IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/wpaper/wp24-12.html

Tackling the UK's regional economic inequality: Binding constraints and avenues for policy intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Stansbury

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Dan Turner

    (Centre for Progressive Policy)

  • Ed Balls

    (King's College London and Harvard Kennedy School)

Abstract

This paper analyzes binding constraints to productivity growth in the United Kingdom's regions outside London and the greater South East. These analyses challenge a number of common arguments about the UK's regional economic inequality problem. The authors find little evidence consistent with the hypotheses (i) that low shares of university graduates remain the primary constraint on growth for the UK's regions; (ii) that there is a generalized issue with access to finance for firms outside the South East; or (iii) that low or falling regional migration rates are to blame for the persistence of the UK's regional economic inequalities. Instead, they find evidence consistent with (i) a specific relative shortage of STEM degrees; (ii) binding transport infrastructure constraints within major non-London conurbations; (iii) a failure of public innovation policy to support clusters beyond the South East, in particular through the regional distribution of public support for research and development (R and D); and (iv) missed opportunities for higher internal mobility due to London's overheating housing market. The authors also find some suggestive evidence consistent with constraints on access to early-stage equity financing for high growth-potential small and medium-sized enterprises in certain regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Stansbury & Dan Turner & Ed Balls, 2024. "Tackling the UK's regional economic inequality: Binding constraints and avenues for policy intervention," Working Paper Series WP24-12, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp24-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/2024/tackling-uks-regional-economic-inequality-binding-constraints-and
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Martin Lábaj & Tomáš Oleš & Gabriel Procházka, 2025. "Impact of robots and artificial intelligence on labor and skill demand: evidence from the UK," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 953-1001, December.
    3. Ana Carolina Garriga, 2023. "Box A: Public Confidence in the Bank of England," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 12, pages 16-22.
    4. Niesr, 2023. "National Institute UK Economic Outlook Autumn 2023," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 12, pages 5-40.
    5. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Pabst, Adrian & Caswell, Ben & Robyn Smith & Szendrei, Tibor, 2024. "Outlook for UK Households, the Devolved Nations and the English Regions," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 13, pages 51-87.
    6. Pabst, Adrian, 2024. "Foreward," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 14, pages 3-4.
    7. Bauluz, Luis & Bukowski, Pawel & Fransham, Mark & Lee, Annie Seong & López Forero, Margarita & Novokmet, Filip & Breau, Sébastien & Lee, Neil & Malgouyres, Clément & Schularick, Moritz & Verdugo, Greg, 2023. "Spatial wage inequality in North America and Western Europe: changes between and within local labour markets 1975-2019," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121290, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Paula Bejarano Carbo & Hailey Low & Ben Caswell & Stephen Millard & Dixon, Huw & Mosley, Max, 2024. "UK Economic Outlook: The Macroeconomic Outlook for the United Kingdom," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 13, pages 7-50.
    9. Adam Yousef, 2023. "Box B: Productivity Paradox: Challenges and Opportunities," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 12, pages 66-73.
    10. Nikolaj Broberg & Tuuli Tähtinen & Thomas Walsh, 2025. "Making the Cut: Close Elections and Local Welfare Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 12358, CESifo.
    11. Niesr, 2023. "Forecast tables," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 12, pages 77-85.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp24-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.