IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ies/wpaper/e202415.html

A Pairwise-frontier-based Classification Method for Two-Group Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Qianying Jin

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 211106, China.)

  • Kristiaan Kerstens

    (Univ. Lille, CNRS, IESEG School of Management, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Économie Management, F-59000, Lille, France)

  • Ignace Van de Woestyne

    (KULeuven, Research Centre for Operations Research and Statistics (ORSTAT), Brussels Campus, Warmoesberg 26, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Zhongbao Zhou

    (School of Business Administration, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.)

Abstract

Mathematical programming-based methods are widely used to generate separating boundaries in two-group classification problems. Nonlinear separating boundaries may have better classification performance than linear separating boundaries, but these require a pre-specification of a nonlinear functional form. This contribution proposes a novel pairwise-frontier-based classification (PFC) method to approximate nonlinear separating boundaries, without predetermining a nonlinear functional form. It consists of two steps that explicitly consider and focus on overlap. The first step is to identify the overlap. Importantly, this contribution proposes to construct frontiers based on background knowledge of classification, thus ensuring that their intersection (i.e., overlap) is not increased by blindly applying commonly used axioms. Depending on the axioms applied, pairwise frontiers can be either convex or nonconvex. The second step minimizes identified overlaps by allowing training observations to be misclassified, but all training observations that have been correctly classified must remain correctly classified. The PFC method with hard frontiers is then extended to the one with soft frontiers. The applicability of the proposed PFC methods is illustrated by simulation studies and real-life data sets. The results show that the proposed method is competitive with some well-established classifiers in the literature and even performs better with unbalanced data sets.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianying Jin & Kristiaan Kerstens & Ignace Van de Woestyne & Zhongbao Zhou, 2024. "A Pairwise-frontier-based Classification Method for Two-Group Classification," Working Papers 2024-EQM-05, IESEG School of Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ies:wpaper:e202415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ieseg.fr/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-EQM-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farbmacher, Helmut & Löw, Leander & Spindler, Martin, 2022. "An explainable attention network for fraud detection in claims management," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 244-258.
    2. Pendharkar, Parag C., 2002. "A potential use of data envelopment analysis for the inverse classification problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 243-248, June.
    3. De Bock, Koen W. & Coussement, Kristof & Lessmann, Stefan, 2020. "Cost-sensitive business failure prediction when misclassification costs are uncertain: A heterogeneous ensemble selection approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 612-630.
    4. Laurens Cherchye & Timo Kuosmanen & Thierry Post, 2001. "FDH Directional Distance Functions with an Application to European Commercial Banks," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 201-215, January.
    5. Lessmann, Stefan & Baesens, Bart & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Thomas, Lyn C., 2015. "Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 124-136.
    6. C F Leon & F Palacios, 2009. "Evaluation of rejected cases in an acceptance system with data envelopment analysis and goal programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1411-1420, October.
    7. Mehdi Toloo & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Majid Azadi, 2015. "Obviating some of the theoretical barriers of data envelopment analysis-discriminant analysis: an application in predicting cluster membership of customers," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(4), pages 674-683, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qianying Jin & Kristiaan Kerstens & Ignace Van de Woestyne, 2024. "Convex and nonconvex nonparametric frontier-based classification methods for anomaly detection," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 46(4), pages 1213-1239, December.
    2. Matthias Bogaert & Lex Delaere, 2023. "Ensemble Methods in Customer Churn Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of the State-of-the-Art," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Maarouf, Abdurahman & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Pröllochs, Nicolas, 2025. "A fused large language model for predicting startup success," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(1), pages 198-214.
    4. Liu, Wanan & Fan, Hong & Xia, Meng, 2023. "Tree-based heterogeneous cascade ensemble model for credit scoring," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1593-1614.
    5. De Bock, Koen W. & Coussement, Kristof & Caigny, Arno De & Słowiński, Roman & Baesens, Bart & Boute, Robert N. & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Delen, Dursun & Kraus, Mathias & Lessmann, Stefan & Maldonado, Sebast, 2024. "Explainable AI for Operational Research: A defining framework, methods, applications, and a research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 249-272.
    6. Koen W. de Bock & Kristof Coussement & Arno De Caigny & Roman Slowiński & Bart Baesens & Robert N Boute & Tsan-Ming Choi & Dursun Delen & Mathias Kraus & Stefan Lessmann & Sebastián Maldonado & David , 2023. "Explainable AI for Operational Research: A Defining Framework, Methods, Applications, and a Research Agenda," Post-Print hal-04219546, HAL.
    7. Koen W. De Bock & Matthias Bogaert & Philippe Jardin, 2025. "Ensemble learning for operations research and business analytics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 353(2), pages 419-448, October.
    8. Dangxing Chen & Weicheng Ye & Jiahui Ye, 2022. "Interpretable Selective Learning in Credit Risk," Papers 2209.10127, arXiv.org.
    9. Kristiaan Kerstens & Ignace Van de Woestyne, 2018. "Enumeration algorithms for FDH directional distance functions under different returns to scale assumptions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1067-1078, December.
    10. Ravelojaona, Paola, 2019. "On constant elasticity of substitution – Constant elasticity of transformation Directional Distance Functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 780-791.
    11. Davidescu Adriana AnaMaria & Agafiței Marina-Diana & Strat Vasile Alecsandru & Dima Alina Mihaela, 2024. "Mapping the Landscape: A Bibliometric Analysis of Rating Agencies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 67-85.
    12. Cherchye, L. & Post, G.T., 2001. "Methodological Advances in Dea," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-53-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. He, Ni & Yongqiao, Wang & Tao, Jiang & Zhaoyu, Chen, 2022. "Self-Adaptive bagging approach to credit rating," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    14. Yang, Bing & Van Aelst, Stefan & Verdonck, Tim, 2026. "Diverse ensemble cost-sensitive logistic regression," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 282-294.
    15. Li, Yibei & Wang, Ximei & Djehiche, Boualem & Hu, Xiaoming, 2020. "Credit scoring by incorporating dynamic networked information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1103-1112.
    16. Huiyu Cui & Lifang Zhang & Hufang Yang & Jianzhou Wang & Zhenkun Liu, 2025. "Maximizing the lender’s profit: profit-oriented loan default prediction based on a weighting model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 353(2), pages 727-760, October.
    17. Lismont, Jasmien & Vanthienen, Jan & Baesens, Bart & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2017. "Defining analytics maturity indicators: A survey approach," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 114-124.
    18. Doumpos, Michalis & Zopounidis, Constantin & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Platanakis, Emmanouil & Zhang, Wenke, 2023. "Operational research and artificial intelligence methods in banking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 1-16.
    19. Gunnarsson, Björn Rafn & vanden Broucke, Seppe & Baesens, Bart & Óskarsdóttir, María & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2021. "Deep learning for credit scoring: Do or don’t?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 292-305.
    20. Neha Chhabra Roy, 2024. "Sustainable lending strategies: a framework for enhancing climate resilience in industrial loan portfolios," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 423-462, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ies:wpaper:e202415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lies BOUTEN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iesegfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.