisdp450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maeve (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cetcdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.