IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

More Differentiated Special Treatment in the Agriculture Agreement: beyond concept to practice

Listed author(s):
  • Alan Matthews

This paper examines how more differentiated special treatment of developing countries might be introduced into the WTO agriculture agreement following the Doha Round negotiations. The purpose of special treatment is to facilitate developing countries to meet their food security, rural development and livelihoods concerns. The paper first reviews previous attempts to classify developing countries into foodinsecure and food-secure groups. It argues that such a classification is mainly relevant in the market access pillar of the negotiations, as other criteria for differentiation are implicit in the July 2004 Framework Agreement proposals for the domestic support and export competition pillars. The prospects for an overall agreement are limited unless developed countries feel that they have gained improved access to the markets of the more advanced and competitive agricultural exporters among developing countries. The paper argues that the latter countries might be persuaded to accept shallower SDT if it is the condition for a significant market-opening offer by developed countries. In addition, the developed countries need to build support among low-income developing countries for differentiation by making clear what a more generous SDT offer to food-insecure developing countries not currently classified as LDCs would mean.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by IIIS in its series The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series with number iiisdp108.

in new window

Date of creation: 05 Apr 2006
Handle: RePEc:iis:dispap:iiisdp108
Note: WTO agricultural negotiations, special and differential treatment, differentiation
Contact details of provider: Postal:

Phone: 00 353 1 896 3888
Fax: 00 353 1 896 3939
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Alan Matthews, 2005. "Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp061, IIIS.
  2. Alan Matthews, 2005. "The road from Doha to Hong Kong in the WTO agricultural negotiations: a developing country perspective," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 561-574, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iis:dispap:iiisdp108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Colette Keleher)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.